| Date |
Text |
| 2014-06-04 18:12:20 | FAILED |
| | |
| | PLEASE PROVIDE WRITTEN RESPONSES. |
| | |
| | 1) REPEAT COMMENT: PURSUANT TO RESOLUTION NO. 288-11, A |
| | CONSTRUCTION SITE SECURITY AND MANAGEMENT PLAN SHALL BE |
| | SUBMITTED TO THE CITY'S POLICE DEPARTMENT CRIME |
| | PREVENTION THROUGH ENVIRONMENTAL DESIGN ("CPTED") |
| | OFFICIAL AND APPROVED PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF THE |
| | BUILDING PERMIT. (CONTRARY TO THE RESPONSE COMMENT, NO |
| | PLAN HAS BEEN SUBMITTED TO OFFICER KELLY CARSILLO) |
| | |
| | I) THE APPLICANT, AFTER SITE CLEARING AND PLACEMENT OF |
| | CONSTRUCTION TRAILERS, SHALL INSTITUTE SECURITY |
| | MEASURES TO REDUCE OR ELIMINATE OPPORTUNITIES FOR |
| | THEFT. THE MANAGEMENT PLAN SHALL INCLUDE, BUT NOT TO BE |
| | LIMITED TO, TEMPORARY LIGHTING, SECURITY PERSONNEL, |
| | VEHICLE BARRIERS, CONSTRUCTION/VISITOR PASS, |
| | REDUCE/MINIMIZE ENTRY/EXIT POINTS, ENCOURAGE |
| | SUBCONTRACTORS TO SECURE MACHINERY AND TOOLS AT END OF |
| | WORK DAY AND/OR ANY OTHER MEASURE DEEMED APPROPRIATE TO |
| | PROVIDE A SAFE AND SECURE WORKING ENVIRONMENT. |
| | II) THE SECURITY MANAGEMENT PLAN SHALL BE MAINTAINED |
| | THROUGHOUT THE CONSTRUCTION PHASE OF THE PROJECT. |
| | NON-COMPLIANCE WITH THE APPROVED PLAN SHALL RESULT IN A |
| | STOP-WORK ORDER FOR THE ENTIRE PLANNED DEVELOPMENT. |
| | |
| | 2) REPEAT COMMENT: IN ACCORDANCE WITH RESOLUTION NO. |
| | 288-11, ALL ROOF MOUNTED AIR CONDITIONING, MECHANICAL |
| | EQUIPMENT, SATELLITE DISHES, GENERATORS, ETC., SHALL BE |
| | SCREENED FROM VIEW ON ALL SIDES BY A VISUALLY OPAQUE |
| | BARRIER CONSISTENT WITH THE COLOR, CHARACTER AND |
| | ARCHITECTURAL STYLE OF THE STRUCTURES OR EQUIVALENT |
| | LANDSCAPE MATERIAL. THE HEIGHT OF THE OPAQUE BARRIER |
| | SHALL BE AS REQUIRED TO PROVIDE AMPLE SCREENING. |
| | PROVIDE VERIFICATION THAT THE ROOFTOP MECHANICAL |
| | EQUIPMENT WILL BE SCREENED AS REQUIRED BY THE |
| | RESOLUTION FOR THE SPECIFIC EQUIPMENT PROPOSED FOR |
| | INSTALLATION (EX. LINE OF SIGHT OR ELEVATIONS WITH THE |
| | EQUIPMENT). |
| | |
| | 3) NEW COMMENT: THE ELEVATION SUBMITTED WITH THE MINOR |
| | AMENDMENT DOES NOT MATCH THE ELEVATION SUBMITTED WITH |
| | THE BUILDING PERMIT - THE WINDOW ON THE SOUTH ELEVATION |
| | HAS BEEN REMOVED ON THE BUILDING PERMIT SUBMITTAL. THIS |
| | IS INTERNAL TO THE SITE, SO STAFF DOES NOT OBJECT TO |
| | THE REMOVAL OF THE WINDOW; HOWEVER, ALL PLANS SHALL |
| | MATCH. |
| | |
| | 4) NEW COMMENT: THE CONSTRUCTION LAYOUT SURVEY |
| | INCORRECTLY DISPLAYS THE LENGTH OF THE SOUTH SECTION OF |
| | THE BUILDING (90 FEET INSTEAD OF 94 FEET). THE SOUTH |
| | SETBACK (23.4 FEET) DOES NOT COMPLY WITH THE SETBACK |
| | APPROVED ON THE SITE PLAN (19FEET). |
| | |
| | 5) REPEAT COMMENT: PROVIDE A COPY OF THE REVISED SITE |
| | PLAN APPROVED BY ZONING THROUGH THE MINOR AMENDMENT |
| | PROCESS. |
| | |
| | SEPARATE PERMITS, WITH PLANS, ARE REQUIRED FOR THE |
| | FOLLOWING: |
| | |
| | A. LANDSCAPE REQUIRES A SEPARATE PERMIT APPLICATION FOR |
| | EACH PARCEL (TRACT A & TRACT F) ON WHICH WORK IS BEING |
| | DONE. THE SAME 2 COPIES OF THE LANDSCAPE PLAN MAY BE |
| | USED FOR BOTH APPLICATIONS (SUBJECT TO CONCURRENT |
| | SUBMITTAL). A COST ESTIMATE IS REQUIRED WITH THE |
| | SUBMITTAL. |
| | B. SIGNAGE |
| | C. AWNINGS |
| | D. PARKING LOT STRIPING |
| | E. BICYCLE RACKS |
| | |
| | CONTACT ERIC SCHNEIDER @ (561) 822-1446. |
| 2014-05-15 16:21:21 | 5/15/14 |
