| Date |
Text |
| 2013-05-06 16:46:49 | 2010 FBC |
| | |
| | DENIED BY BUILDING |
| | |
| | 1) SUBMIT TWO COPIES OF A SURFACE WATER DRAINAGE PLAN |
| | THAT SHOWS COMPLIANCE WITH FBCR 401.3. |
| | |
| | 2) SUBMIT 2 SETS OF SIGNED AND SEALED SUBSURFACE SOIL |
| | REPORTS. FBCR 401.4 |
| | |
| | 3) FBCR 302.1 REQUIRES EXTERIOR WALLS LOCATED ON A ZERO |
| | LOT LINE TO HAVE A FIRE RESISTANCE RATING OF ONE HOUR. |
| | SUBMIT TESTING REPORTS AND SPECIFICATIONS SHOWING THAT |
| | THE GLASS BLOCK PANEL WALL SYSTEM THAT IS PROPOSED FOR |
| | THIS WALL HAS A ONE HOUR FIRE RESISTANCE RATING IN |
| | ACCORDANCE WITH ASTM E 119 OR UL 263 WITH EXPOSURE FROM |
| | BOTH SIDES. |
| | |
| | 4) THE VALUE OF $ 243,980.00 APPEARS TO BE |
| | UNDER-ESTIMATED FOR THIS PROJECT. PER CITY AMENDMENTS |
| | 109.3, FOR PERMITTING PURPOSES THE VALUATION OF |
| | BUILDINGS AND SYSTEMS SHALL BE TOTAL REPLACEMENT VALUE |
| | TO INCLUDE STRUCTURAL, ELECTRIC, PLUMBING, MECHANICAL, |
| | INTERIOR FINISH, RELATIVE SITE WORK, ARCHITECTURAL AND |
| | DESIGN FEES, MARKETING COSTS, OVERHEAD AND PROFIT; |
| | EXCLUDING ONLY LAND VALUE. THE VALUE WILL BE CHANGED TO |
| | $513920.00 BASED ON LATEST ICC BUILDING VALUATION DATA. |
| | |
| | 5) SUBMIT TWO COPIES OF THE MANUFACTURER'S INSTALLATION |
| | INSTRUCTIONS AND LISTING INFORMATION FOR THE OUTDOOR |
| | BBQ. FBCR M1901.2 & FBCR G2408.1 |
| | |
| | 6) SUBMIT TWO COPIES OF THE PRODUCT APPROVALS FOR THE |
| | ONE HOUR FIRE-RATED GLASS BLOCK, THE PRE-CAST LINTELS |
| | AND THE SIMPSON MBHU GIRDER TRUSS HANGER AS REQUIRED BY |
| | DCA RULE 9N-3. |
| | |
| | 7) THE DESIGNER OF RECORD IS REQUIRED TO REVIEW AND |
| | APPROVE THE PRODUCT APPROVALS IN WRITING. CITY |
| | AMENDMENT 107.3.4.1 |
| | |
| | 8) SPECIFY THE EMBED DEPTH / LENGTH OF THE 3/4" |
| | DIAMETER ANCHOR BOLTS FOR THE DOUBLE 2 X 10 LEDGER AND |
| | THE THREE MEMBER GIRDER SHOWN IN DETAIL 2 ON S-2. CITY |
| | AMENDMENTS 107.2.1 |
| | |
| | 9) THE ENERGY CALCULATIONS AND EQUIPMENT SIZING |
| | CALCULATIONS HAVE THE WRONG ORIENTATION. THE FRONT DOOR |
| | OF THE STRUCTURE FACES EAST NOT SOUTHWEST AS SHOWN IN |
| | THE CALCULATIONS. PLEASE REVISE. FBC ENERGY 405.4 AND |
| | CITY AMENDMENTS 107.2.1 |
| | |
| | 10) THE UPLIFT PRESSURES FOR THE ROOF LISTED ON THE |
| | COVER SHEET ARE TOO LOW FOR A TWO STORY STRUCTURE |
| | LOCATED IN EXPOSURE CATEGORY C WITH A 170 MPH ULTIMATE/ |
| | 132 MPH ASD WINDSPEED. PLEASE REVISE. FBC R301.2.1 |
| | |
| | 11) THE ARCHITECTURAL AND ELECTRICAL DRAWINGS SHOW |
| | THREE (3) A/C SYSTEMS AND THE MECHANICAL PLANS SHOW TWO |
| | (2). PLEASE COORDINATE THE DRAWINGS. CITY AMENDMENTS |
| | 107.2.1 |
| | |
| | NOTE: WHEN RESUBMITTING PLEASE PROVIDE A RESPONSE |
| | LETTER INDICATING HOW EACH OF THE REVIEW COMMENTS HAS |
| | BEEN ADDRESSED. |
| | |
| | |
| | TRUSS DRAWING REVIEW DENIED BY BUILDING |
| | |
| | 1) THE ORIGINAL WET SIGNATURE OF THE TRUSS ENGINEER AS |
| | WELL AS HIS SEAL IS REQUIRED ON THE TRUSS LAYOUT AND |
| | THE TRUSS DRAWINGS PER FS 471.025 AND FAC 61G15-23.002. |
| | |
| | 2) THE STRUCTURAL DESIGNER OF RECORD IS REQUIRED TO |
| | REVIEW AND APPROVE THE TRUSS DRAWINGS AND LAYOUT. |
| | 61G15-31.003 |
| | |
| | 3) THE UPLIFT AT THE CENTER BEARING POINT OF TRUSS P06 |
| | IS -2323 PSF, WHICH EXCEEDS THE SPECIFIED ANCHOR |
| | CAPACITY ON THE STRUCTURAL PLANS. PLEASE REVIEW AND |
| | CORRECT. CITY AMENDMENTS 107.2.1 AND FBC R802.1.6.5 |
| | |
| | ROBERT MCDOUGAL |
| | BLDG. PLAN REVIEW |
| | (561)805-6714 |
| | [email protected] |
| | |
