| Date |
Text |
| 2013-01-14 15:51:59 | FAILED |
| | |
| | 1) THE PROPOSED SIGNS DO NOT COMPLY WITH THE CURRENT |
| | CITYPLACE MASTER SIGN PLAN. CITYPLACE HAS REQUESTED AN |
| | AMENDMENT TO THE MASTER SIGN PLAN, BUT THIS PROPOSAL |
| | WILL NOT HAVE THE ADOPTION HEARINGS UNTIL JANUARY 22, |
| | 2013. THE REVIEW COMMENTS BELOW ARE BASED ON THE |
| | AMENDMENT BEING APPROVED ON 2ND READING. |
| | |
| | 2) A NOTARIZED LETTER IS REQUIRED FROM CITYPLACE |
| | PERMITTING THE VERTICAL BUILDING SIGNS. |
| | |
| | 3) THE PERMIT DRAWN LIST THE SQUARE FOOTAGE FOR THE |
| | SIGNS AS 64.30 SQ. FT. PER SIGN FACE FOR A TOTAL OF |
| | 128.6 SQ. FT OF SIGNAGE. THE SOUTH ROSEMARY (WEST) |
| | FACADE STOREFRONT LENGTH IS ONLY 104 LINEAR FEET. THE |
| | SIGN MAY ONLY CONTAIN 104 SQ. FT. PLEASE NOTE THAT |
| | CITYPLACE MAY PROVIDE AN ADMINISTRATIVE VARIANCE VIA A |
| | NOTARIZED LETTER APPROVING AN INCREASE IN THE AVAILABLE |
| | SIGN SQUARE FOOTAGE BY 25% (26 SQUARE FEET). IT SHOULD |
| | BE NOTED THAT THE SIGN SIZE SEEMS TO HAVE BEEN |
| | CALCULATED ON THE BOX AROUND THE FURTHEST PROJECTIONS |
| | OF THE SIGN AND NOT THE ACTUAL SIGN SILHOUETTE AS |
| | PERMITTED BY THE CITYPLACE MASTER SIGN PLAN FOR |
| | VERTICAL BUILDING SIGNS. |
| | |
| | 4) THE CITYPLACE MASTER SIGN PLAN REQUIRES THAT AS PART |
| | OF THE BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATION FOR VERTICAL |
| | BUILDING SIGNS, THE APPLICANT SHALL PROVIDE THE SIGN |
| | AREA CALCULATIONS FOR ALL EXISTING SIGNAGE FOR THE |
| | TENANT USE / STOREFRONT, TOGETHER WITH THE PROPOSED |
| | SIGN FACE AREA, SIGN DIMENSIONS, AND LOCATION OF THE |
| | PROPOSED VERTICAL BUILDING SIGN. THE PHOTOS SUPPLIED |
| | WITH THE PERMIT APPLICATION SHOW SIGNAGE HANGING FROM |
| | THE VALENCES OF THE BB KING AWNINGS. THIS SIGNAGE IS |
| | NOT PERMITTED BY CODE AND HAS BEEN INSTALLED WITHOUT A |
| | PERMIT. PERMITTED SIGNAGE ON THE VALANCE OF AN AWNING |
| | COUNTS TOWARD THE PERMITTED FACADE SIGNAGE AND THUS |
| | WOULD REDUCE THE SQUARE FOOTAGE FOR THE VERTICAL |
| | BUILDING SIGNS. THIS IS ESPECIALLY PROBLEMATIC ON THE |
| | SOUTH ROSEMARY AVENUE FACADE (SEE COMMENT 2 ABOVE). |
| | VERIFICATION THAT THE ILLEGAL SIGNS HAVE BEEN REMOVED |
| | IS REQUIRED PRIOR TO ZONING APPROVING THIS PERMIT. |
| | |
| | 5) VERTICAL BUILDING SIGNS MAY NOT HAVE VISIBLE EXPOSED |
| | BULBS. THE PROPOSED SIGN HAS EXPOSED BULBS. |
| | |
| | 6) THE MAXIMUM DISTANCE A VERTICAL BUILDING SIGN MAY BE |
| | EXTENDED BY SUPPORT ARMS OR BRACKETS FROM THE WALL FACE |
| | THAT IT IS ATTACHED TO MAY NOT EXCEED TWO (2) FEET. THE |
| | SUPPORT ARMS EXTEND MORE THAN TWO (2) FEET. |
| | |
| | 7) NO INFORMATION IS PROVIDED ON THE HEIGHT OF THE |
| | SIGNS FROM GRADE. |
| | |
| | 8) THE SIGNS ARE PROJECTING OVER RIGHTS-OF-WAY. PROVIDE |
| | VERIFICATION THAT EITHER 1) THE SIGN PROJECTIONS OVER |
| | SOUTH ROSEMARY AVENUE AND HIBISCUS STREET MEET THE |
| | FLORIDA BUILDING CODE PROJECTION OVER A RIGHT-OF-WAY |
| | ALLOWANCES; OR 2) PROVIDE A COPY OF AN EASEMENT |
| | AGREEMENT WITH THE CITY ALLOWING THE RIGHT-OF-WAY |
| | PROJECTIONS. |
| | |
| | A COPY OF THESE COMMENTS HAS BEEN PROVIDED TO CARLOS |
| | BERNAL OF CITYPLACE. |
| | |
| | CONTACT ERIC SCHNEIDER @ (561) 822-1446. |
| | |
| 2013-01-07 16:48:04 | GAVE TO E.S. - MD |
