| Date |
Text |
| 2015-01-08 15:05:25 | RESIDENTIAL (R3) ADDITION THIRD BUILDING REVIEW |
| | CHECKLIST. |
| | CODE: 2010 FBC. |
| | |
| | 1- UPDATED GEOTECHNICAL EXPLORATION REPORT SUBMITTED |
| | RECOMMENDS A MINIMUM WIDTH OF 24" INCHES FOR CONTINUOUS |
| | FOOTING. FOOTING SIZES SHOWN ON SHEET S-1 ARE SMALLER |
| | THAN THE RECOMMENDED BY THE GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEER. |
| | ENGINEER OF RECORD TO EITHER REVISE PLANS PER |
| | RECOMMENDATIONS OR ACKNOWLEDGE IN WRITING THAT HE |
| | REVIEWED THE GEOTECHNICAL EXPLORATION REPORT AND |
| | DESIGNED FOOTING SIZES WILL STILL MEET THE REQUIRED |
| | LOADS. SEC. 107.2.1.3 OF CITY AMENDMENTS TO FBC. |
| | |
| | 2- PROVIDE PRODUCT APPROVAL (2 COPIES) AS REQUIRED BY |
| | DC RULE 9N-3 FOR: |
| | A) CASEMENT WINDOWS SIZE AND TYPE AS SHOWN ON WINDOW |
| | SCHEDULE FOR THE STUDY AND BEDROOM #1. NOTE: NOA |
| | 12-1220.14 SUBMITTED DOESN'T COVER SIZES (50" X 50" AND |
| | 62" X 50") SHOWN ON THE SCHEDULE AND THEY DON'T LOOK |
| | LIKE LIKE SINGLE HUNG WINDOWS. (REPEAT COMMENT). |
| | |
| | B) OVERHEAD GARAGE DOOR THAT MEETS THE DESIGN PRESSURES |
| | CALCULATED BY THE ENGINEER OF RECORD. NOA 11-0211.03 |
| | SUBMITTED DOESN'T MEET THE CALCULATED DESIGN PRESSURES. |
| | |
| | C) ROOF TILE ADHESIVE NOA 12-0228.18 WAS SUPERSEDED BY |
| | MIAMI-DADE. NEED CURRENT NOA. (REPEAT COMMENT. SAME NOA |
| | WAS RE-SUBMITTED AGAIN). |
| | |
| | 3- ENGINEER OF RECORD TO REVIEW AND APPROVED ABOVE |
| | PRODUCT APPROVALS. SEC. 107.3.4.1 CITY AMENDMENTS TO |
| | FBC. |
| | |
| | 4- SHEET S-7: COORDINATE WINDOWS/DOORS DESIGN PRESSURES |
| | WITH DESIGN PRESSURES SHOWN ON WINDOW/DOOR SCHEDULE ON |
| | SHEET A400. SEC. R301.2.1.4.3 OF 2010 FBC-RESIDENTIAL. |
| | (REPEAT COMMENT). |
| | |
| | 5- REVISE ENERGY CALCULATIONS FOR THE MAIN HOUSE. SEC. |
| | 103.2.2 OF 2010 FBC-ENERGY CONSERVATION: |
| | A) PROVIDE COMPLETE INFORMATION ON TOP OF FORM, |
| | INCLUDING THE PERMIT OFFICE AND JURISDICTION NUMBER. |
| | B) CALCULATIONS ARE DONE FOR THE ENTIRE HOUSE (1793 S. |
| | F.) NOT JUST THE ADDITION. REVISE ITEM #1. |
| | C) REVISE NUMBER OF BEDROOMS ON ITEM #4. |
| | D) REVISE THE AREA WEIGHTED AVERAGE OVERHANG DEPTH ON |
| | ITEM #7 TO MATCH PLANS. |
| | E) CLARIFY WHERE IS THE ROOF DECK AREA SPECIFIED ON |
| | ITEM #10(B). |
| | F) REVISE THE "SPACES" INFORMATION ON PAGE 2 OF 5. |
| | THERE IS A KITCHEN IN THIS HOUSE. |
| | G) REVISE THE "FLOORS" INFORMATION ON PAGE 2 OF 5. THE |
