| Date |
Text |
| 2012-12-18 15:59:58 | NEW RESIDENCE (R3) SECOND BUILDING REVIEW CHECKLIST. |
| | CODE: 2010 FBC. |
| | |
| | 1- AFTER PLANS ARE REVISED, BRING THEM TO PALM BEACH |
| | COUNTY BUILDING (2300 N. JOG RD.) TO VERIFY IF IMPACT |
| | FEES ARE DUE. BRING BACK STAMPED PLANS AND COPY OF PAID |
| | RECEIPT IF FEES ARE DUE. REQ'D BY COUNTY IMPACT FEE |
| | ORDINANCE OF THE UNIFIED LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE. (REPEAT |
| | COMMENT. NOT ADDRESSED). |
| | |
| | 2- PROVIDE DRAINAGE PLAN AS REQ'D BY SEC. R401.3 F 2010 |
| | FBC-RESIDENTIAL. (REPEAT COMMENT. NOT ADDRESSED). |
| | |
| | 3- CLEARLY SPECIFY EGRESS BEDROOM WINDOWS. SEC. R310 OF |
| | 2010 FBC-RESIDENTIAL. SPECIFY ALL WINDOW TYPES & SIZES. |
| | (REPEAT COMMENT. NOT ADDRESSED). |
| | |
| | 4. AT LEAST ONE BATHROOM SHALL PROVIDE DOOR WITH MIN. |
| | 29" CLEAR OPENING. SEC. R320.1.1 OF 2010 |
| | FBC-RESIDENTIAL. (REPEAT COMMENT. NOT ADDRESSED). |
| | |
| | 5- SPECIFY SAFETY GLASS ON BATHROOMS. SEC. R308.4(5) OF |
| | 2010 FBC-RESIDENTIAL. (REPEAT COMMENT. NOT ADDRESSED). |
| | |
| | 6- PROVIDE PRODUCT APPROVAL (2 COPIES) AS REQUIRED BY |
| | DCA RULE 9N-3 FOR: |
| | A) HORIZONTAL SLIDING WINDOWS AS SHOWN ON PLANS. |
| | (REPEAT COMMENT. NOT ADDRESSED). |
| | |
| | B) ALL SIMPSON STRUCTURAL CONNECTORS SPECIFIED ON |
| | PLANS. PROVIDE ONLY THE PRODUCT APPROVAL COVER PAGE AND |
| | PAGE SHOWING THE CONNECTOR. THIS APPLIES TO STRUCTURAL |
| | CONNECTORS ONLY. (REPEAT COMMENT. NOT ADDRESSED). |
| | |
| | C) GARAGE EXTERIOR SWING DOOR & REAR SWING DOOR AS |
| | SHOWN ON PLANS. NEED CURRENT PRODUCT APPROVAL AND |
| | PROVIDE 2 COPIES. PRODUCT INFORMATION SUBMITTED IS NOT |
| | CURRENT. (REPEAT COMMENT. NOT ADDRESSED). |
| | |
| | D) FIXED WINDOWS AS SHOWN ON PLANS. (REPEAT COMMENT. |
| | NOT ADDRESSED). |
| | |
| | E) PEEL & STICK SHINGLES UNDERLAYMENT AS SPECIFIED ON |
| | PROPOSED KEY NOTE PN-20 ON SHEET A-1. NOTE; |
| | UNDERLAYMENT TO BE DESIGNED TO BE USED WITH SHINGLES. |
| | (REPEAT COMMENT. NOT ADDRESSED). |
| | |
| | 7- ENGINEER OF RECORD TO REVIEW AND APPROVE IN WRITING |
| | (NOT SIGNING AND SEALING) ALL PRODUCT APPROVALS AS |
| | REQUIRED BY SEC. 107.3.4.1 CITY AMENDMENTS TO FBC. |
| | (REPEAT COMMENT. NOT ADDRESSED). |
| | |
| | 8- SOIL TEST REPORT FROM NUTTING ENGINEERS DATED MAY |
| | 2012 IDENTIFIES MUCK ON THE SOIL. ENGINEER (RICK |
| | WOHLFARTH) SUGGESTED OWNER (O.C. MOORE) DEEPER TEST |
| | BORING TO PROVIDE DEEP FOUNDATION RECOMMENDATIONS. MR. |
| | MOORE TOLD THE ENGINEER THAT HE WILL PERFORM A |
| | DEMUCKING OPERATION RATHER THAN PURSUING A DEEP |
| | FOUNDATION SYSTEM. ENGINEER ALSO TOLD TO THE OWNER THAT |
| | GIVEN THE CONDITIONS OF THE SITE THE DEEP FOUNDATION |
| | SYSTEM WAS RECOMMENDED RATHER THAN DEMUCKING. |
| | ***NOTE: OWNER NEEDS TO GET A PERMIT FOR DEMUCKING. |
| | NEED TO PROVIDE COMPLETE ENGINEERING REPORT FOR THE |
| | DEMUCKING PROCESS. SEC. 107.2.1.3 CITY AMENDMENTS TO |
| | FBC. DENSITY TEST DONE BY TESTING LAB OF THE PALM |
| | BEACHES, INC. DATED 6/13/12 WAS DONE TO A DEPTH OF |
