| Plan Review Notes For Permit 13090864 |
| Permit Number |
13090864 |
|
| Review Stop |
B |
| Sequence Number |
1 |
|
| Notes |
| Date |
Text |
| 2013-09-28 08:01:27 | 2010 FBC | | | | | | DENIED BY BUILDING | | | | | | 1) THE GENETIC ENGINEERING IS NOT ACCEPTABLE. THE | | | ENGINEERING IS REQUIRED TO BE SPECIFIC TO THE PROPOSED | | | INSTALLATION. FBC R301.1.3 | | | | | | 2) SPECIFY THE LOCATION, WIND SPEED, EXPOSURE CATEGORY, | | | ROOF SLOPE AND THE MEAN ROOF HEIGHT ON THE ENGINEERING. | | | FBC R301.2.1 | | | | | | 3) THE SIGNATURES ON ENGINEERED DOCUMENTS ARE REQUIRED | | | TO BE ORIGINAL HANDWRITTEN SIGNATURES. FS 471 AND FAC | | | 61G15-23.002 | | | | | | 4) THE SIGNED AND SEALED DOCUMENTS (PV.1.0) THAT WERE | | | SUBMITTED HAVE DIFFERENT PHOTOS AND WORDING. ONE IS | | | DATED JUNE 22, 2013 AND THE OTHER JULY 08, 2013. PLEASE | | | SUBMIT TWO OF THE SAME SIGNED AND SEALED DOCUMENTS. | | | CITY AMENDMENTS 107.2.1 | | | | | | 5) THE ENGINEER IS SPECIFYING 6 FASTENERS AND THE | | | PRODUCT APPROVAL REQUIRES A MINIMUM OF 10 AT 8" O.C. | | | PROVIDE SIGNED AND SEALED CALCULATIONS TO JUSTIFY THE | | | REDUCTION IN FASTENERS. CITY AMENDMENTS 107.2.1.3 | | | | | | 6) THE PROPOSED WORK IS NOT INCIDENTAL TO A ROOFING | | | PERMIT AND THE BUILDING OFFICIAL HAS DETERMINED THAT | | | THIS SCOPE OF WORK DOES NOT FALL WITHIN THE PARAMETERS | | | OF WORK THAT A ROOFING CONTRACTOR IS ALLOWED TO | | | PERFORM. FS 489 | | | | | | ROBERT MCDOUGAL | | | BLDG. PLAN REVIEW | | | (561)805-6714 | | | [email protected] |
|
