| Date |
Text |
| 2013-09-24 12:21:58 | 2010 FBC |
| | |
| | DENIED BY BUILDING |
| | 1) THE DESCRIPTION OF WORK ON THE PERMIT APPLICATION |
| | STATES REMODEL TWO COTTAGES BEHIND MAIN HOUSE ACCORDING |
| | TO PLANS. SPECIFY THE COMPLETE SCOPE OF WORK ON THE |
| | PLANS. IF WORK HAS BEEN DONE WITHOUT PERMITS INCLUDE |
| | THAT WORK IN THE DESCRIPTION OF WORK ON THE PLANS. CITY |
| | AMENDMENTS 107.2.1 |
| | |
| | 2) THE PROPERTY APPRAISER'S WEBSITE INDICATES THAT THE |
| | SMALL STRUCTURE IS A FINISHED DETACHED UTILITY |
| | BUILDING. PLEASE CLARIFY. CITY AMENDMENTS 107.2.1 |
| | |
| | 3) THE AERIAL PHOTOS APPEAR TO SHOW THE BUILDINGS MUCH |
| | CLOSER TO EACH OTHER THAN THE SITE PLAN THAT WAS |
| | SUBMITTED. SUBMIT TWO COPIES OF A RECENT SURVEY THAT |
| | SHOWS THE DISTANCE BETWEEN STRUCTURES. NOTE: IF THERE |
| | IS A CHANGE OF OCCUPANCY, THE BUILDINGS WILL BE |
| | REQUIRED TO COMPLY WITH FIRE SEPARATION DISTANCES OF |
| | THE 2010 FBCR, AS WELL AS, WINDLOAD, EGRESS, LIGHT & |
| | VENTILATION AND ENERGY CONSERVATION REQUIREMENTS. FBC |
| | EXISTING BUILDING CHAPTER 9. |
| | |
| | 4) IT APPEARS FROM A PREVIOUS PERMIT APPLICATION THAT |
| | THE SMALLER BUILDING WAS APPROVED AS AN ACCESSORY |
| | STRUCTURE WITH THE KITCHEN TO BE REMOVED AND NOT TO BE |
| | RENTED. THE LARGER STRUCTURE WAS APPROVED FOR STORAGE |
| | ONLY. |
| | |
| | 5) PLEASE SUBMIT A RESPONSE LETTER INDICATING HOW THE |
| | REVIEW COMMENTS WERE ADDRESSED. CITY AMENDMENTS |
| | 107.2.1.3 NOTE: ADDITIONAL COMMENTS MAY RESULT WHEN |
| | MORE INFORMATION IS PROVIDED. SEE ZONING COMMENTS. |
| | |
| | ROBERT MCDOUGAL |
| | BLDG. PLAN REVIEW |
| | (561)805-6714 |
| | [email protected] |