| | PERIMETER AREA IS INCORRECT. |
| | H) REVISE THE "WINDOWS" INFORMATION ON PAGE 3 OF 5. |
| | REVISE THE OVERHANG DEPTH AND OVERHANG SEPARATION TO |
| | MATCH PLANS. |
| | |
| | 6- REVISE ENERGY CALCULATIONS FOR THE 2 STORY CABANA. |
| | SEC. 103.2.2 OF 2010 FBC-ENERGY CONSERVATION: |
| | A) PROVIDE COMPLETE INFORMATION ON TOP OF FORM, |
| | INCLUDING THE PERMIT OFFICE AND JURISDICTION NUMBER. |
| | B) REVISE NUMBER OF BEDROOMS ON ITEM #4 TO MATCH PLANS. |
| | C) CLARIFY WHAT KIND OF INSULATION WILL PROVIDE R11 |
| | INSULATION ON CONCRETE BLOCK WALLS AS SPECIFIED ON ITEM |
| | #9(A). |
| | D) CLARIFY WHERE IS THE ROOF DECK AREA SPECIFIED ON |
| | ITEM #10(B). |
| | E) REVISE THE "SPACES" INFORMATION ON PAGE 2 OF 5. |
| | THERE IS NOT KITCHEN IN THE CABANA. AND, WHY THERE ARE |
| | "ZERO" OCCUPANTS ON FIRST FLOOR? |
| | F) REVISE THE "DOORS" INFORMATION ON PAGE 3 OF 5. THERE |
| | ARE NO WOOD DOORS. SEE PLANS AND PRODUCT APPROVALS. |
| | |
| | 7- SHEET A100: CABANA SECOND FLOOR SAYS "BEDROOM #2". |
| | WHERE IS THE FIRST BEDROOM. IS THE UNIT ON THE FIRST |
| | FLOOR BEDROOM #1? CLARIFY AND REVISE AS REQUIRED. AND, |
| | COORDINATE WITH THE ENERGY CALCULATIONS. SEC. 107.2.1 |
| | CITY AMENDMENTS. |
| | |
| | 8- PROVIDE COMPLETE DETAILS AND SPECIFICATIONS SHOWING |
| | R11 INSULATION ON CONCRETE BLOCK WALLS AND R45 ON |
| | CEILINGS AS SPECIFIED ON CABANA ENERGY CALCULATIONS ON |
| | ITEM #9(A). |
| | SEC. 103.2.2 OF 2010 FBC-ENERGY CONSERVATION. |
| | |
| | 9- SHEET S-3 AND SHEET S-5: PROVIDE COMPLETE FRAMING |
| | DETAILS AND SPECIFICATIONS. SPECIFY ALL FRAMING |
| | MEMBERS. SPECIFY ALL FASTENERS AT ALL CONNECTIONS. WALL |
| | SECTION ON SHEET S-5 DOESN'T PROVIDE COMPLETE |
| | SPECIFICATIONS FOR ALL CONNECTIONS. SEC. R301.1 OF 2010 |
| | FBC-RESIDENTIAL. |
| | ***NOTE: TAKE INTO CONSIDERATION THE GABLE END BRACING |
| | ON BOTH SIDES. |
| | |
| | 10- PROVIDE DETAIL AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR GARAGE DOOR |
| | STRUCTURAL BUCK DETAIL. SEC. R301.1 OF 2010 |
| | FBC-RESIDENTIAL. |
| | |
| | *** PLEASE PROVIDE RESPONSE LETTER ADDRESSING EACH |
| | COMMENT TO EXPEDITE THE REVIEW PROCESS. |
| | *** PLEASE REMOVE AND REPLACE ANY REVISED SHEET. |
| | |
| | IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS, PLEASE CONTACT |
| | JULIO GOMEZ |
| | COMMERCIAL COMBINATION, PLANS EXAMINER |
| | DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT |
| | (561)805-6712 |
| | [email protected] |
