| Date |
Text |
| 2013-01-22 15:47:31 | NEW SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE (R3) SECOND BUILDING REVIEW |
| | COMMENTS. |
| | CODE: 2010 FBC. |
| | |
| | 1- PLEASE BRING PLANS TO PALM BEACH COUNTY BUILDING TO |
| | PAY THE IMPACT FEES. BRING BACK STAMPED PLANS AND COPY |
| | OF THE PAID RECEIPT. REQUIRED BY COUNTY IMPACT FEE |
| | ORDINANCE OF THE UNIFIED LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE. |
| | |
| | 2- PROVIDE SOIL TEST REPORT (2 COPIES WITH ORIGINAL |
| | SEAL AND SIGNATURE). SEC. R401.4 OF 2010 |
| | FBC-RESIDENTIAL. |
| | |
| | ***RESPONSE TO SUBMITTAL: REPEAT COMMENT. NOT |
| | ADDRESSED. |
| | |
| | 3- ACCORDING TO SEC. R301.2.1.4.3 THIS BUILDING IS |
| | LOCATED ON EXPOSURE "C" NOT "B". NEED TO REVISE THE |
| | BUILDING DESIGN DATA AND ALL THE DESIGN PRESSURES FOR |
| | COMPONENTS AND CLADDING FOR ROOF, DOORS AND WINDOWS |
| | ACCORDINGLY. (NOTE: DESIGN PRESSURES FOR GARAGE DOORS |
| | ARE NOT THE SAME FOR A 18'-0" WIDE DOOR AND FOR A 6'-0" |
| | WIDE DOOR. REVISE AS REQUIRED ALSO). |
| | |
| | ***RESPONSE TO SUBMITTAL: REPEAT COMMENT. NOT |
| | ADDRESSED. |
| | |
| | 4- PROVIDE PRODUCT APPROVALS ( 2 COPIES) AS REQUIRED BY |
| | DCA RULE 9N-3 FOR: |
| | A) GLASS BLOCK AS SHOWN ON PLANS. |
| | B) PRECAST LINTELS AS SHOWN ON PLANS. |
| | C) ALL SEMCO (SEE DETAIL 10/D-1) AND ALL SIMPSON |
| | STRUCTURAL CONNECTORS AS SHOWN ON |
| | PLANS/DETAILS/SPECIFICATIONS. |
| | D) STORM SHUTTERS IF DOORS/WINDOWS DON'T HAVE IMPACT |
| | GLASS. AND, PROVIDE COMPLETE INSTALLATION SCHEDULE. |
| | E) ROOF TILE AS SHOWN ON PLANS. |
| | F) ROOF TILE ADHESIVE AS SHOWN ON PLANS. SEE CONCRETE |
| | TILE PRODUCT APPROVAL FOR LISTED ADHESIVES. |
| | G) ALL WINDOWS AS SHOWN ON PLANS. SINGLE HUNG, FIXED, |
| | ROUND AND ARCHED WINDOWS. |
| | H) ALL DOORS AS SHOWN ON PLANS. ENTRY DOOR WITH |
| | SIDELITE, ETC. AND, CLEARLY IDENTIFY WHICH PRODUCT |
| | APPROVAL IS FOR EACH DOOR. EX: ENTRY DOOR, CABANA BATH |
| | DOOR, MASTER BEDROOM EXTERIOR SWING DOOR, ETC. |
| | I) WINDOW MULLIONS AS SHOWN ON PLANS. AND, CLEARLY |
| | SPECIFY MULLION SIZE TO VERIFY COMPLIANCE WITH THE |
| | CALCULATED DESIGN PRESSURES. |
| | J) DECORATIVE COLONIAL SHUTTERS AS SHOWN ON EXTERIOR |
| | ELEVATION. |
| | K) GARAGE DOORS FOR SIZES SHOWN ON PLANS. |
| | |
| | *** RESPONSE TO SUBMITTAL: REPEAT COMMENT. NOT |
| | ADDRESSED. |
| | |
| | 5- ENGINEER OF RECORD TO REVIEW AND APPROVE IN WRITING |
