| Date |
Text |
| 2013-02-12 16:03:08 | ****CORRECTIONS**** |
| | |
| | SAMANTHA HILL, BUILDING PLANS EXAMINER |
| | 561-805-6724 [email protected] |
| | FBC FLORIDA BUILDING CODE 2010 |
| | FBC R FLORIDA BUILDING CODE 2010 RESIDENTIAL |
| | |
| | COMMENTS FROM PREVIOUS LIST: |
| | |
| | 1. REGARDING THE INFORMATION SUBMITTED FOR SHUTTERS,, |
| | SUBSTRATE IS STATED AS CONCRETE BLOCK, CANNOT USE WALL |
| | MOUNT 1 ON A BLOCK SUBSTRATE. PROPOSED EDGE DISTANCE IS |
| | 1", SEE SHEET 16, A DISTANCE LESS THAN 3" REQUIRES A |
| | .50 FACTOR BUT 1" IS NOT ALLOWED (1.5" ONLY FOR |
| | CRETE-FLEX). |
| | |
| | 5TH REVIEW: |
| | |
| | 1" EDGE DISTANCE PROPOSED. SEE SHEET 5, CANNOT HAVE A |
| | 1" EDGE DISTANCE. |
| | |
| | FOR A 1 1/2" EDGE DISTANCE (WHICH IS MARKED ON THE |
| | PRODUCT APPROVAL), A .35 FACTOR IS REQUIRED. SEE CHART |
| | WHERE CONTRACTOR HAS MARKED ARROWS, THERE IS AN "NA" |
| | FOR MASONRY FOR CONNECTION TYPE 3 (TOP). THIS MEANS |
| | THAT CONCRETE SUBSTRATE IS REQUIRED FOR A 3(TOP) |
| | CONNECTION. SEE OPENING 1. |
| | |
| | THE FACTOR OF .35 IS TO BE APPLIED TO ANCHOR SPACING IF |
| | THE EDGE DISTANCE IS 1 1/2" (1" NOT ALLOWED AS THIS |
| | WILL CAUSE THE CONCRETE TO FAIL). SO, IF THE ANCHOR |
| | SPACING IN THE CHART IS 12", THE .35 FACTOR WOULD |
| | RESULT IN SPACING OF 4.2", WHICH DOES NOT MEET THE |
| | MINIMUM (6") FOR THIS FASTENER, SEE CHART ON SHEET 7. |
| | THIS MEANS THAT ANCHOR SPACING CANNOT BE CLOSER THAN |
| | SPECIFIED IN THE CHART PER MANUFACTURER AND PRODUCT |
| | APPROVAL ENGINEER. |
| | |
| | SPANS NOT CLEAR. THIS SHOULD BE THE DISTANCE FROM |
| | ANCHOR TO ANCHOR. SEE OPENING 1, OPENING SIZE IS GIVEN |
| | AS 6' X 4'8", VERTICAL INSTALLATION, WITH A SPAN OF |
| | 6'2. THIS IS THE SPAN FOR A HORIZONTAL INSTALLATION. |
| | |
| | |
| | 2. PLANS WERE REMOVED BY TWO DIFFERENT INDIVIDUALS |
| | (DWIGHT AND AMI). THE PRODUCT APPROVALS, REVIEWED AND |
| | STAMPED BY HISTORIC, WHICH ARE REQUIRED FOR ISSUANCE |
| | WERE NOT RETURNED. PLEASE SUBMIT. |
| | |
| | 5TH REVIEW, A DIFFERENT PRODUCT APPROVAL WAS SUBMITTED. |
| | THE FLORIDA STATE PRODUCT APPROVAL COVER SHEET WAS NOT |
| | PROVIDED, PLEASE PROVIDE, WWW.FLORIDABUILDING.ORG, |
| | FAC9N-3. AS THE PRODUCT APPROVALS PREVIOUSLY STAMPED BY |
| | HISTORIC WERE NOT PROVIDED, THE LATEST APPROVALS WILL |
| | BE ROUTED TO HISTORIC FOR REVIEW. |
| | |
| | 3. OK - FYI, NO DELAYS CAUSED BY INCORRECT NAME. THIS |
| | INFORMATION WAS ADVISORY ONLY TO PREVENT FUTURE |
| | MISFILINGS AND DELAYS. |
| | |
| | NEW COMMENT: |
| | |
| | 4. PLEASE HAVE QUALIFIER READ ALL COMMENTS AND REVIEW |
| | REVISED DOCUMENTS PRIOR TO RESUBMITTAL. |
| | |
| | |
