| Date |
Text |
| 2012-11-14 15:02:06 | FAILED |
| | |
| | PLEASE PROVIDE RESPONSES IN WRITING. |
| | |
| | 1) REPEAT COMMENT - THE CITYPLACE DESIGN GUIDELINES |
| | INCLUDE A SECTION ON THE ARCHITECTURAL CHARACTER FOR |
| | CITYPLACE. THIS INCLUDES THAT THE MATERIALS WILL BE |
| | DERIVED FROM THE MEDITERRANEAN VOCABULARY. PRIMARY |
| | BUILDING MATERIALS WILL BE LIGHT COLORED STUCCO, STONE |
| | OR PRECAST. WOOD, TILE AND STONE WILL BE USED IN WINDOW |
| | AND OTHER FACADE DETAILS. THE INTERIOR ARCADE ELEVATION |
| | SHOWS THE MAJORITY OF THE FACADE TREATED WITH "MFG. |
| | GENERAL SHALE BRICK STYLE, ENGLISH PUB" BRICKS. STAFF |
| | HAS LOOKED AT THE BRICK STYLE ON THE MANUFACTURER'S |
| | SITE, AND THEY DO NOT COMPLY WITH THE MEDITERRANEAN |
| | CHARACTER REQUIREMENT. PLEASE NOTE THAT A COMMENT ABOUT |
| | BRICKS NOT MEETING THE MEDITERRANEAN CHARACTER WAS MADE |
| | IN AN E-MAIL TO GINA MOORE ON MARCH 23, 2012. |
| | |
| | 2) REPEAT COMMENT - THE CITYPLACE DESIGN GUIDELINES |
| | ENCOURAGE VARIATION IN THE ROSEMARY RETAIL CORRIDOR |
| | STREET FACADE. AS SUCH, PLEASE CONSIDER VARYING THE |
| | MATERIALS AT VARIOUS POINTS ALONG THE 300+ FOOT LONG |
| | FACADE. CITYPLACE HAS PROVIDED AN E-MAIL WITH A |
| | CONCEPTUAL ELEVATION TO STAFF WHICH SHOWS STUCCO ON |
| | PIERS ALONG THE FACADE. THE ZONING STAFF IS AMENIABLE |
| | TO THE CONCEPT OF STUCCO PIERS TO VARY THE FACADE, BUT |
| | HAS NOT SEEN THE FINAL VERSION OF WHAT CITYPLACE WILL |
| | APPROVE. |
| | |
| | 3) THE NEW POSTER CASES PROPOSED ON THE ROSEMARY AVENUE |
| | FRONTAGE ARE NOT PERMITTED, AS THEY ARE NOT DESIGNATED |
| | LOCATIONS IN THE CITYPLACE MASTER SIGN PLAN. |
| | |
| | 4) PLEASE REMEMBER THAT THE RS THAT ARE USED AS DOOR |
| | HANDLES SHALL COUNT TOWARD THE SIGNAGE SQUARE FOOTAGE |
| | ON THE BUILDING. |
| | |
| | CONTACT ERIC SCHNEIDER @ (561) 822-1446. |
| | |