| Plan Review Notes For Permit 12100729 |
| Permit Number |
12100729 |
|
| Review Stop |
B |
| Sequence Number |
1 |
|
| Notes |
| Date |
Text |
| 2012-11-07 16:46:14 | 2010 FBC | | | | | | DENIED BY BUILDING | | | | | | 1) THE PLANS THAT WERE SUBMITTED ARE REQUIRED TO BE | | | SIGNED AND SEALED BY THE ARCHITECT SPECIFIED IN THE | | | TITLE BLOCK PER FS 481. | | | | | | 2) THE PLANS HAVE BEEN REDUCED IN SIZE FROM THE | | | ORIGINAL 1/4" SCALE AND ARE TOO SMALL. CITY AMENDMENT | | | 107.2.1.4 REQUIRES PLANS TO BE A MINIMUM SCALE OF 1/8" | | | SCALE. PLEASE CORRECT. | | | | | | 3) THERE ARE NO DIMENSIONS ON THE PLANS. PROVIDE | | | DIMENSIONED FLOOR PLANS. CITY AMENDMENT 107.2.1 | | | | | | 4) ON SHEET SP-1 THE WRONG CODE EDITION AND DESIGN | | | CRITERIA IS SPECIFIED FOR THE PROJECT INFORMATION. THE | | | WINDOW AND DOOR PRESSURES LISTED ARE TOO LOW FOR | | | EXPOSURE C WITH A 25' MRH. THE PRESSURES FOR A 10 SQFT | | | OPENING IN WALL ZONE 5 WOULD BE +42.3, -56.6 PSF PER | | | FBCR 301.2.1. | | | | | | 5) TWO PRODUCT APPROVALS WERE SUBMITTED FOR TRACO | | | SINGLE HUNG WINDOWS. THERE IS NO MENTION OF WINDOW | | | REPLACEMENT ON THE APPLICATION OR IN THE SCOPE OF WORK | | | ON THE PLANS. PLEASE CLARIFY. NOTE: THESE PRODUCT | | | APPROVALS EXPIRED IN 2007. | | | | | | ROBERT MCDOUGAL | | | BLDG. PLAN REVIEW | | | (561)805-6714 | | | [email protected] |
|
