| Date |
Text |
| 2013-11-21 11:55:52 | BUILDING PLAN REVIEW |
| | PERMIT: 13110085 |
| | ADD: 532 E LAKEWOOD RD |
| | CONT: TURSO CONTRACTING INC. |
| | TEL: (561)439-7326 |
| | |
| | 2010 FLORIDA BUILDING CODE W |
| | * 2010 WEST PALM BEACH AMENDMENTS TO THE FLORIDA |
| | BUILDING CODE, CHAPTER 1, ADMINISTRATION, 2010 EDITION |
| | 2012 FBC SUPPLEMENTS ADOPTED APRIL 25/2013. |
| | |
| | 2010 EXISTING BUILDING CODE LEVEL II 701.3 |
| | COMPLIANCE. ALL NEW CONSTRUCTION ELEMENTS, COMPONENTS, |
| | SYSTEMS, AND SPACES SHALL COMPLY WITH THE REQUIREMENTS |
| | OF THE FLORIDA BUILDING CODE, BUILDING. |
| | |
| | 1ST REVIEW |
| | DATE: THURS. NOV. 21/ 2013 |
| | ACTION: DENIED |
| | |
| | 1) THE PLANS ARE NOT CLEAR AS TO WHAT IS BEING CHANGED, |
| | ON THE FIRST FLOOR, MEZZANINE OR 2 ND FLOOR. 2010 |
| | FLORIDA BUILDING CODE W * 2010 WEST PALM BEACH |
| | AMENDMENTS TO THE FLORIDA BUILDING CODE, CHAPTER 1, |
| | ADMINISTRATION, 2010 EDITION 107.2.1 INFORMATION ON |
| | CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS. CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS SHALL BE |
| | DIMENSIONED AND DRAWN UPON SUITABLE MATERIAL. |
| | ELECTRONIC MEDIA DOCUMENTS SHALL BE SUBMITTED WHEN |
| | APPROVED BY THE BUILDING OFFICIAL. CONSTRUCTION |
| | DOCUMENTS SHALL BE OF SUFFICIENT CLARITY TO INDICATE |
| | THE LOCATION, NATURE AND EXTENT OF THE WORK PROPOSED |
| | AND SHOW IN DETAIL THAT IT WILL CONFORM TO THE |
| | PROVISIONS OF THIS CODE AND RELEVANT LAWS, ORDINANCES, |
| | RULES AND REGULATIONS, AS DETERMINED BY THE BUILDING |
| | OFFICIAL. SUCH DRAWINGS AND SPECIFICATIONS SHALL |
| | CONTAIN INFORMATION, IN THE FORM OF NOTES OR OTHERWISE, |
| | AS TO THE QUALITY OF MATERIALS, WHERE QUALITY IS |
| | ESSENTIAL TO CONFORMITY WITH THE TECHNICAL CODES. |
| | |
| | 2) THE EXISTING FLOOR PLAN DOES NOT INDICATE A RESTROOM |
| | IN THE AREA OF WHERE WORK IS TO BE COMPLETED, IT SHOWS |
| | WHAT APPEARS TO BE A PAIR OF WINDOWS AND THE PROPOSED |
| | PLAN SHOWS A NEW RESTROOM IN FRONT OF WHAT APPEARS TO |
| | BE A OVERHEAD OPENING. THE PLANS DO NOT INDICATE CODE |
| | COMPLIANCE FOR ACCESSIBLITY, MEANS OF EGRESS, |
| | CONCEPTUAL IN NATURE. |
| | |
| | 107.3.5 MINIMUM PLAN REVIEW CRITERIA FOR BUILDINGS. THE |
| | EXAMINATION OF THE DOCUMENTS BY THE BUILDING OFFICIAL |
| | SHALL INCLUDE THE FOLLOWING MINIMUM CRITERIA AND |
| | DOCUMENTS: A FLOOR PLAN; SITE PLAN; FOUNDATION PLAN; |
| | FLOOR/ROOF FRAMING PLAN OR TRUSS LAYOUT; ALL |
| | FENESTRATION PENETRATIONS; FLASHING; AND ROUGH OPENING |
| | DIMENSIONS; AND ALL EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS: |
| | 107.3.5.1 COMMERCIAL BUILDINGS: |
| | OCCUPANCY GROUP AND SPECIAL OCCUPANCY REQUIREMENTS |
| | SHALL BE DETERMINED. |
| | MINIMUM TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION SHALL BE DETERMINED (SEE |
| | TABLE 503). |
| | FIRE-RESISTANT CONSTRUCTION REQUIREMENTS SHALL INCLUDE |
| | THE FOLLOWING COMPONENTS: |
| | FIRE-RESISTANT SEPARATIONS |
| | FIRE-RESISTANT PROTECTION FOR TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION |
| | PROTECTION OF OPENINGS AND PENETRATIONS OF RATED WALLS |
| | FIRE BLOCKING AND DRAFTSTOPPING AND CALCULATED FIRE |
| | RESISTANCE |
| | OCCUPANCY LOAD/EGRESS REQUIREMENTS SHALL INCLUDE: |
| | OCCUPANCY LOAD |
| | GROSS |
| | NET |
| | MEANS OF EGRESS |
| | EXIT ACCESS |
| | EXIT |
| | EXIT DISCHARGE |
