| Date |
Text |
| 2013-04-22 09:23:17 | 610 EVERNIA STREET |
| | PERMIT #13010504 |
| | REVIEW COMMENTS - FIRE DEPARTMENT |
| | |
| | RESPONSE COMMENT (04/22/13): THE ARCHITECTURAL RESPONSE |
| | LETTER INDICATES FIRE PROTECTION DRAWINGS FP-1 THROUGH |
| | FP-12 HAVE BEEN UPLOADED; HOWEVER, THESE DRAWINGS COULD |
| | NOT BE FOUND DURING PLAN REVIEW. ALSO, THESE DRAWINGS |
| | DO NOT APPEAR IN THE DRAWING INDEX SHEET T-101. |
| | RESPONSE COMMENT (03/27/13): ENGINEERED CONTRUCTION |
| | DOCUMENTS ARE REQUIRED BEFORE ANY SUB- PERMITS WILL BE |
| | ISSUED. |
| | ORIGINAL COMMENT - FOR ISSUANCE OF A GENERAL BUILDING |
| | PERMIT, SECTION 105.3.1.2(2) OF THE FLORIDA BUILDING |
| | CODE REQUIRES SEALED FIRE PROTECTION CONSTRUCTION |
| | DOCUMENTS FOR THE DESIGN OF 50 OR MORE AUTOMATIC FIRE |
| | SPRINKLERS. AFTER THE BUILDING PERMIT HAS BEEN ISSUED, |
| | THE SUBCONTRACTORS CAN THEN SUBMIT SHOP DRAWINGS |
| | (CONFORMING TO THE ENGINEERED CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS) |
| | FOR A SUB-PERMIT. PER FLORIDA ADMINISTRATIVE CODE |
| | SECTION 61G15-32.004, FIRE PROTECTION ENGINEERING |
| | DOCUMENTS SHALL INCLUDE THE POINT OF SERVICE FOR THE |
| | WATER SUPPLY, A LIST OF APPLICABLE NFPA STANDARDS |
| | APPLICABLE TO THE PROJECT, CLASSIFICATION OF HAZARD |
| | OCCUPANCY FOR EACH ROOM OR AREA, SUPPRESSION SYSTEM |
| | TYPE, DESIGN DENSITIES, WATER SUPPLY DATA (FIRE PUMP |
| | DATA, HYDRANT FLOW TEST DATA) AND ANY PERFORMANCE BASED |
| | INFORMATION SUCH AS PRE-ENGINEERED SYSTEMS. |
| | |
| | RESPONSE COMMENT (04/22/13): THE ARCHITECTURAL RESPONSE |
| | LETTER INDICATES FIRE PROTECTION DRAWINGS FP-1 THROUGH |
| | FP-12 HAVE BEEN UPLOADED; HOWEVER, THESE DRAWINGS COULD |
| | NOT BE FOUND DURING PLAN REVIEW. ALSO, THESE DRAWINGS |
| | DO NOT APPEAR IN THE DRAWING INDEX SHEET T-101. |
| | RESPONSE COMMENT (03/27/13): ENGINEERED CONTRUCTION |
| | DOCUMENTS ARE REQUIRED BEFORE ANY SUB- PERMITS WILL BE |
| | ISSUED. |
| | ORIGINAL COMMENT - PROVIDE AN AUTOMATIC CLASS I |
| | STANDPIPE SYSTEM THROUGHOUT THE BUILDING INCLUDING THE |
| | PARKING GARAGE. |
| | |
| | RESPONSE COMMENT (04/22/13): THE ELECTRONIC TRACKING |
| | SOFTWARE INDICATES THIS IS STILL DRAWING VERSION #2 |
| | (SUBMITTED 03/14/13) SO NOTHING HAS BEEN CHANGED SINCE |
| | THE COMMENT. |
