| Date |
Text |
| 2014-04-14 16:00:55 | RESIDENTIAL (R3) ADDITION, SECOND BUILDING REVIEW |
| | CHECKLIST. |
| | CODE: 2010 FBC. |
| | |
| | 1- PLANS NEED ENGINEER'S ORIGINAL SEAL AND SIGNATURE. |
| | CHAPTER 61G15-23.002. DIGITAL SIGNATURE IS ONLY FOR |
| | ELECTRONICALLY TRANSMITTED PLANS. |
| | |
| | 2- SHEET S-1: |
| | A) CLARIFY/REVISE FOOTING F3 SPECIFIED FOR THE NEW |
| | TRELLIS. SEC. R301 OF 2010 FBC-RESIDENTIAL. |
| | |
| | B) REVISE STRUCTURAL NOTE #10: (1)BUILDING EXPOSURE IS |
| | "C" NOT "B". SEC. R301.2.1.4.3. |
| | |
| | 3- A) UPDATE SOIL TEST REPORT TO INCLUDE THE PROPOSED |
| | TWO STORY CONCRETE BLOCK ADDITION. TEST REPORT |
| | SUBMITTED IS FOR THE SINGLE STORY ADDITION ONLY. NEED |
| | ADDITIONAL TEST BORINGS ON THE TWO STORY ADDITION |
| | LOCATION. SEC. R401.4. |
| | |
| | B) PROVIDE 2 COPIES. ONLY ONE WAS SUBMITTED AT THIS |
| | TIME. |
| | |
| | 4- PROVIDE PRODUCT APPROVAL (2 COPIES) FOR SINGLE |
| | CASEMENT WINDOWS SIZES AS SHOWN ON WINDOW SCHEDULE FOR |
| | BEDROOM #1 AND STUDY (50' X 50" AND 62" X 50"). NOA |
| | 12-1220.14 SUBMITTED DOESN'T INCLUDE THESE SIZES. |
| | WINDOW SCHEDULE SPECIFIES "SINGLE CASEMENT TO LOOK LIKE |
| | SINGLE HUNG". NEED TO SHOW COMPLIANCE WITH THE EGRESS |
| | REQUIREMENTS OF SEC. R310. |
| | |
| | 5- ATTIC ACCESS SIZE SPECIFIED FOR THE ONE STORY |
| | ADDITION AND THE TWO STORY ADDITION DON'T COMPLY WITH |
| | SEC. R807. REVISE AS REQUIRED. |
| | ***NOTE: BE AWARE THAT LOCATION OF A/C UNITS NEED TO |
| | COMPLY WITH SEC. M1305 OF 2010 FBC-RESIDENTIAL. |
| | |
| | 6- PROVIDE PRODUCT APPROVAL (2 COPIES) AS REQUIRED BY |
| | DCA RULE 9N-3 FOR: |
| | A) ALL SIMPSON STRUCTURAL CONNECTORS SPECIFIED ON PLANS |
| | AND ALL DETAILS. ***NOTE: PROVIDE ONLY THE PRODUCT |
| | APPROVAL COVER PAGE AND PAGE SHOWING THE SPECIFIED |
| | CONNECTOR. (NOT SUBMITTED). |
| | |
| | B) OVERHEAD GARAGE DOOR. NOA 08-0320.05 SUBMITTED |
| | EXPIRED ON AUGUST 21/2013. NEED CURRENT NOA. |
| | |
| | C) CONCRETE ROOF TILE ADHESIVE. NOA 12-0228.18 |
| | SUBMITTED WAS SUPERSEDED BY MIAMI-DADE. NEED CURRENT |
| | NOA. VISIT THE MIAMI-DADE WEBSITE AND DOWNLOAD CURRENT |
| | NOA. |
| | |
| | D) SHUTTERS SHOWN ON PROPOSED CABANA WEST ELEVATION. |
| | AND, PROVIDE COMPLETE INSTALLATION SCHEDULE. |
| | |
| | 7- ENGINEER OF RECORD TO REVIEW AND APPROVE IN WRITING |
| | ABOVE PRODUCT APPROVALS AS REQUIRED BY SEC. 107.3.4.1 |
