| Date |
Text |
| 2013-06-03 14:26:18 | BUILDING PLAN REVIEW |
| | PERMIT:13050770 |
| | ADD: MASTER PLAN NEW & MODIFIED TROLLEY SHELTERS |
| | CONT: TBD |
| | CONTACT: VIVEK GALAV |
| | TEL: (561)494-1061 |
| | |
| | 2010 FLORIDA BUILDING CODE W |
| | * WEST PALM BEACH ADMINISTRATIVE AMENDMENTS |
| | |
| | 2010 EXISTING BUILDING CODE LEVEL II 701.3 |
| | COMPLIANCE. ALL NEW CONSTRUCTION ELEMENTS, COMPONENTS, |
| | SYSTEMS, AND SPACES SHALL COMPLY WITH THE REQUIREMENTS |
| | OF THE FLORIDA BUILDING CODE, BUILDING. |
| | |
| | 1ST REVIEW |
| | DATE: JUNE 03/ 2013 |
| | ACTION: DENIED |
| | |
| | 1) THE MODIFIED AND NEW TROLLEY SHELTERS ARE GOING TO |
| | BE MASTERED WE WILL NEED THE SHOP DRAWINGS THAT PROVIDE |
| | THE FASTENING DETAILS FOR ALL OF THE FRAMING MEMBERS. |
| | THE 700 SERIES OF SHEETS INDICATE ALL CONNECTIONS ARE |
| | TO BE WELDED OR CONCEALED FASTENERS SHOP DRAWING ARE TO |
| | INCLUDE ALL CONNECTION METHODS FOR ARCHIETECT REVIEW. |
| | 2010 WPB ADMINISTRATIVE CODE, CHAPTER 1 ADMINISTRATION, |
| | 2010 EDITION.107.3.5.1.1(8) MINIMUM PLAN REVIEW |
| | CRITERIA COMMERCIAL BUILDINGS, STRUCTURAL. |
| | |
| | 2) SHEET A2.02 ROOF PLANS FOR NEW AND RENOVATED |
| | SHELTERS ALSO INDICATES THE USE OF SOLAR PHOTOVOLTIAC |
| | SYSTEMS, PLEASE NOTE THIS SYSTEM WILL REQUIRE A |
| | SEPERATE ELECTRICAL PERMIT AND ASSOCIATED FEES. PLEASE |
| | BACK OUT THE VALUE FOR THIS SYSTEM OUT OF THE BUILDING |
| | COST TO BE COVERED UNDER THE PHOTOVOLTIAC ELECTRIC |
| | PERMIT. 109.3 WPB ADMINISTRATIVE CODE, BUILDING PERMIT |
| | VALUATION. |
| | |
| | 3) SHEET A2.02 IN THE ROOFING NOTES DESCRIBES A ROOFING |
| | SYSTEM, KEMPEROL 2K-PUR: FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF |
| | COMMUNITY AFFAIRS RULE 9N-3 NOV. 01/ 2010 (31) |
| | SUB-CATEGORY OF PRODUCTS OR CONSTRUCTION SYSTEMS THAT |
| | WILL REQUIRE PRODUCT APPROVALS: |
| | (31)(A) (D) ROOFING PRODUCTS AND ASSEMBLIES PLEASE |
| | SUBMIT 2 COPIES OF PRODUCT APPROVAL, PLEASE CIRCLE THE |
| | SYSTEM THAT WILL BE ATTACHED TO ALUMINUM TUBING/ DECK |
| | AS DEPICTED ON A2.02. A ENGINEER MAY DO RATIONAL |
| | ANYLSIS IF THE PRODUCT WAS TESTED ON A STEEL DECK TO |
| | THE ALUMINUM DECK/ TUBING. |
| | |
| | 4) SHEET S1.0 INDICATES THE STRUCTURES WERE DESIGNED TO |
| | A "C" EXPOSURE, THE WORST CASE EXPOSURE OCCURS @ DATURA |
| | & FLAGLER A EXPOSURE D LOCATION. |
| | 1609.4.3 EXPOSURE CATEGORIES. EXPOSURE D. EXPOSURE D |
| | SHALL APPLY WHERE THE GROUND SURFACE ROUGHNESS, AS |
| | DEFINED BY SURFACE ROUGHNESS D, PREVAILS IN THE UPWIND |
| | DIRECTION FOR A DISTANCE OF AT LEAST 5,000 FEET (1524 |
| | M) OR 20 TIMES THE HEIGHT OF THE BUILDING, WHICHEVER IS |
| | GREATER. EXPOSURE D SHALL EXTEND INLAND FROM THE |
| | SHORELINE FOR A DISTANCE OF 600 FEET (183 M) OR 20 |
| | TIMES THE HEIGHT OF THE BUILDING, WHICHEVER IS GREATER |
| | FROM AN EXPOSURE D CONDITION AS DEFINED IN THE PREVIOUS |
| | SENTENCE. |
| | |
| | JAMES A. WITMER CBO |
| | SENIOR COMMERCIAL COMBINATION PLANS EXAMINER |
| | TEL: 561-805-6715 |
| | FAX: 561-805-6676 |
| | E-MAIL: [email protected] |
| | |
| | |
| | |
