| Date |
Text |
| 2013-06-19 16:52:52 | RESIDENTIAL (R3) ADDITION BUILDING REVIEW COMMENTS. |
| | CODE: 2010 FBC |
| | |
| | 1- AFTER PLANS ARE REVISED, BRING THEM TO PALM BEACH |
| | COUNTY BUILDING (2300 N. JOG RD.) TO VERIFY IF IMPACT |
| | FEES ARE DUE. BRING BACK COUNTY STAMPED PLANS AND COPY |
| | OF THE PAID RECEIPT IF FEES ARE DUE. REQUIRED BY THE |
| | COUNTY IMPACT FEE UNIFIED LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE. |
| | |
| | 2- CARPORT AREA SHEET 3 OF 6: |
| | A) PLANS SHOW INSTALLATION OF NEW GARAGE DOOR IN THE |
| | CARPORT. THIS WILL AFFECT THE STRUCTURAL STABILITY OF |
| | THE HOUSE. THE HOUSE WAS DESIGNED FOR AN OPEN CARPORT. |
| | THE NEW FRONT WALL AND GARAGE DOOR WILL CREATE MORE |
| | WIND LOADS TO THE ROOF ABOVE CARPORT AND SIDE WALLS. |
| | PROVIDE ENGINEERING ANALYSIS FOR THE PROPOSED |
| | INSTALLATION. AND, PROVIDE COMPLETE SPECS AND DETAILS |
| | SHOWING REINFORCEMENT, IF REQUIRED TO RESIST THE |
| | ADDITIONAL LOADS. SEC. 107.2.1.3 CITY AMENDMENTS TO |
| | FBC. ALSO, COORDINATE WITH ITEM #3 BELOW. |
| | |
| | B) PROVIDE COMPLETE DETAIL AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE |
| | GARAGE DOOR STRUCTURAL BUCK DETAIL ATTACHMENT. THIS IS |
| | THE DESIGNER OF RECORD RESPONSIBILITY, NOT THE PRODUCT |
| | APPROVALS AS SPECIFIED ON "GARAGE DOOR BUCKS" NOTE ON |
| | SHEET 3 OF 6. STRUCTURAL BUCK DETAIL TO RESIST THE |
| | DESIGN PRESSURES REQUIRED BY SEC. R301.2.1.4.3 OF 2010 |
| | FBC-RESIDENTIAL. |
| | |
| | 3- PROVIDE PRODUCT APPROVAL (2 COPIES) AS REQUIRED BY |
| | DCA RULE 9N-3 FOR: |
| | A) GARAGE DOOR AS SHOWN ON PLANS. *** NOTE: NEED |
| | PRODUCT APPROVAL FOR GARAGE DOOR THAT IS DESIGNED TO |
| | RECEIVE THE WIND LOADS FROM BOTH SIDES AS SHOWN ON |
| | PLANS. COORDINATE WITH ITEM #2 ABOVE. |
| | |
| | B) ALL SIMPSON STRUCTURAL CONNECTORS SPECIFIED ON |
| | PLANS, DETAILS, SECTIONS AND SPECIFICATIONS. ***NOTE: |
| | PROVIDE ONLY THE PRODUCT APPROVAL COVER PAGE AND PAGE |
| | SHOWING SPECIFIED CONNECTOR. |
| | |
| | C) PRECAST LINTELS AS SPECIFIED ON PLANS. |
| | |
| | 4- ARCHITECT TO REVIEW AND APPROVE IN WRITING (NOT |
| | SIGNING AND SEALING) ALL THE PRODUCT APPROVALS. SEC. |
| | 107.3.4.1 CITY AMENDMENTS. |
| | |
| | 5- SPECIFY ON PLANS CARBON MONOXIDE ALARMS AS REQUIRED |
| | BY SEC. R315 OF 2010 FBC-RESIDENTIAL. |
| | |
| | 6- A) SOIL TEST REPORT SUBMITTED IS INCOMPLETE. IS |
| | MISSING THE ENGINEERING INFORMATION CONTAINED IN A |
| | TYPICAL SOIL TEST REPORT. THE REPORT IS MISSING THE |
| | RECOMMENDATIONS FOR DESIGN, ESTIMATED SETTLEMENT, SOIL |
| | PREPARATION INCLUDING NEW FILL, ETC. SEC. 107.2.1.3 |
| | CITY AMENDMENTS. |
| | |
| | B) ENGINEER SEALING THE REPORT TO USE CURRENT SEAL AS |
| | REQUIRED BY CHAPTER 471 FLORIDA STATUTE. SEAL USED IS |
| | NO LONGER VALID SINCE JANUARY 2006. |
| | |
| | C) PROVIDE SOIL TEST REPORT (2 COPIES) WITH ORIGINAL |
| | ENGINEER'S SEAL AND SIGNATURE, NOT COPY. SEC. 471 |
| | FLORIDA STATUTE. |
| | |
| | 7- VALUED DECLARED IN THE PERMIT APPLICATION IS TOO |
| | LOW. VALUES WAS UPDATED AS REQUIRED BY SEC. 109.3 CITY |