| | (NOT SIGNING AND SEALING) ALL OF THE ABOVE PRODUCT |
| | APPROVALS. SEC. 107.3.4.1 CITY AMENDMENTS TO FBC. |
| | |
| | *** RESPONSE TO SUBMITTAL: REPAT COMMENT. NOT |
| | ADDRESSED. |
| | |
| | 6- PROVIDE COMPLETE MANUFACTURER SPECS FOR APPLIANCES |
| | DESIGNED TO BE USED IN THE OUTDOOR SUMMER KITCHEN. SEC. |
| | 107.2.1 CITY AMENDMENTS TO FBC. |
| | |
| | ***RESPONSE TO SUBMITTAL: REPEAT COMMENT. NOT |
| | ADDRESSED. |
| | |
| | 7- STRUCTURAL DOOR BUCK DETAIL 4/D-1. PROVIDE |
| | CALCULATIONS SHOWING HOW THE STRUCTURAL 2X4 BUCK |
| | FASTENED WITH 3/16" TAPCONS SPACED AT 36" O.C. WILL |
| | MEET THE DESIGN PRESSURES REQUIRED BY ITEM #3 ABOVE. |
| | SEC. 107.2.1.3 CITY AMENDMENTS TO FBC. (NOTE: CLARIFY |
| | WHY FASTENERS SPECIFIED FOR WINDOW BUCKS SEEMS TO BE |
| | STRONGER THAN THE ONES SPECIFIED FOR THE DOORS). ALSO, |
| | CHECK SIZE OF BUCK WITH SIZE REQUIRED BY THE DOOR |
| | PRODUCT APPROVAL. REMEMBER THAT BUCK MUST PROVIDE FULL |
| | SUPPORT TO THE DOOR FRAME. 2X4 BUCK MAY NOT BE WIDE |
| | ENOUGH. |
| | |
| | ***RESPONSE TO SUBMITTAL: REPEAT COMMENT. NOT |
| | ADDRESSED. |
| | |
| | 8- SHEET S-2: REVISE ROOF FRAMING NOTE REGARDING THE |
| | MINIMUM LIVE LOAD FOR THE BOTTOM CHORD OF THE TRUSS. |
| | SEE FOOTNOTES B AND G OF TABLE R301.5 OF 2010 |
| | FBC-RESIDENTIAL AND REVISE AS REQUIRED. |
| | |
| | *** RESPONSE TO SUBMITTAL: REPEAT COMMENT. NOT |
| | ADDRESSED. |
| | |
| | 9- TRUSS PACKAGE SUBMITTED. |
| | A) REVISE DESIGN CRITERIA TO EXPOSURE "C" AS REQUIRED |
| | BY SEC. R301.2.1.4.3 OF 2010 FBC-RESIDENTIAL. |
| | |
| | B) REVISE DESIGN LOADS TO MATCH DESIGN LOADS SPECIFIED |
| | BY THE ENGINEER OF RECORD ON SHEET S-2. SEC. 107.2.1 |
| | CITY AMENDMENTS TO FBC. |
| | |
| | C) THERE IS AN ENGINEER OF RECORD FOR THIS BUILDING. |
| | COVER SHEETS SAYS N/A. REVISE COVER SHEET AS REQUIRED. |
| | SEC. 107.3.4.1 CITY AMENDMENTS. |
| | |
| | *** RESPONSE TO SUBMITTAL: REPEAT COMMENT. NOT |
| | ADDRESSED. |
| | |
| | 10- ENGINEER OF RECORD TO REVIEW AND APPROVE TRUSS |
| | PACKAGE PRIOR TO SUBMITTAL TO THIS OFFICE. SEC. |
| | 107.3.4.1 CITY AMENDMENTS. |
| | |
| | ***RESPONSE TO SUBMITTAL: REPEAT COMMENT. NOT |
| | ADDRESSED. |
| | |
| | |
| | ***NOTE: |
| | MISSING ONE SET OF PLANS. ONE SET OF PLANS TAKEN OUT ON |
| | 1/8/13 BUT WERE NOT RETURNED YET. |
| | |
| | |
| | IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS, PLEASE CALL |
| | JULIO GOMEZ |
| | COMMERCIAL COMBINATION PLANS EXAMINER |
| | (561)805-6712 |
| | |
| | |
