| Date |
Text |
| 2013-12-02 11:53:22 | 2010 FBC |
| | |
| | DENIED BY BUILDING |
| | |
| | 1) SUBMIT TWO COPIES OF A SURVEY AND A SITE PLAN |
| | SHOWING THE LOCATION OF THE PROPOSED ADDITION. (WAS NOT |
| | ADDRESSED.) |
| | |
| | 2) ADDITIONAL INFORMATION IS REQUIRED TO SUPPORT THE |
| | ENGINEER'S LETTER AND DRAWING OF THE EXISTING |
| | FOUNDATION, STEM WALL AND SLAB THAT WAS INSTALLED |
| | WITHOUT A PERMIT OR INSPECTIONS. PLEASE SPECIFY THE |
| | METHODS THAT WERE USED TO DETERMINE THE FOOTER |
| | THICKNESS AND WIDTH, THE REINFORCING STEEL IN THE STEM |
| | WALL AND THE 6 X 6 W.W.F. IN THE 4" SLAB. HOW WAS THE |
| | COMPACTION OF THE SOIL UNDER THE SLAB VERIFIED? WERE |
| | ANY PHOTOGRAPHS TAKEN DURING THE CONSTRUCTION? IS THIS |
| | DESIGN BASED ON A PREVIOUS SET OF DRAWINGS FOR THIS |
| | PROJECT? WAS AN EXCAVATION ADJACENT TO THE FOOTER USED? |
| | IS THERE ANY RECORD OF A SOIL COMPACTION TEST FOR THE |
| | FOOTINGS OR SLAB? CITY AMENDMENTS 107.2.1.3 |
| | |
| | 3) FBC R314.3.1 REQUIRES SMOKE ALARMS TO BE INSTALLED |
| | AS REQUIRED FOR NEW DWELLINGS WHEN ADDITIONS OR |
| | ALTERATIONS REQUIRING PERMITS OCCUR. SHOW COMPLIANCE. |
| | THE REVISED PLANS SHOW A SMOKE ALARM IN THE FAMILY |
| | ROOM, WHICH IS NOT REQUIRED. BECAUSE THE FLOOR PLAN |
| | DOES NOT INCLUDE THE ENTIRE DWELLING, A NOTE ON THE |
| | PLANS STATING THAT SMOKE ALARMS WILL BE INSTALLED IN |
| | EACH SLEEPING ROOM AND OUTSIDE EACH SEPARATE SLEEPING |
| | AREA IN THE IMMEDIATE VICINITY OF THE BEDROOMS AS |
| | REQUIRED BY FBC R314 WILL BE SUFFICIENT TO ADDRESS THIS |
| | REQUIREMENT. |
| | |
| | 4) COMMENT HAS BEEN ADDRESSED. |
| | |
| | 5) FORM 402-2010 SPECIFIES CERTAIN PERFORMANCE CRITERIA |
| | THAT MUST BE MET. THE EXTERIOR WALL INSULATION FOR |
| | FRAME IS REQUIRED TO BE R-13 AND R-11 IS SPECIFIED ON |
| | THE FORM. R-11 IS INCORRECTLY SPECIFIED ON THE FORM FOR |
| | CONCRETE OR MASONRY " MASS" WALLS, THIS ADDITION DOES |
| | NOT HAVE EXTERIOR CONCRETE OR MASONRY WALLS. THERE ARE |
| | NO WALLS THAT ARE "ADJACENT" TO UNCONDITIONED SPACE. |
| | SEE FBC ENERGY CONSERVATION 402.1. PLEASE SUBMIT |
| | CORRECTED ENERGY FORMS. |
| | |
| | 6) COMMENT HAS BEEN ADDRESSED. |
| | |
| | 7) COMMENT HAS BEEN ADDRESSED. |
| | |
| | 8) THE PRODUCT APPROVAL FOR THE TAMKO MODIFIED ROOFING |
| | SYSTEM NOA NO. 12-0716.18 HAS BEEN REPLACED BY NOA NO. |
| | 12-1003.05. PLEASE SUBMIT THE CURRENT PRODUCT APPROVAL |
| | THAT HAS BEEN REVIEWED AND APPROVED IN WRITING BY THE |
| | DESIGNER OF RECORD. DCA RULE 9N-3 AND CITY AMENDMENTS |
| | 107.3.4.1 (WAS NOT ADDRESSED.) |
| | |
| | 9) SPECIFY THE APPROVED ASSEMBLY, THE FASTENING OPTION |
| | AND THE MINIMUM DESIGN PRESSURES THAT WILL BE USED TO |
| | INSTALL THE TAMKO ROOFING SYSTEM. PROVIDE TWO SETS OF |
| | SIGNED AND SEALED RAS 117 CALCULATIONS FOR ENHANCED |
| | FASTENING FOR THE PERIMETER AND CORNER ROOF AREAS, AS |
| | REQUIRED BY LIMITATION #7 ON THE LAST PAGE OF THE NOA. |
| | FBC R905.1 (WAS NOT ADDRESSED.) |
| | |
| | 10) THE VALUE FOR THE WORK SPECIFIED ON THE APPLICATION |
| | OF $1500.00 IS TOO LOW. FOR PERMITTING FEE PURPOSES THE |
| | VALUE IS TO BE THE TOTAL REPLACEMENT VALUE INCLUDING |
| | STRUCTURAL, ELECTRICAL, DESIGN FEES, OVERHEAD AND |
| | PROFIT AS WOULD BE CHARGED BY A CONTRACTOR. PLEASE |
| | PROVIDE AN ACCURATE CONSTRUCTION COST VALUE. CITY |
| | AMENDMENTS 109.3 (WAS NOT ADDRESSED.) |
| | |
| | 11) IN ORDER TO SPEED PLAN REVIEW TIME, PLEASE SUBMIT A |
| | RESPONSE LETTER INDICATING HOW EACH OF THE REVIEW |
| | COMMENTS WAS ADDRESSED. |
| | |
| | ROBERT MCDOUGAL |
| | BLDG. PLAN REVIEW |
| | (561)805-6714 |
| | [email protected] |
| | |
| | |
