| Date |
Text |
| 2012-08-07 10:57:29 | 2010 FBC |
| | |
| | DENIED BY BUILDING |
| | |
| | 1) THE STRUCTURE IS LOCATED WITHIN 600 FT OF THE |
| | INTERCOASTAL WATERWAY. ACCORDING TO FBC R301.2.1.4.3, |
| | THIS STRUCTURE IS LOCATED IN EXPOSURE CATEGORY D. |
| | PLEASE REVISE THE PRESSURES, UPLIFTS AND OTHER WIND |
| | LOADS ON THE PLANS. |
| | |
| | 2) THE ENERGY CALCULATIONS THAT WERE SUBMITTED ARE ON |
| | THE OLD 2007 FBC FORM. THE 2010 FBC ENERGY CONSERVATION |
| | REQUIRES FORM 405. PLEASE SUBMIT 2 SETS OF ENERGY |
| | CALCULATIONS ON THE PROPER FORMS AS REQUIRED BY FBC |
| | ENERGY CONSERVATION SECTION 405.4.2. |
| | |
| | 3) THERE WERE SEVERAL ERRORS ON THE ENERGY CALCULATIONS |
| | THAT WERE SUBMITTED AS FOLLOWS: 1) THE ADDITION IS ON A |
| | SLAB FOUNDATION, NOT A CRAWL SPACE. (2) THE CEILING FAN |
| | CREDIT IS NO LONGER ALLOWED. (3) THE CALCS. SHOW A |
| | VENTED ATTIC AND SHEET S-2 OF THE PLANS SHOWS AN |
| | UN-VENTED ATTIC WITH R-30 ICYNENE SPRAY FOAM |
| | INSULATION. (3) THE RESIDENCE IS LOCATED IN WEST PALM |
| | BEACH AND THE CALCS. HAVE FORT LAUDERDALE. PLEASE |
| | REVIEW THE ENERGY CALCULATIONS TO INSURE THAT THE |
| | INFORMATION GIVEN IS CORRECT. 2010 FBC ENERGY |
| | CONSERVATION CHAPTER 4. |
| | |
| | 4) SUBMIT A SIGNED AND SEALED COPY OF THE SOIL REPORT |
| | AS REQUIRED BY FS 471.025. |
| | |
| | 5) THE PRODUCT APPROVALS THAT WERE SUBMITTED FOR THE |
| | SECTIONAL GARAGE DOORS IS EXPIRED. SUBMIT CURRENT |
| | PRODUCT APPROVALS FOR THE GARAGE DOORS. DCA RULE 9N-3. |
| | |
| | 6) ROOF NOTE 1 ON SHEET S-6 THAT SPECIFIES THE WIND |
| | SPEED AS 140MPH 3 SECOND GUST AND EXPOSURE B IS |
| | INCORRECT. UNDER THE 2010 FBCR THE WINDSPEED FOR WEST |
| | PALM BEACH IS 170 MPH VULT AND THE EXPOSURE CATEGORY |
| | FOR THIS STRUCTURE IS D. PLEASE CORRECT. FBC R301.2.1 & |
| | R301.2.1.4 |
| | |
| | 7) THE COMPONENT AND CLADDING PRESSURES FROM THE FRENCH |
| | DOOR AND CASEMENT WINDOW PRODUCT APPROVALS ARE LESS |
| | THAN THE REQUIRED PRESSURES SPECIFIED IN THE TABLE ON |
| | A-2 FOR MARK C. PLEASE PROVIDE PRODUCT APPROVALS WITH |
| | ADEQUATE DESIGN PRESSURES AS REQUIRED BY FBC R301.2.1. |
| | ALSO PLEASE HAVE THE STRUCTURAL ENGINEER REVIEW THE |
| | COMPONENT AND CLADDING PRESSURES IN THE TABLES ON A-2, |
| | THEY APPEAR TO BE THE VULT VALUES RATHER THAN THE VASD |
| | VALUES. |
| | |
| | 8) ON THE TAMKO PRODUCT APPROVALS FOR THE FLAT ROOF, |
| | PLEASE SPECIFY THE APPROVED ASSEMBLY AND FASTENING |
| | OPTION THAT WILL BE USED. ALSO, PROVIDE TWO COPIES OF |
| | THE ENHANCED FASTENING REQUIREMENTS FOR THE PERIMETER |
| | AND CORNER AREAS IN ACCORDANCE WITH LIMITATION NUMBER 7 |
| | ON PAGE 15 OF THE PRODUCT APPROVAL. |
| | |
| | 9) PLEASE SPECIFY THE ATTACHMENT METHOD LISTED IN THE |
| | PRODUCT APPROVAL THAT WILL BE USED TO INSTALL THE CLAY |
| | BARREL AND PROVIDE ADEQUATE RESISTANCE TO OVERTURNING |
| | MOMENT PER FBC R905.3. IF POLYFOAM WILL BE USED PLEASE |
| | SUBMIT TWO COPIES OF THE PRODUCT APPROVALS AS REQUIRED |
| | BY DCA RULE 9N-3. |
| | |
| | ROBERT MCDOUGAL |
| | BLDG. PLAN REVIEW |
| | (561)805-6714 |
| | [email protected] |