| | OF CITY AMENDMENTS. |
| | |
| | 8- PROVIDE MANUFACTURER'S ICC EVALUATION REPORT FOR THE |
| | NEW ICYNENE INSULATION SPECIFIED ON PLANS TO VERIFY |
| | COMPLIANCE WITH ENERGY CALCULATIONS REQUIREMENTS AND |
| | INSULATION LIMITATIONS. SEC. 107.2.1 CITY AMENDMENTS. |
| | |
| | 9- ENGINEER TO REVISE CALCULATIONS ON SHEET S-7: |
| | A) BUILDING EXPOSURE IS "C" NOT "B". SEC. R301.2.1.4.3. |
| | |
| | B) THE NOMINAL WIND SPEED FOR THE CITY OF WEST PALM |
| | BEACH IS 132MPH NOT 131.7. R301.2.1.4.3. |
| | |
| | C) REVISE THE WINDOWS AND DOORS DESIGN PRESSURES. NEED |
| | DESIGN PRESSURES ACCORDING TO EXPOSURE "C" AND |
| | ACCORDING TO THE MEAN ROOF HEIGHT OF EACH BUILDING. TWO |
| | STORY ADDITION AND ONE STORY ADDITION. SEC. |
| | R301.2.1.4.3 |
| | ***NOTE: COORDINATE WITH DESIGN PRESSURES SHOWN ON |
| | WINDOW AND DOOR SCHEDULE ON SHEET A400. |
| | |
| | 10- REVISE ENERGY CALCULATIONS SUBMITTED FOR THE MAIN |
| | HOUSE AND PROVIDE 2 COPIES. ONLY ONE COPY WAS SUBMITTED |
| | (SEC. 103.2.1.1.2 OF 2010 FBC-ENERGY CONSERVATION): |
| | A) ENGINEER DOING THE CALCULATIONS NEED TO SIGN AND |
| | SEAL THEM WITH ORIGINAL SEAL AND SIGNATURE AS REQUIRED |
| | BY CHAPTER 471. DIGITAL SIGNATURE ONLY APPLIES TO |
| | ELECTRONICALLY SUBMITTED DOCUMENTS, NOT HARD COPY |
| | DOCUMENTS. |
| | |
| | B) REVISE THE AREA WEIGHTED AVERAGE OVERHANG DEPTH TO |
| | MATCH PLANS. (REPEAT COMMENT). |
| | |
| | C) REVISE WINDOW INFORMATION ON SHEET 3 OF 5 TO MATCH |
| | PLANS AND PRODUCT APPROVALS. . THERE ARE NOT WOOD |
| | WINDOWS. AND, REVISE THE OVERHANG DEPTH AND SEPARATION |
| | TO MATCH PLANS. |
| | |
| | D) OWNER/AGENT TO CERTIFY AND DATE BOTTOM OF FORM. |
| | |
| | E) COMPLETE ALL THE INFORMATION ON TOP OF FORM, |
| | INCLUDING THE BUILDER NAME, ETC. |
| | |
| | F) PROVIDE MANUFACTURER'S SPECS SHOWING HOW PROVIDING |
| | R19 INSULATION ON THE DUCTS AS SPECIFIED ON ITEM #11. |
| | |
| | G) INFORMATION SHOWN ON ITEMS #12 AND #13 TO MATCH |
| | INFORMATION SHOWN ON THE A/C EQUIPMENT SIZING |
| | CALCULATIONS. REVISE AS REQUIRE TO MATCH. |
| | |
| | 11- REVISE ENERGY CALCULATIONS SUBMITTED FOR THE CABANA |
| | AND PROVIDE 2 COPIES. ONLY ONE COPY WAS SUBMITTED. |
| | (SEC. 103.2.1.1.2 OF 2010 FBC-ENERGY CONSERVATION): |
| | A) SEE COMMENTS TO MAIN HOUSE AND REVISE ALL THAT APPLY |
| | TO THE CABANA. |
| | |
| | B) PROVIDE ICYNENE ICC EVALUATION REPORT SHOWING HOW |
