| Date |
Text |
| 2013-03-07 16:45:04 | FAILED |
| | |
| | PLEASE RESPOND TO COMMENTS IN WRITING. |
| | |
| | 1) THE FORMAL SITE PLAN APPROVAL ISSUED FOR THE OUTLET |
| | BUILDINGS INCLUDED A CONDITION THAT, "THERE SHALL BE NO |
| | DOORS ON THE SOUTHERN FACADES OF THE OUTLET CENTER |
| | BUILDINGS (BUILDINGS J-7 AND J-8) OPPOSITE THE OPENINGS |
| | TO THE SERVICE BAYS." BLDGS J-7 AND J-8 HAVE DOORWAYS |
| | ACROSS FROM THE SERVICE BAY OPENING, WHICH IS NOT |
| | PERMITTED. |
| | |
| | 2) THE FOLLOWING HAVE BEEN IDENTIFIED AS DISCREPANCIES |
| | BETWEEN THE APPROVED FORMAL SITE PLAN AND THE PROPOSED |
| | BUILDING PERMIT PLANS. WHILE STAFF RECOGNIZES THAT SOME |
| | CHANGES ARE INEVITABLE BETWEEN SITE PLAN APPROVAL AND |
| | BUILDING PERMIT PLANS, STAFF DOES NOT SUPPORT ALL OF |
| | THE PROPOSED CHANGES. |
| | |
| | A. THE EXTERIOR PARAPET HEIGHTS ON THE PROPOSED PLANS |
| | DO NOT MATCH THE EXTERIOR PARAPET HEIGHTS ON THE |
| | APPROVED FORMAL SITE PLAN. VARIOUS BUILDINGS HAVE |
| | LOWER, HIGHER OR BOTH CONDITIONS. IT IS NOT CONSISTENT |
| | TO ONE TYPE OF PARAPET, BUT RATHER THE HEIGHT |
| | DIFFERENCES APPLY TO EACH TYPE OF PARAPET. STAFF IS |
| | CONCERNED THAT THE LOWER PARAPETS NO LONGER PROVIDE |
| | ACCURATE SCREENING OF THE ROOFTOP MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT. |
| | SEE COMMENT #3 BELOW. |
| | |
| | B. NONE OF THE SIDEWALKS IN FRONT OF SERVICE COURTS ARE |
| | SHOWN AS A PAVERED MATERIAL AS REQUIRED BY THE APPROVED |
| | SITE PLANS. |
| | |
| | C. THE SERVICE COURT SCREEN WALLS ARE TWO (2) INCHES |
| | SHORTER THAN APPROVED. |
| | |
| | D. SOME OF THE PROPOSED SERVICE BAY OPENINGS ARE |
| | GREATER THAN THE APPROVED OPENING WIDTH, WHICH RESULTS |
| | IN THE REQUIRED SERVICE AREA LANDSCAPE NOT EXTENDING |
| | FIVE (5) FEET PAST THE END OF THE WALL OPENING. |
| | |
| | E. THE BICYCLE RACKS SHOWN BY THE WPB POLICE OFFICE ARE |
| | SHOWN IN A DIFFERENT LOCATION. IF IT THE BICYCLE RACKS |
| | ARE TO BE LOCATED TO THE WEST OF THE OFFICE, THEN THE |
| | WALKWAY DIMENSION, MEETING ADA WIDTH MINIMUM, SHALL BE |
| | SHOWN FROM THE END OF A PARKED BICYCLE (IE NOT THE |
| | RACK). |
| | |
| | F. THE VALET PICK-UP AREA IS DIFFERENT. |
| | |
| | G. PARKING LOT AREAS ARE DIFFERENT. |
| | |
| | H. A CHILDREN'S PLAY AREA HAS BEEN ADDED TO THE PLAN, |
| | WHICH REMOVES A MEDJOOL PALM TREE. WHERE IS THIS TREE |
| | BEING INSTALLED? A CODE COMPLIANT REVISED LANDSCAPE |
| | PLAN SHALL BE SUBMITTED TO THE BUILDING DIVISION. |
| | |
| | I. NEW AND RELOCATED DOORWAYS AND WALKWAYS HAVE ARE |
| | INCLUDED WITH BLDG J-3, J-5, J-6 AND J-8. THESE CHANGES |
| | IMPACT THE APPROVED FOUNDATION LANDSCAPE FOR THE OUTLET |
| | BUILDINGS AND SINCE LANDSCAPE IS BEING REMOVED, THE |
| | OVERALL SITE LANDSCAPE PERCENTAGE, WHICH WAS BARELY IN |
| | EXCESS OF THE REQUIRED 15% MINIMUM, MAY AFFECT THE |
| | REMAINDER OF THE SITE'S DEVELOPMENT. A CODE COMPLIANT |
| | REVISED LANDSCAPE PLAN SHALL BE SUBMITTED TO THE |
| | BUILDING DIVISION. |
| | |
| | J. FACADE ELEMENTS HAVE CHANGED ON SOME OF THE |
| | BUILDINGS. |
| | |
| | 3) THE SECTION DRAWINGS SHOW SOME OF THE ROOF TOP |
| | MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT EXTENDING OVER THE HEIGHT OF THE |
| | PARAPET WALLS. PLEASE PROVIDE VERIFICATION THAT ALL THE |
| | ROOFTOP MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT WILL BE SCREENED. |
| | |
| | 4) WHY IS THE BUS PARKING BAY BY BLDG J-2 BEING SHOW AS |
| | EXTENDING INTO THE PEDESTRIAN CROSS WALK? |
| | |
| | 5) PLEASE EXPLAIN THE "SMART CART" AND HOW THIS AREA |
| | WILL LOOK & FUNCTION. |
| | |
| | 6) THE PLANTER AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF BLDG. J-5 |
| | APPEARS TO BE BRICKED OVER ON THE SITE PLAN. |
| | |
| | 7) THERE ARE NEW DOORS IN THE SERVICE BAY WALLS. |
| | PROVIDE THE DETAILS ON SERVICE COURT METAL DOORS. |
| | |
| | 8) PLEASE DESCRIBE THE KNOCKOUT PANELS SHOWN ON BLDG |
| | J-5. |
| | |
| | 9) SEPARATE PERMITS ARE REQUIRED FOR: |
| | A. SIGNAGE |
| | B. AWNINGS |
| | C. PARKING LOT STRIPING |
| | D. SHADE STRUCTURES |
| | |
| | CONTACT ERIC SCHNEIDER @ (561) 822-1446. |