| | STAIRS CONSTRUCTION/GEOMETRY AND PROTECTION |
| | DOORS |
| | EMERGENCY LIGHTING AND EXIT SIGNS |
| | |
| | 3) 2010 FL EXISTING BUILDING CODE 101.5 COMPLIANCE |
| | METHODS. |
| | THE REPAIR, ALTERATION, CHANGE OF OCCUPANCY, ADDITION |
| | OR RELOCATION OF ALL EXISTING BUILDINGS SHALL COMPLY |
| | WITH ONE OF THE METHODS LISTED IN SECTIONS 101.5.1 |
| | THROUGH 101.5.3 AS SELECTED BY THE APPLICANT. |
| | APPLICATION OF A METHOD SHALL BE THE SOLE BASIS FOR |
| | ASSESSING THE COMPLIANCE OF WORK PERFORMED UNDER A |
| | SINGLE PERMIT UNLESS OTHERWISE APPROVED BY THE CODE |
| | OFFICIAL. SECTIONS 101.5.1 THROUGH 101.5.3 SHALL NOT BE |
| | APPLIED IN COMBINATION WITH EACH OTHER. |
| | |
| | 4) 2010 FL ACCESSIBILITY CODE 202.4.1 DISPROPORTIONATE |
| | COST. |
| | ALTERATIONS MADE TO PROVIDE AN ACCESSIBLE PATH OF |
| | TRAVEL TO THE ALTERED AREA WILL BE DEEMED |
| | DISPROPORTIONATE TO THE OVERALL ALTERATION WHEN THE |
| | COST EXCEEDS 20% OF THE COST OF THE ALTERATION TO THE |
| | PRIMARY FUNCTION AREA. COSTS THAT MAY BE COUNTED AS |
| | EXPENDITURES REQUIRED TO PROVIDE AN ACCESSIBLE PATH OF |
| | TRAVEL MAY INCLUDE: (I) COSTS ASSOCIATED WITH PROVIDING |
| | AN ACCESSIBLE ENTRANCE AND AN ACCESSIBLE ROUTE TO THE |
| | ALTERED AREA; (II) COSTS ASSOCIATED WITH MAKING |
| | RESTROOMS ACCESSIBLE, SUCH AS INSTALLING GRAB BARS, |
| | ENLARGING TOILET STALLS, INSULATING PIPES, OR |
| | INSTALLING ACCESSIBLE FAUCET CONTROLS; (III) COSTS |
| | ASSOCIATED WITH PROVIDING ACCESSIBLE TELEPHONES, SUCH |
| | AS RELOCATING THE TELEPHONE TO AN ACCESSIBLE HEIGHT, |
| | INSTALLING AMPLIFICATION DEVICES, OR INSTALLING A TEXT |
| | TELEPHONE (TTY); (IV) COSTS ASSOCIATED WITH RELOCATING |
| | AN INACCESSIBLE DRINKING FOUNTAIN. |
| | |
| | 202.4.2 ACCESSIBLE FEATURES IN THE EVENT OF |
| | DISPROPORTIONALITY. |
| | WHEN THE COST OF ALTERATIONS NECESSARY TO MAKE THE PATH |
| | OF TRAVEL TO THE ALTERED AREA FULLY ACCESSIBLE IS |
| | DISPROPORTIONATE TO THE COST OF THE OVERALL ALTERATION, |
| | THE PATH OF TRAVEL SHALL BE MADE ACCESSIBLE TO THE |
| | EXTENT THAT IT CAN BE MADE ACCESSIBLE WITHOUT INCURRING |
| | DISPROPORTIONATE COSTS. IN CHOOSING WHICH ACCESSIBLE |
| | ELEMENTS TO PROVIDE, PRIORITY SHOULD BE GIVEN TO THOSE |
| | ELEMENTS THAT WILL PROVIDE THE GREATEST ACCESS, IN THE |
| | FOLLOWING ORDER: (I) AN ACCESSIBLE ENTRANCE; (II) AN |
| | ACCESSIBLE ROUTE TO THE ALTERED AREA; (III) AT LEAST |
| | ONE ACCESSIBLE RESTROOM FOR EACH SEX OR A SINGLE UNISEX |
| | RESTROOM; (IV) ACCESSIBLE TELEPHONES; (V) ACCESSIBLE |
| | DRINKING FOUNTAINS; AND (VI) WHEN POSSIBLE, ADDITIONAL |
| | ACCESSIBLE ELEMENTS SUCH AS PARKING, STORAGE, AND |
| | ALARMS. |
| | |
| | JAMES A. WITMER CBO |
| | SENIOR COMMERCIAL COMBINATION PLANS EXAMINER |
| | TEL: 561-805-6715 |
| | FAX: 561-805-6676 |
| | E-MAIL: [email protected] |
| | DEVELOPMENT SERVICES HOME PAGE |
| | HTTP://WWW.CITYOFWPB.COM/CONSTRUCTION/INDEX.PHP |
| | |
| | PLEASE NOTE: FLORIDA HAS A VERY BROAD PUBLIC RECORDS |
| | LAW. WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS TO OR FROM LOCAL OFFICIALS |
| | REGARDING CITY BUSINESS ARE PUBLIC RECORD, AVAILABLE TO |
| | THE PUBLIC UPON REQUEST. YOUR E-MAIL COMMUNICATIONS ARE |
| | THEREFORE SUBJECT TO PUBLIC DISCLOSURE. |
| | |
| | MEMBER OF BOAF: BUILDING OFFICIALS ASSOCIATION OF |
| | FLORIDA SAVING LIVES AND PROPERTY SINCE 1953 |
| | |