| | PROVIDING R45 INSULATION IN THE CEILING ASSEMBLY AS |
| | SHOWN ON ITEM #10.. |
| | |
| | 12- SHEET A100 SHOWS A DOOR FOR THE CABANA STORAGE, BUT |
| | DOOR SCHEDULE AND ELEVATIONS DON'T SHOW ANY. REVISE AS |
| | REQUIRED TO MATCH. PROVIDE PRODUCT APPROVAL IF DOOR IS |
| | GOING TO BE INSTALLED. DCA RULE 9N-3. |
| | |
| | |
| | ***THE FOLLOWING ARE NEW ITEMS BASED ON THE PLANS |
| | SUBMITTED: |
| | |
| | 13- STRUCTURAL PLANS SUBMITTED ARE LACKING A LOT OF |
| | INFORMATION: MAIN HOUSE: NEED COMPLETE FRAMING DETAILS |
| | AND SPECIFICATION FOR ALL 2X6 ROOF FRAMING MEMBERS |
| | INCLUDING ALL THE CONNECTORS (CONNECTIONS AT RIDGE |
| | BEAMS, COLLAR TIES, ETC). NO INFORMATION GIVEN FOR THE |
| | TRELLIS CONSTRUCTION, NO INFORMATION GIVEN FOR THE |
| | GATES AND WALL CONSTRUCTION. CLARIFY IF CABANA ROOF |
| | FRAMING MEMBERS ARE PRE-ENGINEERED TRUSSES OR 2X6 ROOF |
| | RAFTERS (FRAMING PLANS AND WALL SECTIONS SUBMITTED |
| | CONTRADICT EACH OTHER). HOW DO YOU SECURE COLLAR TIES |
| | TO THE WALL WITH SIMPSON HETAL 18 CONNECTORS AS SHOWN |
| | ON MAIN HOUSE AND CABANA WALL SECTIONS?. ROOF FRAMING |
| | PLAN #1 ON SHEET S-3 DOESN'T MATCH BUILDING SECTION #1 |
| | ON SHEET S-5 (LOOK AT THE LOCATION OF RIDGE BEAMS). |
| | CABANA FLOOR FRAMING PLAN: SPECIFY SPACING OF 2X4 STUDS |
| | ON INTERIOR BEARING WALL AND SPECIFY HEADER SIZES AND |
| | SUPPORTING POSTS AT DOORS OPENINGS. SEC. R301.1 |
| | |
| | 14- SHEET S-6: |
| | A) FIRST RISER HEIGHT DOESN'T COMPLY WITH SEC. |
| | R311.7.4.1. |
| | |
| | B) TREADS NEED A NOSING AS REQUIRED BY SEC. R311.7.4.3. |
| | |
| | C) SPECIFY HANDRAIL HEIGHT. SEC. R311.7.7.1. |
| | |
| | D) FOOTING INFORMATION DOESN'T MATCH FOUNDATION PLAN. |
| | REVISE AS REQUIRED. SEC. 107.2.1 CITY AMENDMENTS. |
| | |
| | 15- STRUCTURAL DRAWINGS ARE ALSO MISSING THE STRUCTURAL |
| | BUCK DETAILS FOR GARAGE DOOR, ALL NEW EXTERIOR DOORS |
| | AND WINDOWS. SEC. R301.1. |
| | ***NOTE: WHEN SPECIFYING BUCK SIZES TAKE INTO |
| | CONSIDERATION THAT DOORS AND WINDOWS BUCKS REQUIRE |
| | FRAME FULL SUPPORT. SEE SEC. R612.10. |
| | |
| | *** IN ORDER TO EXPEDITE THE REVIEW PROCESS, PLEASE |
| | PROVIDE RESPONSE LETTER ADDRESSING EACH ITEM. |
| | |
| | IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS, PLEASE CALL |
| | JULIO GOMEZ |
| | COMMERCIAL COMBINATION, PLANS EXAMINER |
| | (561)805-6712 |
