| Date |
Text |
| 2012-08-10 15:34:23 | BUILDING PLAN REVIEW |
| | PERMIT: 12070993 |
| | ADD: 939 25TH CT |
| | CONT: RICKEY J WILSON CONSTRUCTION, INC |
| | TEL: (561)722-6015 |
| | |
| | 2010 FLORIDA BUILDING CODE W |
| | * WEST PALM BEACH ADMINISTRATIVE AMENDMENTS |
| | |
| | 2010 EXISTING BUILDING CODE LEVEL II 701.3 |
| | COMPLIANCE. ALL NEW CONSTRUCTION ELEMENTS, COMPONENTS, |
| | SYSTEMS, AND SPACES SHALL COMPLY WITH THE REQUIREMENTS |
| | OF THE FLORIDA BUILDING CODE, BUILDING. |
| | |
| | 1ST REVIEW |
| | ACTION: DENIED |
| | |
| | 1) PLEASE REVIEW ADDRESSINGS COMMENTS IT APPEARS THAT |
| | THE PLANS HAVE THE WRONG ADDRESS AND WILL NEED TO BE |
| | CORRECTED. |
| | |
| | 2) THE PERMIT APPLICATION UNDER THE HEADING DESCRIPTION |
| | OF WORK INDICATES: |
| | A) REPAIR DAMAGED FRONT OF BUILDING AND REPLACE ROTTEN |
| | WOOD |
| | B) BUILD A ADA COMPLIANT BATHROOMINSIDE UNIT |
| | |
| | 2A) REPAIR DAMAGE TO FRONT OF BUILDING. |
| | PLEASE PROVIDE A COST BREAK DOWN TO WHAT PORTION OF THE |
| | FUNDS ARE TO BE USED FOR THE REPAIR OF THE DAMAGED |
| | FRONT AND WHAT WILL GO TOWARDS TTHE NEW ADA BATHROOM. |
| | AT THIS TIME IT CAN NOT BE DETERMINED IF THE REPAIRS |
| | ARE TO BE CONSIDERED UNDER SECTION 2010 EXISTING |
| | BUILDING CODE 506.2.1. |
| | |
| | 506.2.1 FOR DAMAGE LESS THAN SUBSTANTIAL STRUCTURAL |
| | DAMAGE, THE DAMAGED ELEMENTS SHALL BE PERMITTED TO BE |
| | RESTORED TO THEIR PREDAMAGE CONDITION. |
| | |
| | 506.2.2 REPAIRS FOR SUBSTANTIAL STRUCTURAL DAMAGE TO |
| | ELEMENTS OF THE LATERAL-FORCE-RESISTING SYSTEM. |
| | A BUILDING THAT HAS SUSTAINED SUBSTANTIAL STRUCTURAL |
| | DAMAGE TO THE ELEMENTS OF ITS LATERAL FORCE-RESISTING |
| | SYSTEM SHALL BE EVALUATED IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION |
| | 506.2.2.1, AND EITHER REPAIRED IN ACCORDANCE WITH |
| | SECTION 506.2.2.2 OR REPAIRED AND REHABILITATED IN |
| | ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION 506.2.2.3 DEPENDING ON THE |
| | RESULTS OF THE EVALUATION. |
| | |
| | 506.2.2.1 EVALUATION. THE BUILDING SHALL BE EVALUATED |
| | BY A REGISTERED DESIGN PROFESSIONAL, AND THE EVALUATION |
| | FINDINGS SHALL BE SUBMITTED TO THE CODE OFFICIAL. THE |
| | EVALUATION SHALL ESTABLISH WHETHER THE DAMAGED |
| | BUILDING, IF REPAIRED TO ITS PREDAMAGED STATE, WOULD |
| | COMPLY WITH THE PROVISIONS OF THE CODES THAT WERE IN |
| | EFFECT WHEN THE BUILDING WAS PERMITTED. |
