| Date |
Text |
| 2013-10-19 09:51:48 | ****CORRECTIONS**** |
| | SAMANTHA HILL, BUILDING PLANS EXAMINER |
| | 561-805-6724 [email protected] |
| | FBC FLORIDA BUILDING CODE 2010 |
| | FBC R FLORIDA BUILDING CODE 2010 RESIDENTIAL |
| | |
| | FROM PREVIOUS LIST: |
| | |
| | 1. PROVIDE A STRUCTURAL DETAIL FOR PROPOSED |
| | IMPROVEMENT. SEE FBC 107. PLANS ARE TO INCLUDE WIND |
| | DESIGN CRITERIA FBC R 301. IF PLANS ARE NOT PREPARED BY |
| | A DESIGN PROFESSIONAL, CALCULATIONS MAY BE REQUIRED. AS |
| | NO PLAN WAS SUBMITTED, A COMPLETE CHECKLIST CANNOT BE |
| | PROVIDED. |
| | |
| | PLAN IS TO CLEARLY SHOW MATERIALS AND SCOPE, ALL |
| | STRUCTURAL CONNECTIONS. |
| | |
| | SOME ITEMS INDINCATED AS "METAL"; THIS IS NOT |
| | SUFFICIENT AS IT DOES NOT PROVIDE A STRENGTH CRITERIA |
| | OR MATERIAL. OTHER ITEMS SHOW DIMENSION OF 8X4X1, NOT |
| | CLEAR WHAT THIS MEANS (1 = 1"? NOMINAL?) OR WHAT |
| | MATERIAL IS PROPOSED. 3" SCREWS ARE SHOWN AS |
| | CONNECTORS, NOT CLEAR WHAT TYPE OF SCREWS ARE PROPOSED, |
| | STRENGTH CAPABILITY, OR TYPE. |
| | |
| | PLANS REQUIRED - ARCHITECTURAL QUALITY PLAN, FOUNDATION |
| | PLAN, ELEVATIONS, SECTIONS IF NEEDED. NOT ENOUGH |
| | INFORMATION TO DETERMINE CODE COMPLIANCE. IF PLANS ARE |
| | NOT SIGNED AND SEALED BY A DESIGN PROFESSIONAL, |
| | CALCULATIONS WILL BE REQUIRED FOR ALL SPANS AND |
| | CONNECTORS. |
| | |
| | PLAN DOES NOT INCLUDE WIND DESIGN CRITERIA FBC R 301. |
| | |
| | 2. SITE PLAN TO SHOW LOCATION OF PROPOSED IMPROVEMENT, |
| | DIMENSIONS OF IMPROVEMENT, DISTANCE TO PROPERTY LINES, |
| | AND DISTANCE TO OTHER STRUCTURES, FBC R 302. SITE PLAN |
| | PROVIDED IS NOT LEGIBLE. IT APPEARS TO SHOW DIMENSIONS |
| | OF 100' (OR 180'?) X 330', WHICH IS LARGER THAN LOT |
| | SIZE. |
| | |
| | SURVEY NOT CONSISTENT WITH PROPOSED IMPROVEMENT. IS THE |
| | BRICK AREA TO BE EXTENDED? SEE ORIGINAL COMMENT AND |
| | PROVIDE ALL INFORMATION FOR BOTH PERGOLA AND ANY OTHER |
| | WORK TO BE INCLUDED ON THIS PERMIT SUCH AS INCREASE OF |
| | BRICK AREA. SURVEY FROM 2002 SHOW SCREENED BRICK PATIO |
| | AND ADJACENT BRICK PATIO AS SAME DIMENSION, SITE PLAN |
| | PROVIDED APPEARS TO SHOW A REDUCTION IN THE BRICK PATIO |
| | AND INCREASE IN WHAT WAS FORMERLY CALLED "SCREENED |
| | BRIUCK PATIO" AREA. |
| | |
| | 3. ALL INFORMATION, DRAWINGS, SPECIFICATIONS AND |
| | ACCOMPANYING DATA SHALL BEAR THE NAME AND SIGNATURE OF |
| | THE PERSON RESPONSIBLE FOR THE DESIGN. |
| | |
| | NOT ADDRESSED. |
| | |
| | 4. FBC R TABLE 302.1, PROJECTIONS WHICH ARE LESS THAN |
| | 3' FROM THE PROPERTY LINE ARE REQUIRED TO HAVE A 1 HOUR |
| | FIRE RESISTANCE RATING. IF PROPOSED IMPROVEMENT IS LESS |
| | THAN 3' FROM PROPERTY LINE, PROVIDE A DETAIL FOR FIRE |
| | RESISTANCE RATING. |
| | |
| | CANNOT DETERMINE COMPLIANCE AS DISTANCE TO PROPERTY |
| | LINE NOT PROVIDED. |
| | |
| | 5. VALUE IS TO INCLUDE VALUE OF LABOR AND MATERIALS FBC |
| | 109. FAILURE TO PROVIDE A REASONABLE VALUE MAY CAUSE |
| | PLAN REVIEW DELAYS. AS SCOPE HAS NOT BEEN SHOWN, IT |
| | CANNOT BE DETERMINED AT THIS TIME WHETHER OR NOT VALUE |
| | GIVEN IS REASONABLE. |
| | |
| | NOT ADDRESSED. PROVIDE A COST BREAKDOWN AND COMPLETE |
| | SCOPE FOR THIS PROJECT; NOT CLEAR AT THIS TIME. |
| | |
