| Date |
Text |
| 2013-07-10 08:52:33 | ****CORRECTIONS**** |
| | SAMANTHA HILL, BUILDING PLANS EXAMINER |
| | 561-805-6724 [email protected] |
| | FBC FLORIDA BUILDING CODE 2010 |
| | FBC R FLORIDA BUILDING CODE 2010 RESIDENTIAL |
| | |
| | FROM PREVIOUS LIST: |
| | |
| | 1. OK |
| | |
| | 2. REVISE PLAN TO SHOW OPENINGS FROM THE HOUSE INTO THE |
| | EXISTING PORCH AS WELL AS ROOM DESIGNATIONS. IF A |
| | BEDROOM OPENS INTO THE EXISTING PORCH, SHOW ALTERNATIVE |
| | MEANS OF EMERGENCY ESCAPE AND RESCUE FBC R 310 (TYPE OF |
| | OPENING AND DIMENSIONS OF CLEAR OPENING). |
| | |
| | 2ND REVIEW, PLAN DOES NOT PROVIDE WINDOW CLEAR OPENING |
| | DIMENSION AND DOES NOT SHOW THAT (BASED ON AERIALS) |
| | THERE IS A DOOR FROM THE BEDROOM TO THE EXISTING OPEN |
| | AREA, NOW PROPOSED TO BE ENCLOSED WITH A PORCH (ROOF |
| | PANELS, ACRYLIC WALL PANELS). IT APPEARS THAT YOU |
| | PROPOSE TO REDUCE THE LEVEL OF SAFETY BY ELMINATING A |
| | COMPLIANT EMERGENCY MEANS OF ESCAPE. |
| | |
| | AS SPECIFIC METHOD OF COMPLIANCE WAS NOT STATED (FBC |
| | 2010 EXISTING BUILDING CODE 101.5), A SPECIFIC CODE |
| | SECTION CANNOT BE PROVIDED. PLEASE FEEL FREE TO CONTACT |
| | ME IF YOU NEED FURTHER ASSISTANCE. |
| | |
| | 3RD REVIEW - EXISTING WINDOW DOES NOT COMPLY WITH |
| | EMERGENCY ESCAPE AND RESCUE OPENINGS. THE EXISTING |
| | SLIDING GLASS DOOR DOES COMPLY. YOU NOW PROPOSED TO |
| | ENCLOSE THE PORCH WITH SOLID ACRYLIC PANELS, SO THE |
| | SLIDING GLASS DOOR WILL NO LONGER SERVE AS A COMPLIANT |
| | EMERGENCY ESCAPE AND RESCUE. |
| | |
| | A COMPLIANT WINDOW IS SUGGESTED (CASEMENT, HORIZONTAL |
| | ROLLER). |
| | |
| | PLEASE ALSO NOTE THAT THERE ARE THREE DIFFERENT BOAF |
| | INFORMAL INTERPRETATIONS WHICH ADDRESS THIS ISSUE. |
| | |
| | PLEASE FEEL FREE TO CONTACT ME TO DISCUSS. |
| | |
| | |
