| Date |
Text |
| 2012-09-19 10:02:55 | PLANNING AND ZONING: **** FAILED **** |
| | |
| | |
| | 1. RESPOND TO COMMENTS IN WRITING. |
| | |
| | 2. PURSUANT TO THE ZONING CODE, SECTION 94-211(D)(6), |
| | STORIES ABOVE THE FIRST FLOOR SHALL HAVE CLEAR GLAZED |
| | AREA AND OPENINGS BETWEEN 25 PERCENT AND 45 PERCENT OF |
| | THE FACADE AREA. PROVIDE DIMENSIONS SHOWING COMPLIANCE |
| | ACCORDINGLY. |
| | |
| | 3. PURSUANT TO THE ZONING CODE, SECTION 94-211(D)(8) |
| | WINDOWS SHALL BE RECESSED A MINIMUM OF TWO INCHES FROM |
| | THE EXTERIOR FACE OF THE FACADE. SHOW DETAIL OR |
| | DIMENSIONS. |
| | |
| | 4. SHEET A-5 : PURSUANT TO THE ZONING CODE, SECTION |
| | 94-211(D)(10) OPENINGS IN UPPER STORIES SHALL BE |
| | CENTERED DIRECTLY ABOVE OPENINGS IN THE FIRST STORY. |
| | THE PROPOSED OPENINGS DO NOT COMPLY. THIS REGULATION IS |
| | APPLICABLE TO ALL FACADES OF THE BUILDING. |
| | |
| | 5. PURSUANT TO THE ZONING CODE, SECTION 94-211(D)(13), |
| | ALL WINDOWS, EXCEPT STOREFRONT WINDOWS, SHALL BE |
| | OPERABLE. WINDOW C ON SHEET C-5 IS NOT OPERABLE. REVISE |
| | ALL WINDOWS ACCORDINGLY. |
| | |
| | 6. SIGNAGE WILL BE REVIEWED UNDER SEPARATE PERMIT AND |
| | SHALL COMPLY WITH THE ZONING CODE, SECTION 94-211(E). |
| | THE PROPOSED SIGN HAS TO BE PART OF THE FACADE OR BE |
| | INCORPORATED AS PART OF THE BUILDING. ADDITIONALLY, |
| | COMPLY WITH SUBSECTION (7) AND (8) SO ALL FASTENERS ARE |
| | CONCEALED. |
| | |
| | ALSO, PLEASE REVISE PLANS TO A UNIVERSAL SCALE SUCH AS |
| | THE ARCHITECTURAL SCALE OR AN ENGINEERING SCALE. |
| | |
| | 7. SEPARATE LANDSCAPE AND IRRIGATION PERMITS ARE |
| | REQUIRED. TWO (2) COPIES OF THE LANDSCAPE PLAN AND A |
| | CERTIFIED COST ESTIMATE THAT INCLUDES THE TOTAL COST OF |
| | ALL LANDSCAPE MATERIALS AND LABOR, BROKEN DOWN INTO |
| | UNIT COST SHALL BE SUBMITTED WITH THE LANDSCAPE PERMIT |
| | APPLICATION. |
| | |
| | PLEASE HAVE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT CONTACT ME TO DISCUSS |
| | PROPOSED LANDSCAPE PLAN. |
| | |
| | NOTE: THE PROPOSED MAHOGANY TREE ALONG THE TERMINAL |
| | ISLANDS MAY NOT BE APPROPRIATE FOR THE LOCATION BY THE |
| | ALLEY AND WITHIN CLOSE PROXIMITY OF THE SILK TREE. |
| | CONSIDER USING A SMALLER TREE SUCH AS THE CRAPE MYRTLE |
| | TREE 16'HEIGHT, O.A., 6' SPREAD OR PINK/YELLOW TAB OR |
| | SIMILAR TREE SPECIES. ALSO CONSIDER REVERSING THE |
| | LOCATION OF THE MONTGOMERY PALMS WITH THE FLOSS SILK |
| | TREE TO GIVE THE FLOSS SILK TREE MORE AREA TO GROW. IT |
| | IS CURRENTLY PROPOSED TOO CLOSE TO THE FENCE AT |
| | +/2'-6". |
| | |
| | ALSO, PLEASE REVISE PLANS TO A UNIVERSAL SCALE SUCH AS |
| | THE ARCHITECTURAL SCALE OR AN ENGINEERING SCALE. |
| | |
| | IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS, PLEASE CONTACT ME. |
| | |
| | LINDA MIA FRANCO, AICP |
| | SENIOR PLANNER |
| | PLANNING DIVISION |
| | TEL: 9561) 822-1443 |
| | EMAIL: [email protected] |
| | |
| | |
| | |