| | 3'-0" ONLY. THERE IS NO INDICATION OF WHAT WAS DONE TO |
| | THE MUCK. OWNER STILL NEEDS TO ADDRESS THE MUCK ISSUE |
| | PER SOIL TEST REPORT RECOMMENDATIONS. (REPEAT COMMENT. |
| | NOT ADDRESSED). |
| | |
| | 9- ENGINEER OF RECORD TO REVIEW SOIL TEST REPORT. THE |
| | REPORT IDENTIFIES MUCK ON THE SOIL AND SPECIFIES THAT |
| | IF THE SITE IS PROPERLY PREPARED, THEN THE FOUNDATION |
| | SYSTEM SHOULD BE DESIGNED FOR AN ALLOWABLE SOIL BEARING |
| | PRESSURE OF 2,000 POUNDS PER SQUARE FOOT. THE REPORT |
| | ALSO RECOMMENDS A MINIMUM FOOTING WITH OF 16 INCHES. |
| | ENGINEER OF RECORD SPECIFIES 2500 SOIL BEARING CAPACITY |
| | AND THE WIDTH OF THE FOOTING IS 14 INCHES. ENGINEER OF |
| | RECORD TO ADDRESS THIS ISSUES BY REVISING PLANS |
| | ACCORDING TO RECOMMENDATIONS OR BY PROVIDING |
| | ENGINEERING ANALYSIS SHOWING WHY IS NOT REQUIRED TO |
| | FOLLOW REPORT RECOMMENDATIONS. SEC. 107.2.1.3 CITY |
| | AMENDMENTS TO FBC. (REPEAT COMMENT. NOT ADDRESSED). |
| | |
| | 10- PROVIDE HURRICANE SHUTTERS COMPLETE INSTALLATION |
| | SCHEDULE TO VERIFY COMPLIANCE WITH THE PRODUCT APPROVAL |
| | LIMITATIONS AND DESIGN PRESSURES REQUIRED BY SEC. |
| | R301.2.1.4.3 OF 2010 FBC-RESIDENTIAL. (REPEAT COMMENT. |
| | NOT ADDRESSED). |
| | |
| | 11- SPECIFY ATTIC ACCESS SIZE. SEC. R807 OF 2010 |
| | FBC-RESIDENTIAL. (REPEAT COMMENT. NOT ADDRESSED). |
| | |
| | 12- REVISE PROPOSED KEYNOTE #PN-31 ON SHEET A-1. GARAGE |
| | DOOR NOA 09-0604.05 WAS SUPERSEDED BY MIAMI-DADE AND |
| | WAS NOT THE NOA SUBMITTED BY THE CONTRACTOR. . SEE NOA |
| | SUBMITTED AND REVISE ACCORDINGLY. CURRENT NOA REQUIRED |
| | BY DCA RULE 9N-3. (REPEAT COMMENT. NOT ADDRESSED). |
| | |
| | 13- SHEET A-2: |
| | A) DOORS AND WINDOWS DESIGN PRESSURES SHOWN ON THE |
| | EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS DON'T MATCH THE DESIGN PRESSURES |
| | SHOWN ON THE WIND LOAD SCHEDULE. SEC. R301.2.1.4.3 OF |
| | 2010 FBC-RESIDENTIAL. (REPEAT COMMENT. NOT ADDRESSED). |
| | |
| | B) CORNER DISTANCE "A" SHOWN ON THE WIND LOAD SCHEDULE |
| | IS 4'-0" MIN. NOT 3'-0". SEE FOOTNOTE ON FIGURE |
| | R301.2(7) OF 2010 FBC-RESIDENTIAL AND REVISE AS |
| | REQUIRED. (REPEAT COMMENT. NOT ADDRESSED). |
| | |
| | C) REVISE PLYWOOD SHEATHING NAILING SCHEDULE. SEC. |
| | R803.2.3.1 OF 2010 FBC-RESIDENTIAL REQUIRES 8D RING |
| | SHANK NAILS AT 4"O.C. NOT 6"O.C. IN ROOF ZONE 3. |
| | (REPEAT COMMENT. NOT ADDRESSED). |
| | |
| | 14- SPECIFY SPECIFY CARBON MONOXIDE ALARM FOR SLEEPING |
| | ROOMS. SEC. R315 OF 2010 FBC-RESIDENTIAL. AND, |
| | REVISE/CLARIFY GENERAL ELECTRIC NOTE #12 ON SHEET A-5. |
| | NOT CLEAR IF ONLY INSTALLING CARBON MONOXIDE ALARMS IN |
| | GARAGE. (REPEAT COMMENT. NOT ADDRESSED). |
| | |
| | 15- ROOF FRAMING PLAN: ENGINEER TO SPECIFY ALL THE LIVE |
| | AND DEAD LOADS AS REQUIRED BY SEC. R301.1 ALSO, INCLUDE |
| | THE ATTIC LIVE LOAD REQUIRED BY TABLE R301.5 OF 2010 |
| | FBC-RESIDENTIAL. (REPEAT COMMENT. NOT ADDRESSED). |
| | |
| | IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS, PLEASE CALL |
| | JULIO GOMEZ |
| | COMMERCIAL COMBINATION PLANS EXAMINER |
| | (561)805-6712 |