| | RESPONSE COMMENT (03/27/13): SEVERAL OF THE DOORS DO |
| | NOT INDICATE THE TYPE OF HARDWARE TO BE USED. ON SHEET |
| | A-202 FOR EXAMPLE, DOORS LOCATED IN CLUBHOUSE #002 HAVE |
| | DOORS #002A (MARK SF-8) AND #002D (MARK F-1) THAT SERVE |
| | AN ASSEMBLY USE WITH AN OCCUPANT LOAD EXCEEDING 100 |
| | PERSONS BUT THE DOOR SCHEDULE DOES NOT INDICATE THE USE |
| | OF PANIC HARDWARE. ANOTHER EXAMPLE IS NORTH STAIR DOOR |
| | #002E (MARK SS15) WHERE THE PLAN STATES, "FIRE EXIT |
| | HARDWARE" BUT THE DOOR SCHEDULE DOES NOT. ON SHEET |
| | A-201, DOOR #G03 (MARK F2) INDICATES PANIC HARDWARE IN |
| | THE SCHEDULE BUT THIS IS A FIRE RATED DOOR NEEDING FIRE |
| | EXIT HARDWARE. THESE ARE JUST SOME EXAMPLES. PLEASE |
| | VERIFY ALL DOORS THROUGHOUT PLANS. |
| | |
| | RESPONSE COMMENT (04/22/13): THE ELECTRONIC TRACKING |
| | SOFTWARE INDICATES THIS IS STILL DRAWING VERSION #2 |
| | (SUBMITTED 03/14/13); NO FLOOR DRAIN SHOWN ON SHEET |
| | P1.2. |
| | RESPONSE COMMENT (03/27/13): STILL NO FLOOR DRAIN SHOWN |
| | ON SHEET P1.2. |
| | REPEAT COMMENT - SHEET P1.2: NO FLOOR DRAIN PROVIDED IN |
| | FIRE PUMP ROOM. |
| | |
| | RESPONSE COMMENT (04/22/13): THE ELECTRONIC TRACKING |
| | SOFTWARE INDICATES THIS IS STILL DRAWING VERSION #1 |
| | (SUBMITTED 02/16/13).THE FLOOR PLAN FOR SHEET MEP1.1 |
| | NEEDS TO BE UPDATED TO REFLECT THE ARCHITECTURAL |
| | CHANGES SHOWING THE 2-HOUR FIRE BARRIER SEPARATION |
| | BETWEEN THE STAIR SHAFT AND TRASH CHUTE. |
| | RESPONSE COMMENT (03/27/13): NON-ESSENTIAL STAIR |
| | EQUIPMENT IS STILL SHOWN ON THE PLAN. |
| | REPEAT COMMENT - SHEET MEP1.1: STAIR SHAFT PENETRATIONS |
| | SHALL BE LIMITED TO EQUIPMENT ESSENTIAL TO THE FUNCTION |
| | OF THE STAIR (SPRINKLERS, STANDPIPES, STAIR |
| | PRESSURIZATION DUCTS, ETC.) |
| | |
| | RESPONSE COMMENT (04/22/13): THE ARCHITECTURAL RESPONSE |
| | LETTER INDICATES FIRE ALARM DRAWINGS FA1.1 THROUGH |
| | FA1.7 HAVE BEEN UPLOADED; HOWEVER, THESE DRAWINGS COULD |
| | NOT BE FOUND DURING PLAN REVIEW. |
| | RESPONSE COMMENT (03/27/13): FIRE ALARM DRAWINGS FA1.1 |
| | THROUGH FA1.7 WERE NOT SUBMITTED FOR REVIEW. ALSO INDEX |
| | SHEET T-101 DOES NOT INDICATE FIRE ALARM DRAWINGS. |
| | ELECTRICAL: NO FIRE ALARM CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS COULD |
| | BE LOCATED. PROVIDE SPEAKER/STROBE NOTIFICATION |
