| Date |
Text |
| 2013-01-17 10:35:34 | 2010 FBC |
| | |
| | DENIED BY BUILDING |
| | |
| | 1) THE APPRAISAL FOR THE IMPROVEMENTS TO THE SUBJECT |
| | PROPERTY INDICATES THAT THE HOME IS VALUED AT |
| | $200,000.00. THE 2010 FBC ENERGY CONSERVATION SECTION |
| | 101.4.3, REQUIRES THE PORTIONS OF EXISTING BUILDINGS |
| | BEING RENOVATED TO COMPLY WITH TABLE 101.4.1 AS IT |
| | RELATES TO NEW CONSTRUCTION IF THE ESTIMATED COSTS |
| | EXCEEDS 30 PERCENT OF THE ASSESSED VALUE OF THE |
| | STRUCTURE. BECAUSE THE VALUE OF THE PROPOSED WORK ($ |
| | 65,000.00) EXCEEDS 30 PERCENT OF $200,000.00 ($ |
| | 60,000.00), THE WINDOWS, DOORS AND EXTERIOR INSULATION |
| | ( COMPONENTS BEING CHANGED) ARE REQUIRED TO COMPLY WITH |
| | SECTION 402.1 AND THE VALUES LISTED IN TABLE 402.1.1 OR |
| | COMPLY WITH PERFORMANCE-BASE METHOD FOR THE WHOLE HOUSE |
| | IN SECTION 405. SHOW COMPLIANCE. |
| | |
| | 2) THE ENGINEER THAT SIGNED AND SEALED THE DESIGN |
| | PRESSURES FOR THE WINDOW AND DOOR OPENINGS FOR ROYAL |
| | PALM ALUMINUM IS DIFFERENT THAN THE DESIGNER OF RECORD |
| | FOR THE PROJECT. THEIR MAXIMUM DESIGN PRESSURES ARE |
| | ALSO HIGHER THAN THOSE SPECIFIED ON THE PLAN BY THE |
| | DESIGNER OF RECORD. THE ENGINEER IN RESPONSIBLE CHARGE |
| | IS REQUIRED TO REVIEW THE SPECIALTY ENGINEER'S WORK AND |
| | APPROVE IT WITH HIS SHOP DRAWING STAMP. FS 471 |
| | |
| | 3) THE PRODUCT APPROVALS REQUIRED BY DCA RULE 9N-3 |
| | SHALL BE REVIEWED AND APPROVED IN WRITING BY THE |
| | DESIGNER OF RECORD PER CITY AMENDMENTS 107.3.4.1 |
| | |
| | ROBERT MCDOUGAL |
| | BLDG. PLAN REVIEW |
| | (561)805-6714 |
| | [email protected] |
