| Date |
Text |
| 2013-08-08 12:28:45 | RESIDENTIAL (R3) RE-ROOF, BUILDING REVIEW COMMENTS. |
| | CODE: 2010 FBC. |
| | |
| | 1- ACCORDING TO PROPERTY APPRAISER THE HOUSE WAS |
| | DESIGNED WITH SHINGLES. RE-ROOF PERMIT APPLICATION |
| | SUBMITTED IS FOR CONCRETE TILE. NEED TO PROVIDE |
| | ENGINEERING CALCULATIONS SHOWING THAT THE EXISTING |
| | STRUCTURE IS CAPABLE OF SUPPORTING THE ADDITIONAL LOAD. |
| | SEC. 107.2.1.3 OF CITY AMENDMENTS TO FBC. |
| | |
| | 2- ACCORDING TO THE LIMITATIONS OF BORAL ROOFING |
| | UNDERLAYMENT SUBMITTED THE FRSA/TRI 07320 DOESN'T |
| | ADDRESS WIND UPLIFT RESISTANCE OF DIRECT-DECK |
| | UNDERLAYMENTS SYSTEMS BENEATH A FOAM-ON TILE ATTACHMENT |
| | SYSTEM (SEE COPY OF LIMITATION #5.5.2 BELOW). |
| | THEREFORE, THE UPLIFT LIMITATION IS -45PSF (SEE COPY OF |
| | LIMITATION #5.5.2.1 BELOW). THIS LIMITATION DOESN'T |
| | MEET THE DESIGN PRESSURES REQUIRED BY SEC. R301.1 OF |
| | 2010 FBC-RESIDENTIAL. |
| | |
| | *****UNDERLAYMENT LIMITATIONS FROM FLORIDA PRODUCT |
| | APRPOVAL FL14317-R4 SUBMITTED: |
| | |
| | 5.5.2 |
| | FRSA/TRI 07320 DOES NOT ADDRESS WIND UPLIFT RESISTANCE |
| | OF DIRECT-DECK, ADHERED UNDERLAYMENT SYSTEMS BENEATH |
| | FOAM-ON TILE SYSTEMS, WHERE THE BONDED UNDERLAYMENT |
| | FORMS PART OF THE LOAD-PATH. THE FOLLOWING WIND UPLIFT |
| | LIMITATIONS APPLY TO DIRECT-DECK, ADHERED BORAL |
| | UNDERLAYMENT SYSTEMS. |
| | 5.5.2.1 |
| | MAXIMUM DESIGN PRESSURE = -45 PSF. |
| | DECK: MIN. 15/32-INCH PLYWOOD TO MEET PROJECT |
| | REQUIREMENTS TO SATISFACTION OF AHJ. |
| | PRIMER: (OPTIONAL) ASTM D41 |
| | BASE LAYER: (OPTIONAL) CITADEL PLUS, SELF-ADHERED |
| | UNDERLAYMENT: BORAL TILESEALHT, SELF-ADHERED |
| | |
| | IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS, PLEASE CALL |
| | JULIO GOMEZ |
| | COMMERCIAL COMBINATION PLANS EXAMINER |
| | (561)805-6712 |
| | |
| | |
| | |