| | APPLIANCES WITH VOICE ANNOUNCEMENTS AND MICROPHONE. |
| | PROVIDE A PRE-RECORDED FIRE ALARM EVACUATION MESSAGE |
| | NOTIFYING OCCUPANTS AN EMERGENCY HAS BEEN REPORTED IN |
| | THE BUILDING, LOCATE THE NEAREST EXIT, AND EXIT THE |
| | BUILDING IMMEDIATELY. DO NOT USE THE ELEVATOR. |
| | |
| | RESPONSE COMMENT (04/22/13): THE ARCHITECTURAL RESPONSE |
| | LETTER INDICATES FIRE ALARM DRAWINGS FA1.1 THROUGH |
| | FA1.7 HAVE BEEN UPLOADED; HOWEVER, THESE DRAWINGS COULD |
| | NOT BE FOUND DURING PLAN REVIEW. |
| | RESPONSE COMMENT (03/27/13): FIRE ALARM DRAWINGS FA1.1 |
| | THROUGH FA1.7 WERE NOT SUBMITTED FOR REVIEW. ALSO INDEX |
| | SHEET T-101 DOES NOT INDICATE FIRE ALARM DRAWINGS. |
| | ELECTRICAL: PROVIDE PHASE 1 RECALL AND PHASE II |
| | FIREFIGHTER EMERGENCY OPERATIONS FOR ELEVATORS. PROVIDE |
| | SMOKE DETECTION IN ELEVATOR LOBBY AND MACHINE ROOM |
| | AREAS. ELEVATOR RECALL SHALL BE INTERFACED WITH FIRE |
| | ALARM SYSTEM. |
| | |
| | RESPONSE COMMENT (04/22/13): THE ARCHITECTURAL RESPONSE |
| | LETTER INDICATES FIRE ALARM DRAWINGS FA1.1 THROUGH |
| | FA1.7 HAVE BEEN UPLOADED; HOWEVER, THESE DRAWINGS COULD |
| | NOT BE FOUND DURING PLAN REVIEW. |
| | RESPONSE COMMENT (03/27/13): FIRE ALARM DRAWINGS FA1.1 |
| | THROUGH FA1.7 WERE NOT SUBMITTED FOR REVIEW. ALSO INDEX |
| | SHEET T-101 DOES NOT INDICATE FIRE ALARM DRAWINGS. |
| | ELECTRICAL: PLANS DO NOT INDICATE THE METHOD (HEAT |
| | DETECTOR/FLOW SWITCH WITHOUT TIME DELAY) USED TO SHUNT |
| | TRIP POWER TO THE ELEVATOR IN THE EVENT AN AUTOMATIC |
| | SPRINKLER ACTIVATES IN THE ELEVATOR MACHINE ROOM. |
| | |
| | RESPONSE COMMENT (04/22/13): THE ARCHITECTURAL RESPONSE |
| | LETTER INDICATES FIRE ALARM DRAWINGS FA1.1 THROUGH |
| | FA1.7 HAVE BEEN UPLOADED; HOWEVER, THESE DRAWINGS COULD |
| | NOT BE FOUND DURING PLAN REVIEW. |
| | RESPONSE COMMENT (03/27/13): FIRE ALARM DRAWINGS FA1.1 |
| | THROUGH FA1.7 WERE NOT SUBMITTED FOR REVIEW. ALSO INDEX |
| | SHEET T-101 DOES NOT INDICATE FIRE ALARM DRAWINGS. |
| | ELECTRICAL: PROVIDE TAMPER SWITCHES FOR SUPERVISING THE |
| | BACKFLOW PREVENTER IN THE OPEN POSITION. |
| | |
| | WESLEY JOLIN |
| | FIRE INVESTIGATOR & INSPECTOR |
| | OFFICE OF THE FIRE MARSHAL |
| | WEST PALM BEACH FIRE RESCUE |
| | [email protected] |
| | (561) 805-6730 |
