| Date |
Text |
| 2012-11-05 11:34:34 | 2010 FBC |
| | |
| | DENIED BY BUILDING |
| | |
| | 1) CITY AMENDMENTS 107.2.1 REQUIRES ALL INFORMATION, |
| | DRAWINGS, SPECIFICATIONS AND ACCOMPANYING DATA TO BEAR |
| | THE NAME AND SIGNATURE OF THE PERSON RESPONSIBLE FOR |
| | THE DESIGN. PLEASE CORRECT. |
| | |
| | 2) SPECIFY THE WIND-SPEED DATA AND EXPOSURE CATEGORY ON |
| | THE PLANS. FBCR 301.2.1 AND 301.2.1.4.3 |
| | |
| | 3) SPECIFY THE COMPONENT AND CLADDING PRESSURE FOR THE |
| | WALL AREAS ON THE PLANS. FBCR 301.2.1 |
| | |
| | 4) PROVIDE STRUCTURAL DETAILS FOR THE WINDOW AND DOOR |
| | INFILL FRAMING ON THE PLANS. CITY AMENDMENTS 107.2.1 |
| | |
| | 5) SPECIFY THE OPENING PRESSURES FOR THE WINDOWS ON THE |
| | PLANS. FBCR 301.2.1 |
| | |
| | 6) SUBMIT TWO COPIES OF PRODUCT APPROVALS FOR THE NEW |
| | WINDOWS AS REQUIRED BY DCA RULE 9N-3. |
| | |
| | 7) SHOW COMPLIANCE WITH FBCR FOR WIND-BORNE DEBRIS |
| | PROTECTION OF THE NEW WINDOWS AS REQUIRED BY |
| | FBCR301.2.1.2. |
| | |
| | 8) IF STORM PANELS ARE USED, TWO SETS OF PRODUCT |
| | APPROVALS, KEY PLANS AND INSTALLATION SCHEDULES WILL BE |
| | REQUIRED. DCA RULE 9N-3 AND CITY AMENDMENT 107.2.1.3 |
| | |
| | 9) PRODUCT APPROVALS ARE REQUIRED TO BE REVIEWED AND |
| | APPROVED IN WRITING BY THE DESIGNER OF RECORD FOR THE |
| | PROJECT PER CITY AMENDMENT 107.3.4.1 |
| | |
| | 10) THE SMOKE ALARMS ON THE OUTSIDE OF THE SLEEPING |
| | ROOMS ARE REQUIRED TO BE LOCATED IN THE IMMEDIATE |
| | VICINITY OF THE BEDROOMS PER FBCR 314.3. THE SMOKE |
| | ALARM IN THE KITCHEN DOES NOT MEET THIS REQUIREMENT. |
| | |
| | 11) THE KITCHEN IS TYPICALLY NOT AN ACCEPTABLE LOCATION |
| | DUE TO THE PROXIMITY TO COOKING VAPORS. THE |
| | MANUFACTURER'S SPECIFICATIONS NORMALLY REQUIRE SMOKE |
| | ALARMS TO BE LOCATED A MINIMUM DISTANCE FROM THE |
| | COOKING APPLIANCES. REFER TO THE SMOKE ALARMS LISTING |
| | INFORMATION. FBCR 314.1 |
| | |
| | 12) SHOW COMPLIANCE WITH FBCR 315.1 WHICH REQUIRES |
| | CARBON MONOXIDE ALARMS WITHIN 10 FEET OF EACH ROOM USED |
| | FOR SLEEPING PURPOSES. |
| | |
| | 13) THE VALUE OF $8500.00 STATED ON THE APPLICATION |
| | APPEARS TO BE LOW FOR THE SCOPE OF WORK INDICATED BY |
| | THE PLANS. FOR PERMITTING PURPOSES, VALUATION OF |
| | BUILDINGS AND SYSTEMS SHALL BE THE TOTAL REPLACEMENT |
| | VALUE TO INCLUDE STRUCTURAL, ELECTRICAL, PLUMBING, |
| | MECHANICAL, INTERIOR FINISHES, DESIGN FEES, OVERHEAD |
| | AND PROFIT. CITY AMENDMENTS 109.3 |
| | |
| | 14) IN ORDER TO EXPEDITE PLAN REVIEW TIME WHEN |
| | RESUBMITTING, PLEASE SUBMIT A RESPONSE LETTER |
| | INDICATING HOW THE REVIEW COMMENTS HAVE BEEN ADDRESSED. |
| | |
| | 15) THERE IS AN OPEN OWNER BUILDER PERMIT APPLICATION |
| | FOR WORK AT ANOTHER ADDRESS LOCATION BY THIS OWNER. THE |
| | OWNER BUILDER EXEMPTION MAY NOT APPLY AND A CONTRACTOR |
| | MAY BE REQUIRED IF THE OWNER PLANS TO RENT OR SELL THIS |
| | PROPERTY WITHIN A YEAR OF COMPLETION OF THE WORK. FS |
| | 489.103 |
| | |
| | ROBERT MCDOUGAL |
| | BLDG. PLAN REVIEW |
| | (561)805-6714 |
| | [email protected] |
