| Plan Review Notes For Permit 13061001 |
| Permit Number |
13061001 |
|
| Review Stop |
B |
| Sequence Number |
2 |
|
| Notes |
| Date |
Text |
| 2013-08-31 14:29:26 | ***COURTESY REVIEWS WERE PERFORMED VIA EMAIL** | | | | | | EMAIL FROM 8/31: | | | | | | BEFORE I DO ANOTHER COURTESY REVIEW, PLEASE REFER TO MY | | | COMMENT LIST, AND THEN CIRCLE OR HIGHLIGHT ON THE TEST | | | YOU WISH FOR ME TO REVIEW THE TEST STANDARD USED. THERE | | | SHOULD BE A TOTAL OF 3 (IIC, STC, FLAME SPREAD). | | | | | | IF YOU CANNOT FIND THE TEST CIRCLED REFERENCED IN THE | | | COMMENT LIST, THEY'D NEED TO SUBMIT A REQUEST FOR | | | ALTERNATIVE MATERIALS AND METHODS TO PROVIDE DATA TO | | | JUSTIFY WHY THEY ELECTED TO USE A DIFFERENT TEST, OR A | | | DIFFERENT METHOD, OR PROVIDE DATA/ENGINEERING TO SHOW | | | WHY THEY DO NOT NEED TO PERFORM THE TEST PRESCRIBED BY | | | THE FBC AND IBC (THEREFORE A NATIONAL REQUIREMENT | | | ANYWHERE THAT USES THE ICC AS BASE CODE). ALSO CHECK | | | THAT NONE OF THE TESTS INCLUDE A SUSPENDED DRYWALL | | | CEILING. | | | | | | I STARTED TO LOOK AT THE DOCUMENTS - THE FIRST HAD A | | | SUSPENDED CEILING. THE SECOND DID NOT MEET THE | | | REQUIREMENTS OF THE STANDARDS OF THE TEST. PLEASE TAKE | | | THE TIME TO READ THE TEST REPORTS BEFORE SENDING. BY | | | NOW YOU SHOULD BE AN EXPERT! | | | | | | AFTER YOU CONFIRM THAT, TO THE BEST OF YOUR KNOWLEDGE, | | | THE PRODUCT MEETS THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE FBC, PLEASE | | | FEEL FREE TO SEND TO ME. |
|
