| Date |
Text |
| 2013-01-07 09:10:13 | RESIDENTIAL (R3) CHANGE OF USE FIFTH BUILDING REVIEW |
| | CHECKLIST. |
| | CODE: 2010 FBC. |
| | |
| | 1- E-MAIL SUBMITTED SHOWS NOA 11-0107.10. THIS NOA IS |
| | FOR WINDOW MULLIONS. THERE ARE NOT WINDOW MULLIONS ON |
| | THIS PROJECT. NEED TO PROVIDE PRODUCT APPROVALS FOR |
| | CASEMENT WINDOWS AND FOR SINGLE HUNG WINDOWS AS SHOWN |
| | ON PLANS. SEE COPY OF PREVIOUS CHECKLIST BELOW: |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | 1- PROVIDE PRODUCT APPROVAL (2 COPIES) AS REQUIRED BY |
| | SEC. 107.2 CITY AMENDMENTS TO FBC AND RULE 9N-3 FOR: |
| | A) CASEMENT WINDOW AS SHOWN ON PLANS. CLARIFY IF |
| | DRAWINGS SUBMITTED ARE ALREADY APPROVED BY DCA OR BY |
| | MIAMI-DADE. PROVIDE PRODUCT APPROVAL NUMBER OR NOA |
| | NUMBER. OTHERWISE COMPLETE PRODUCT APPROVAL INFORMATION |
| | CAN BE SUBMITTED BY THE ENGINEER TO OBTAIN A ONE TIME |
| | LOCAL PRODUCT APPROVAL. |
| | |
| | B) SINGLE HUNG WINDOW AS SHOWN ON PLANS. SAME COMMENT |
| | AS FOR CASEMENT WINDOW ABOVE. |
| | |
| | 2- ARCHITECT TO REVIEW AND APPROVE IN WRITING ABOVE |
| | PRODUCT APPROVALS. SEC. 107.3.4.1 CITY AMENDMENTS. |
| | |
| | 3- FOUR TIMES FOR THE PORTION OF PLAN REVIEW FEE WAS |
| | CHARGED TO THE ARCHITECT AS REQUIRED BY FLORIDA STATUTE |
| | 553.80(2)(B) AND AS MENTIONED ON THE PREVIOUS THIRD |
| | REVIEW CHECKLIST. TOTAL FEE IS $332.52 (83.13 X 4 = |
| | 332.52). |
| | |
| | ***NOTE: |
| | SUBMIT SEPARATE PERMIT APPLICATIONS FOR ELECTRICAL AND |
| | FOR MECHANICAL WORK. ONLY PERMIT APPLICATIONS FOR THE |
| | BUILDING AND PLUMBING WORK WERE SUBMITTED. |
| | |
| | IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS, PLEASE CALL |
| | JULIO GOMEZ |
| | COMMERCIAL COMBINATION PLANS EXAMINER |
| | (561)805-6712 |