| | |
| | 506.2.2.2 EXTENT OF REPAIR FOR COMPLIANT BUILDINGS. IF |
| | THE EVALUATION ESTABLISHES THAT THE BUILDING IN ITS |
| | PREDAMAGE CONDITION COMPLIES WITH THE PROVISIONS OF |
| | SECTION 506.2.2.1, THEN THE DAMAGED ELEMENTS SHALL BE |
| | PERMITTED TO BE RESTORED TO THEIR PREDAMAGE CONDITION. |
| | |
| | 506.2.2.3 EXTENT OF REPAIR FOR NONCOMPLIANT BUILDINGS. |
| | IF THE EVALUATION DOES NOT ESTABLISH THAT THE BUILDING |
| | IN ITS PREDAMAGE CONDITION COMPLIES WITH THE PROVISIONS |
| | OF SECTION 506.2.2.1, THEN THE BUILDING SHALL BE |
| | REHABILITATED TO COMPLY WITH THE PROVISIONS OF THIS |
| | SECTION. THE WIND LOAD FOR THE REPAIR AND |
| | REHABILITATION SHALL BE THOSE REQUIRED BY THE BUILDING |
| | CODE IN EFFECT AT THE TIME OF ORIGINAL CONSTRUCTION, |
| | UNLESS THE DAMAGE WAS CAUSED BY WIND, IN WHICH CASE THE |
| | WIND LOADS SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE FLORIDA |
| | BUILDING CODE, BUILDING. |
| | |
| | SUBSTANTIAL DAMAGE. DAMAGE OF ANY ORIGIN SUSTAINED BY A |
| | STRUCTURE WHEREBY THE COST OF RESTORING THE STRUCTURE |
| | TO ITS BEFORE-DAMAGED CONDITION WOULD EQUAL OR EXCEED |
| | 50 PERCENT OF THE MARKET VALUE OF THE STRUCTURE BEFORE |
| | THE DAMAGE OCCURRED. [B] |
| | |
| | SUBSTANTIAL STRUCTURAL DAMAGE. A CONDITION WHERE: |
| | 1. IN ANY STORY, THE ELEMENTS OF THE LATERAL |
| | FORCE-RESISTING SYSTEM HAVE SUFFERED DAMAGE SUCH THAT |
| | THE LATERAL LOAD-CARRYING CAPACITY OF THE STRUCTURE IN |
| | ANY HORIZONTAL DIRECTION HAS BEEN REDUCED BY MORE THAN |
| | 20 PERCENT FROM ITS PRE-DAMAGED CONDITION; OR |
| | 2. THE CAPACITY OF ANY VERTICAL LOAD-CARRYING |
| | COMPONENT, OR ANY GROUP OF SUCH COMPONENTS, THAT |
| | SUPPORTS MORE THAN 30 PERCENT OF THE TOTAL AREA OF THE |
| | STRUCTURE?S FLOOR(S) AND ROOF(S) HAS BEEN REDUCED MORE |
| | THAN 20 PERCENT FROM ITS PREDAMAGED CONDITION AND THE |
| | REMAINING CAPACITY OF SUCH AFFECTED ELEMENTS, WITH |
| | RESPECT TO ALL DEAD AND LIVE LOADS, IS LESS THAN 75 |
| | PERCENT OF THAT REQUIRED BY THE FLORIDA BUILDING CODE, |
| | BUILDING FOR NEW BUILDINGS OF SIMILAR STRUCTURE, |
| | PURPOSE AND LOCATION. |
| | |
| | 2B) AGAIN IN TRYING TO DETERMINE THE FUNDS THAT ARE |
| | GOING TO THE ACCESSIBLE RESTROOM PLEASE SEE SECTION |
| | 2010 EXISTING BUILDING CODE LEVEL II 701.3 COMPLIANCE. |
| | ALL NEW CONSTRUCTION ELEMENTS, COMPONENTS, SYSTEMS, AND |
