| Date |
Text |
| 2014-06-04 15:46:16 | FAILED |
| | |
| | PLEASE PROVIDE WRITTEN RESPONSES. |
| | |
| | 1) REPEAT COMMENT: PURSUANT TO RESOLUTION NO. 288-11, A |
| | CONSTRUCTION SITE SECURITY AND MANAGEMENT PLAN SHALL BE |
| | SUBMITTED TO THE CITY'S POLICE DEPARTMENT CRIME |
| | PREVENTION THROUGH ENVIRONMENTAL DESIGN ("CPTED") |
| | OFFICIAL AND APPROVED PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF THE |
| | BUILDING PERMIT. (CONTRARY TO THE RESPONSE COMMENT, NO |
| | PLAN HAS BEEN SUBMITTED TO OFFICER KELLY CARSILLO) |
| | |
| | I) THE APPLICANT, AFTER SITE CLEARING AND PLACEMENT OF |
| | CONSTRUCTION TRAILERS, SHALL INSTITUTE SECURITY |
| | MEASURES TO REDUCE OR ELIMINATE OPPORTUNITIES FOR |
| | THEFT. THE MANAGEMENT PLAN SHALL INCLUDE, BUT NOT TO BE |
| | LIMITED TO, TEMPORARY LIGHTING, SECURITY PERSONNEL, |
| | VEHICLE BARRIERS, CONSTRUCTION/VISITOR PASS, |
| | REDUCE/MINIMIZE ENTRY/EXIT POINTS, ENCOURAGE |
| | SUBCONTRACTORS TO SECURE MACHINERY AND TOOLS AT END OF |
| | WORK DAY AND/OR ANY OTHER MEASURE DEEMED APPROPRIATE TO |
| | PROVIDE A SAFE AND SECURE WORKING ENVIRONMENT. |
| | II) THE SECURITY MANAGEMENT PLAN SHALL BE MAINTAINED |
| | THROUGHOUT THE CONSTRUCTION PHASE OF THE PROJECT. |
| | NON-COMPLIANCE WITH THE APPROVED PLAN SHALL RESULT IN A |
| | STOP-WORK ORDER FOR THE ENTIRE PLANNED DEVELOPMENT. |
| | |
| | 2) REPEAT COMMENT: IN ACCORDANCE WITH RESOLUTION NO. |
| | 288-11, ALL ROOF MOUNTED AIR CONDITIONING, MECHANICAL |
| | EQUIPMENT, SATELLITE DISHES, GENERATORS, ETC., SHALL BE |
| | SCREENED FROM VIEW ON ALL SIDES BY A VISUALLY OPAQUE |
| | BARRIER CONSISTENT WITH THE COLOR, CHARACTER AND |
| | ARCHITECTURAL STYLE OF THE STRUCTURES OR EQUIVALENT |
| | LANDSCAPE MATERIAL. THE HEIGHT OF THE OPAQUE BARRIER |
| | SHALL BE AS REQUIRED TO PROVIDE AMPLE SCREENING. |
| | PROVIDE VERIFICATION THAT THE ROOFTOP MECHANICAL |
| | EQUIPMENT WILL BE SCREENED AS REQUIRED BY THE |
| | RESOLUTION FOR THE SPECIFIC EQUIPMENT PROPOSED FOR |
| | INSTALLATION (EX. LINE OF SIGHT OR ELEVATIONS WITH THE |
| | EQUIPMENT). |
| | |
| | 3) REPEAT COMMENT: THE APPROVED ELEVATIONS FOR BUILDING |
| | #7 HAVE CHANGED. THE ZONING STAFF HAS NOT APPROVED THE |
| | REVISED ELEVATIONS, SPECIFICALLY: |
| | |
| | A. THE PREVIOUS MINOR AMENDMENT APPROVAL FOR BUILDING |
| | #7 PERMITTED THE REDUCTION OF THE CITY COMMISSION |
| | APPROVED 9 DOORS TO 3 DOORS ON THE NORTHERN ELEVATION, |
| | PROVIDED THAT WINDOWS ARE PROVIDED IN THEIR PLACE WHERE |
| | THE 6 DOORS HAD BEEN. THE TWO END BAY LOCATIONS SHALL |
| | INCLUDE WINDOWS, NOT STUCCO DESIGNED TO LOOK SIMILAR TO |
| | A WINDOW. |
| | |
| | 4) NEW COMMENT: THE REVISED NORTH/SOUTH BUILDING |
| | DIMENSION TO ACCOMMODATE THE 12,000 SQUARE FOOT |
| | BUILDING IS NOT REFLECTED ON THE CONSTRUCTION LAYOUT |
| | SURVEY. THE NORTH SETBACK (19.5 FEET) DOES NOT COMPLY |
| | WITH THE SETBACK APPROVED ON THE SITE PLAN (20.4 FEET). |
| | |
| | 5) REPEAT COMMENT: PROVIDE A COPY OF THE REVISED SITE |
| | PLAN APPROVED BY ZONING THROUGH THE MINOR AMENDMENT |
| | PROCESS. |
| | |
| | SEPTATE PERMITS, WITH PLANS, ARE REQUIRED FOR THE |
| | FOLLOWING: |
| | |
| | A. LANDSCAPE REQUIRES A SEPARATE PERMIT APPLICATION FOR |
| | EACH PARCEL (TRACT A & TRACT F) ON WHICH WORK IS BEING |
| | DONE. THE SAME 2 COPIES OF THE LANDSCAPE PLAN MAY BE |
| | USED FOR BOTH APPLICATIONS (SUBJECT TO CONCURRENT |
| | SUBMITTAL). A COST ESTIMATE IS REQUIRED WITH THE |
| | SUBMITTAL. |
| | B. SIGNAGE |
| | C. AWNINGS |
| | D. PARKING LOT STRIPING |
| | E. BICYCLE RACKS |
| | |
| | CONTACT ERIC SCHNEIDER @ (561) 822-1446. |
| 2014-05-15 16:25:09 | 5/15/14 |