| | AMENDMENTS TO FBC. VALUATION TO INCLUDE SOIL |
| | PREPARATION, ALL LABOR AND MATERIALS, ALL PROFESSIONAL |
| | DESIGN FEES. ESTIMATED VALUE IS $83,040. PERMIT FEE |
| | BALANCE IS $2303.04. |
| | |
| | 8- ARCHITECT TO SPECIFY ON PLANS ALL DEAD AND LIVE |
| | LOADS INCLUDING THE ATTIC LIVE LIVE LOADS AS REQUIRED |
| | BY SEC. R301.1 AND TABLE R301.5 OF 2010 |
| | FBC-RESIDENTIAL. |
| | |
| | 9- PROVIDE MANUFACTURER SPECS FOR THE ICYNENE |
| | INSULATION SPECIFIED ON PLANS AND ENERGY CALCULATIONS. |
| | SEC. 107.2.1 CITY AMENDMENTS TO FBC. |
| | |
| | 10- SOIL TEST REPORT SUBMITTED STATES THAT SOIL BEARING |
| | CAPACITY IS 2,000 PSF. ARCHITECT'S PLANS AND DETAILS |
| | REQUIRE 2500PSF SOIL BEARING CAPACITY. REVISE AS |
| | REQUIRED. SEC. 107.2.1 CITY AMENDMENTS. |
| | |
| | 11- SHEET 5 OF 6: A) REVISE ROOF SHEATHING NOTES: NEED |
| | TO SPECIFY MIN. 8D RING SHANK NAILS AT 4"-0" IN ROOF |
| | ZONE #3 AS REQUIRED BY SEC. R803.2.3.1 OF 2010 |
| | FBC-RESIDENTIAL. |
| | |
| | B) IDENTIFY ROOF SHEATHING ZONES AS REQUIRED BY FIGURE |
| | R803.2.3.1 OF 2010 FBC-RESIDENTIAL. NOTE THAT GABLE END |
| | REQUIRES 5'-0". |
| | |
| | C) SPECIFY TRUSS CONNECTORS FOR TRUSSES THAT ARE GOING |
| | TO BE SUPPORTED ON EXISTING MASONRY WALL BY THE NEW |
| | WALK IN CLOSET. SEC. 107.2.1 CITY AMENDMENTS. |
| | |
| | 12- WALL SECTION ON SHEET 6 OF 6; A) CLARIFY IF ATTIC |
| | IS DESIGNED TO BE VENTED OR UNVENTED. SEC. R806 OF 2010 |
| | FBC-RESIDENTIAL. THERE IS ONE NOTE SAYING "MATCH |
| | EXISTING SOFFIT & VENTS", BUT THERE ARE SPECIFICATIONS |
| | FOR ICYNENE INSULATION IN THE ATTIC. REVISE AS REQUIRED |
| | TO MATCH. COORDINATE WITH ENERGY CALCULATIONS |
| | SUBMITTED. |
| | |
| | B) IF DESIGNING VENTED ATTIC, THEN SPECIFY VENT SIZE |
| | AND SPACING. SEC. R806 OF 2010 FBC-RESIDENTIAL AND SEC. |
| | 103 OF 2010 FBC-ENERGY CONSERVATION. |
| | |
| | C) CLARIFY IF USING THE RIDGE VENT OR NOT. THERE WAS A |
| | PRODUCT APPROVAL SUBMITTED FOR RIDGE VENT. ARCHITECT TO |
| | SPECIFY ON PLANS THE RIDGE VENT IF USING IT. SEC. |
| | 107.2.1 CITY AMENDMENTS. |
| | |
| | D) IF DESIGNING UNVENTED ATTIC, THEN, SPECIFY R-VALUE |
| | FOR THE ICYNENE INSULATION. SEC. 103 OF 2010 FBC-ENERGY |
| | CONSERVATION. |
| | |
| | F) SPECIFY R-VALUE IN WALL INSULATION. COORDINATE WITH |
| | ENERGY CALCULATIONS. SEC. 103 OF 2010 FBC-ENERGY |
| | CONSERVATION. |
| | |
| | 13- TRUSS PACKAGE (CHAPTER 471 FLORIDA STATUTE AND SEC. |
| | 61G15-31.003): |
| | A) TRUSS ENGINEER TO PROVIDE TITLE BLOCK ON EACH SHEET. |
| | |
| | B) TRUSS ENGINEER TO USE CURRENT SEAL. SEAL USED IS NO |
| | VALID SINCE JANUARY 2006. |
| | |
| | C) ALL THE SHEETS NEED TO BE NUMBERED AND COORDINATED |
| | WITH COVER SHEET. |
| | |
| | D) TRUSS ENGINEER NEED TO UPDATE HIS LICENSE WITH DPBR. |
| | |
| | E) DESIGNER OF RECORD TO REVIEW AND APPROVE TRUSS |
| | PACKAGE. PERSON WHO REVIEWED TRUSS PACKAGE IS NOT THE |
| | SAME SIGNING AND SEALING THE PLANS. |
| | |
| | IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS, PLEASE CALL |
| | JULIO GOMEZ |
| | COMMERCIAL COMBINATION PLANS EXAMINER |
| | (561)805-6712 |