| | SPACES SHALL COMPLY WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE |
| | FLORIDA BUILDING CODE, BUILDING VERSES DISPROPORTIONATE |
| | COST. |
| | |
| | 2010 FLORIDA ACCESSIBILITY CODE 202.4.2 ACCESSIBLE |
| | FEATURES IN THE EVENT OF DISPROPORTIONALITY. |
| | WHEN THE COST OF ALTERATIONS NECESSARY TO MAKE THE PATH |
| | OF TRAVEL TO THE ALTERED AREA FULLY ACCESSIBLE IS |
| | DISPROPORTIONATE TO THE COST OF THE OVERALL ALTERATION, |
| | THE PATH OF TRAVEL SHALL BE MADE ACCESSIBLE TO THE |
| | EXTENT THAT IT CAN BE MADE ACCESSIBLE WITHOUT INCURRING |
| | DISPROPORTIONATE COSTS. IN CHOOSING WHICH ACCESSIBLE |
| | ELEMENTS TO PROVIDE, PRIORITY SHOULD BE GIVEN TO THOSE |
| | ELEMENTS THAT WILL PROVIDE THE GREATEST ACCESS, IN THE |
| | FOLLOWING ORDER: (I) AN ACCESSIBLE ENTRANCE; (II) AN |
| | ACCESSIBLE ROUTE TO THE ALTERED AREA; (III) AT LEAST |
| | ONE ACCESSIBLE RESTROOM FOR EACH SEX OR A SINGLE UNISEX |
| | RESTROOM; (IV) ACCESSIBLE TELEPHONES; (V) ACCESSIBLE |
| | DRINKING FOUNTAINS; AND (VI) WHEN POSSIBLE, ADDITIONAL |
| | ACCESSIBLE ELEMENTS SUCH AS PARKING, STORAGE, AND |
| | ALARMS. |
| | |
| | PLEASE SEE FIGURE 604.8.1.6 ACCESSIBILITY CODE. |
| | |
| | 3) PLANS FAIL TO PROVIDE BACKING AND GRAB BARS FOR THE |
| | WATER CLOSET AND TUB. SEE 604.5 GRAB BARS FOR TUB AND |
| | 607.2 TUB CLEARANCE AND SECTION 607.4 FOR TUB GRAB |
| | BARS. |
| | |
| | 4) 2010 FBC-B 1203.4.2.1. BATHROOM VENTILATION REQUIED. |
| | |
| | A THOROUGH REVIEW CAN NOT BE MADE AT THIS TIME, AS A |
| | RESULT OF THE ADDITIONAL INFORMATION REQUESTED |
| | ADDITIONAL COMMENTS MAY APPEAR THAT WERE NOT PART OF |
| | THIS REVIEW. |
| | JAMES A. WITMER CBO |
| | SENIOR COMMERCIAL COMBINATION PLANS EXAMINER |
| | TEL: 561-805-6715 |
| | FAX: 561-805-6676 |
| | E-MAIL: [email protected] |
| | CONSTRUCTION SERVICES HOME PAGE |
| | HTTP://WWW.CITYOFWPB.COM/CONSTRUCTION/INDEX.PHP |
| | |
| | PLEASE NOTE: FLORIDA HAS A VERY BROAD PUBLIC RECORDS |
| | LAW. WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS TO OR FROM LOCAL OFFICIALS |
| | REGARDING CITY BUSINESS ARE PUBLIC RECORD, AVAILABLE TO |
| | THE PUBLIC UPON REQUEST. YOUR E-MAIL COMMUNICATIONS ARE |
| | THEREFORE SUBJECT TO PUBLIC DISCLOSURE. |
| | |
| | MEMBER OF BOAF: BUILDING OFFICIALS ASSOCIATION OF |
| | FLORIDA SAVING LIVES AND PROPERTY SINCE 1953 |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
