| Plan Review Notes For Permit 13020388 |
| Permit Number |
13020388 |
|
| Review Stop |
B |
| Sequence Number |
2 |
|
| Notes |
| Date |
Text |
| 2013-03-21 15:23:01 | ****CORRECTIONS**** | | | SAMANTHA HILL, BUILDING PLANS EXAMINER | | | 561-805-6724 [email protected] | | | FBC FLORIDA BUILDING CODE 2010 | | | FBC R FLORIDA BUILDING CODE 2010 RESIDENTIAL | | | | | | 1. AN ATTEMPT WAS MADE TO REDLINE THE PLAN. HOWEVER, | | | THE FOLLOWING ISSUES PREVENTED A REDLINE: | | | | | | THREE DIFFERENT PRODUCT APPROVALS SUBMITTED, NOT CLEAR | | | WHICH PRODUCT IS PROPOSED | | | | | | SUBSTRATE WAS STATED AS BLOCK, BUT OPENING 8 IS OVER | | | 12'. NOT CLEAR WHICH PRODUCT APPROVAL I'M TO USE FOR | | | REVIEW BUT THIS SPAN IS TOO LARGE FOR SOME OF THE | | | PRODUCTS. | | | | | | IT IS SUGGESTED TO SELECT A PRODUCT APPROVAL, PROVIDE | | | TWO SETS OF THE INSTALLATION SCHEDULE, AND CIRCLE | | | ANCHOR SPACING ON THE PRODUCT APPROVAL TO ASSIST IN | | | PLAN REVIEW IF PROPOSED INSTALLATION IS NOT CLEAR BASED | | | ON THE INSTALLATION SCHEDULE. (ONE WAS MAINLY BLANK, | | | THE OTHER HAD EVERYTHING COMPLETED EXCEPT FOR ANCHOR | | | SPACING). |
|
