| Date |
Text |
| 2013-09-05 13:41:33 | REVISION DENIED |
| | |
| | 1) THE LETTER FROM PEDRO DIEZ, D.O.R. FOR THE PROJECT |
| | REFERENCES A WF-36 FOOTING AT THE PHOTO BOOTH. THE |
| | APPROVED PLANS ON FILE WITH THE CITY DO NOT SPECIFY A |
| | PHOTO BOTH AND THE FOOTING SCHEDULE DOES NOT LIST A |
| | WF-36 FOOTING. CITY AMENDMENTS 107.2.1 |
| | |
| | 2) THE PRODUCT APPROVALS REQUIRED BY DCA RULE 9N-3 THAT |
| | WERE SUBMITTED ARE REQUIRED TO BE REVIEWED AND APPROVED |
| | IN WRITING BY THE DESIGNER OF RECORED. CITY AMENDMENTS |
| | 107.3.4.1 |
| | |
| | 3) THE ENGINEERING THAT WAS SUBMITTED FOR THE EXTERIOR |
| | STOREFRONT DOORS FROM THE DELEGATED (SPECIALTY) |
| | ENGINEER IS REQUIRED TO BE REVIEWED AND APPROVED IN |
| | WRITING BY THE DESIGNER OF RECORD FOR THE PROJECT PRIOR |
| | TO BEING SUBMITTED TO THE BUILDING DEPARTMENT. FAC |
| | 61G15-30.005 |
| | |
| | 4) THE ENGINEER'S ORIGINAL SIGNATURE AND SEAL IS |
| | REQUIRED ON THE ENGINEERING THAT WAS SUBMITTED FOR THE |
| | EXTERIOR STOREFRONT DOORS FACSIMILES ARE NOT |
| | ACCEPTABLE. CITY AMENDMENTS 107.2.1.3 AND FAC |
| | 61G15-23.002 |
| | |
| | 5) SUBMIT TWO COMPLETE COPIES OF THE PRODUCT APPROVALS |
| | (INCLUDING INSTALLATION INSTRUCTIONS) THAT ARE |
| | SPECIFIED ON SHEET 1 OF 9 OF THE STOREFRONT |
| | ENGINEERING. DCA RULE 9N-3 |
| | |
| | 6) THE ENGINEERING THAT WAS SUBMITTED FOR THE EXTERIOR |
| | STOREFRONT DOORS IS DIFFICULT TO READ DUE TO THE SIZE |
| | AFTER BEING REDUCED TO FIT ON 8.5" X 11" PAPER. IN |
| | ORDER TO PROVIDE CLARITY FOR RECORDS MANAGEMENT SUBMIT |
| | LARGER SIZE FONT AND DRAWINGS. CITY AMENDMENTS |
| | 107.2.1.4 |
| | |
| | ROBERT MCDOUGAL |
| | BLDG. PLAN REVIEW |
| | (561)805-6714 |
| | [email protected] |
