| Date |
Text |
| 2013-02-15 11:19:39 | RESIDENTIAL (R3) ADDITION SECOND BUILDING REVIEW |
| | CHECKLIST. |
| | CODE: 2010 FBC. |
| | |
| | 1- SHEET 2 OF 4: |
| | A) ORIGINAL COMMENT: |
| | "OPENINGS ON EXISTING MASTER BEDROOM WERE CLOSED. |
| | PROVIDE SPECIFICATIONS/DETAILS SHOWING HOW COMPLYING |
| | WITH THE EGRESS REQUIREMENTS OF SEC. R310.". |
| | |
| | ***RESPONSE: |
| | REVISED PLANS SHOW AN EGRESS WINDOW FROM THE MASTER |
| | BATHROOM. THIS DOESN'T COMPLY. THE EGRESS WINDOW SHALL |
| | BE IN THE MASTER BEDROOM, NOT IN THE MASTER BATHROOM. |
| | REVISE AS REQUIRED TO COMPLY. |
| | |
| | B) ORIGINAL COMMENT: |
| | "NOTE #2 SPECIFIES EXTERIOR WALLS TO BE 2X4 STUDS WITH |
| | R-19 INSULATION. R-19 BATT INSULATION DOESN'T FIT ON |
| | 2X4 WALL. REVISE AS REQUIRED. SEC. 107.2.1 CITY |
| | AMENDMENTS TO FBC." AND, COORDINATE WITH ITEM #6(B) |
| | BELOW. |
| | |
| | ***RESPONSE: |
| | NOT ADDRESSED. |
| | |
| | 2- SHEET 3 OF 4: DESIGN PRESSURES SHOWN FOR THE NEW |
| | WINDOWS DON'T CORRESPOND TO EXPOSURE "D". PROVIDE |
| | ACTUAL CALCULATIONS SHOWING HOW THE DESIGN PRESSURES |
| | WERE CALCULATED. SEC. 107.2.1.3 CITY AMENDMENTS TO FBC. |
| | |
| | 3- SHEET 4 OF 4: |
| | A) ORIGINAL COMMENT: |
| | REVISE NAILING SCHEDULE TYPE OF NAIL AND NAIL SPACING. |
| | ROOF SHEATHING REQUIRES MIN. 8D RING SHANK NAILS. AND |
| | THE SPACING REQUIRED FOR ZONE #3 IS 4"O.C. AND 6"O.C. |
| | FOR ZONES 1 AND 2. SEC. R803.2.3.1 OF 2010 |
| | FBC-RESIDENTIAL. |
| | |
| | ***RESPONSE: |
| | NAILING SCHEDULE ON SHEET 4 OF 4 WAS NOT REVISED. |
| | REVISE TO MATCH INFORMATION SHOWN ON THE TRUSS LAYOUT. |
| | CLEARLY IDENTIFY THE ROOF ZONES ON THE TRUSS LAYOUT |
| | (DRAWING SUBMITTED IS MISMATCHING ROOF ZONE 2 AND 3. |
| | REVISE AS REQUIRED). |
| | |
| | 4- SOIL TEST REPORT SUBMITTED STATES THAT A SOIL |
| | BEARING CAPACITY OF 2500 POUNDS PER SQUARE FOOT MAY BE |
| | UTILIZED IN THE FOOTING DESIGN "WHEN THE FOOTINGS BEAR |
| | ONE AND ONE HALF (1.5) TO TWO (2) FEET BELOW THE |
| | FINISHED GRADE". (SEE SECOND TO LAST PARAGRAPH ON SHEET |
| | 3 OF SOIL TEST REPORT). REVISE DRAWINGS AS REQUIRED TO |
| | SHOW THIS RECOMMENDATIONS. SEC. 107.2.1 CITY |
| | AMENDMENTS. |
| | |
| | 5- REVISED ENERGY CALCULATIONS SUBMITTED: |
| | A) REVISE ITEMS 6A, 6B AND 6C. NEED TO PROVIDE MINIMUM |
| | REQUIREMENTS FROM TABLE 402A OF SECOND SHEET OF THE |
| | ENERGY CALCULATIONS SUBMITTED. AND, COORDINATE |
| | INFORMATION WITH INFORMATION SHOWN ON TABLE 402A. |
| | |
| | 6- ACCORDING TO TRUSS PACKAGE SUBMITTED, THE DESIGNER |
| | OF RECORD NEED TO REVISE THE FOLLOWING INFORMATION ON |
| | THE PLANS (SEC. 107.2.1 CITY AMENDMENTS): |
| | A) THE CONNECTOR (SIMPSON H16-2) DOESN'T MEET THE |
| | UPLIFT LOADS CALCULATED BY THE TRUSS ENGINEER. REVISE |
| | AS REQUIRED. |
| | |
| | B) TRUSSES NEED BEARING AT THE ENDS TO BE 6" (SEE TRUSS |
| | A1 AND A2G. THEY SHOW RIGID SURFACE W=6"). PLANS SHOW |
| | 2X4 WOOD STUDS. REVISE AS REQUIRED. |
| | |
| | C) SPECIFY THE CONNECTORS FOR EXISTING ROOF TRUSSES TO |
| | BE RESTING ON NEW GIRDER TRUSS A2G. TRUSS LAYOUT |
| | SPECIFIES CONNECTIONS BY OTHERS. |
| | |
| | 7- PROVIDE PRODUCT APPROVAL (2 COPIES) AS REQUIRED BY |
| | DCA RULE 9N-3 FOR: |
| | A) ALL SIMPSON STRUCTURAL CONNECTORS SPECIFIED ON PLANS |
| | AND DETAILS. INCLUDING THE H16-2 CONNECTOR SPECIFIED AT |
| | THE ENDS OF GIRDER TRUSS. ***NOTE: NEED TO COORDINATE |
| | THIS CONNECTOR WITH ITEM #6 (A) ABOVE. PROVIDE ONLY THE |
| | PRODUCT APPROVAL COVER PAGE AND PAGE SHOWING THE |
| | SPECIFIED CONNECTOR. |
| | |
| | IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS, PLEASE CALL |
| | JULIO GOMEZ |
| | COMMERCIAL COMBINATION PLANS EXAMINER |
| | (561)805-6712 |
