| Date |
Text |
| 2012-07-25 13:29:18 | 2010 FBC |
| | |
| | DENIED BY BUILDING |
| | |
| | 1) CORRECTED. |
| | |
| | 2) CORRECTED. |
| | |
| | 3) CORRECTED. HOWEVER, THE DOOR SCHEDULE LISTS TWO |
| | STATE PRODUCT APPROVAL NUMBERS FOR THE AMARR GARAGE |
| | DOOR. THE PRODUCT APPROVAL PRESSURES (-52.1, +45.9 PSF) |
| | LISTED IN THE SCHEDULE ARE FOR FL #7170-R3. ACCORDING |
| | TO THE PRODUCT EVALUATION, FL #6243 HAS PRESSURES OF |
| | (-41.0, +37.0 PSF) WHICH ARE LESS THAN THE REQUIRED |
| | OPENING PRESSURES SPECIFIED IN THE DOOR SCHEDULE. |
| | PLEASE CORRECT. CITY AMENDMENTS 107.2.1 AND R301.2.1 |
| | |
| | 4) CORRECTED. |
| | |
| | 5) CORRECTED. |
| | |
| | 6) CORRECTED. |
| | |
| | 7) CORRECTED. |
| | |
| | 8) SUBMIT CURRENT PRODUCT APPROVALS FOR THE EXTERIOR |
| | DOORS, WINDOWS, ROOFING MATERIAL, LINTELS AND OTHER |
| | COMPONENTS AND CLADDING REQUIRED BY DCA RULE 9N-3. |
| | PRODUCT APPROVALS FOR THE ROOFING MATERIAL, LINTELS AND |
| | TRUSS ANCHORS HAVE NOT BEEN SUBMITTED. ALSO, PLEASE |
| | SUBMIT THE FL COVERSHEET AND EVALUATION REPORT FOR THE |
| | FIBERGLASS ENTRY DOOR. |
| | |
| | 9) SUBMIT MANUFACTURER'S SPECIFICATIONS AND/OR |
| | EVALUATIONS FOR THE SPRAY FOAM INSULATION, FIRE |
| | RETARDANT COATING AND HUBER ROOF SHEATHING. |
| | |
| | 10) CORRECTED. |
| | |
| | 11) THE WINDLOADS SPECIFIED IN THE TABLE ON SHEET S-3 |
| | NEEDS TO MATCH THE OPENING PRESSURES SPECIFIED IN THE |
| | WINDOW AND DOOR SCHEDULES ON THE ARCHITECTURAL |
| | DRAWINGS. CITY AMENDMENTS 107.2.1 AND FBC R301.2.1 THE |
| | SLIDING GLASS DOOR AND OVERHEAD GARAGE DOOR PRESSURES |
| | DO NOT MATCH. ALSO, IN THE DOOR SCHEDULE THE POSITIVE |
| | PRESSURE IS MORE THAN THE NEGATIVE PRESSURE FOR THE |
| | SLIDING GLASS DOOR. THE NEGATIVE PRESSURE IS ALWAYS |
| | HIGHER. PLEASE CORRECT. |
| | |
| | 12) THE FLOOR PLAN, ROOF PLAN AND ELEVATIONS THAT WERE |
| | SUBMITTED ARE ALL FOR A 6 UNIT BUILDING. IF YOU WISH TO |
| | USE THIS MASTER FOR BUILDINGS WITH OTHER THAN SIX UNITS |
| | YOU WILL NEED TO SUBMIT FLOOR PLANS, ROOF PLANS AND |
| | ELEVATIONS FOR EACH OF THE DIFFERENT CONFIGURATIONS. |
| | CITY AMENDMENTS 107.2.1 |
| | |
| | 13) NEW COMMENT. ON SHEET S-3 THE INTERIOR AND CORNER |
| | ZONE PRESSURES FOR THE ENTRY DOOR ARE THE SAME. THE |
| | CORNER ZONE PRESSURES SHOULD BE HIGHER. PLEASE CORRECT. |
| | FBC R301.2.1 |
| | |
| | ROBERT MCDOUGAL |
| | BLDG. PLAN REVIEW |
| | (561)805-6714 |
| | [email protected] |
