| Date |
Text |
| 2012-03-13 14:47:25 | ZONING PLAN REVIEW |
| | ___________________________________________ |
| | |
| | DATE OF REVIEW: 03.13.2012 |
| | PERMIT NO.: 12020414 |
| | ADDRESS: 4801 DREHER TRAIL NORTH |
| | CONTRACTOR/CONTACT: PETER GILSTAD |
| | TELEPHONE NO.: 561.655.2423 |
| | SCOPE OF REVIEW: ADDITION TO EXISTING SCIENCE MUSEUM. |
| | ___________________________________________ |
| | |
| | REVIEW STATUS: FAILED |
| | ___________________________________________ |
| | |
| | PLEASE PROVIDE A WRITTEN RESPONSE TO THE FOLLOWING PLAN |
| | REVIEW COMMENTS: |
| | |
| | 1. SHEET 2 OF 9 ? PAVING AND DRAINAGE PLAN AND SHEET |
| | LP-1 SHOW THE INSTALLATION OF A GENERATOR PAD IN THE |
| | SOUTHEAST CORNER OF THE EXISTING BUILDING. |
| | ADDITIONALLY, A GENERATOR IS SHOWN TO THE EAST OF THE |
| | PROPOSED ADDITION. PURSUANT TO SECTION 94-444(B) OF THE |
| | CITY'S ZONING AND LAND DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS (ZLDRS), |
| | GENERATORS SHALL BE COMPLETELY SCREENED FROM VIEW. |
| | SCREENING SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED OF BRICK, DECORATIVE |
| | CONCRETE, OTHER DECORATIVE MASONRY, OR COMPARABLY |
| | DURABLE WOOD AND STEEL. SHRUBS OR HEDGES SHALL BE |
| | PLANTED AROUND THE PERIMETER OF THE ENCLOSURE AT 2-FOOT |
| | INTERVALS. |
| | |
| | 2. PAVING OF DIRT ROAD TO ACCESS REAR PARKING LOT? |
| | |
| | 3. ACCORDING THE PLANS, THE DUMPSTER ENCLOSURES ARE |
| | BEING PLACED IMMEDIATELY WEST OF THE EXISTING STORAGE |
| | BUILDING, WITH LANDSCAPING BEHIND. WITH THE PROXIMITY |
| | OF THE ENCLOSURE TO THIS EXISTING BUILDING, WILL CREWS |
| | BE ABLE TO MAINTAIN THE SHURBS, ETC. BEHIND THE |
| | ENCLOSURE? |
| | |
| | 4. PURSUANT TO SECTION 94-444(B) OF THE CITY'S ZLDRS, |
| | THE ALL MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT IS TO BE SCREENED FROM |
| | VIEW. HVAC EQUIPMENT, ETC. IS SHOWN TO THE EAST OF THE |
| | PROPOSED ADDITION NEAR THE LOADING SPACE. SCREENING |
| | SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED OF BRICK, DECORATIVE CONCRETE, |
| | OTHER DECORATIVE MASONRY, OR COMPARABLY DURABLE WOOD |
| | AND STEEL. SHRUBS OR HEDGES SHALL BE PLANTED AROUND THE |
| | PERIMETER OF THE ENCLOSURE AT 2-FOOT INTERVALS. |
| | |
| | 5. PLEASE PROVIDE A DETAIL OF THE PROPOSED BIKE RACK. |
| | |
| | 6. PLEASE PROVIDE A DETAIL FOR ALL NEW FENCING THAT IS |
| | BEING PROPOSED (CHAIN LINK AND WOOD). THE PLANS AND/OR |
| | DETAIL SHALL CLEARLY INDICATE THE HEIGHTS OF ALL |
| | FENCES. |
| | |
| | 7. PLEASE PROVIDE A DETAIL OF THE DUMPSTER ENCLOSURE |
| | DETAIL AND VEGETATION PICK-UP. |
| | |
| | 8. THE PARKING DETAIL ON SHEET 3 OF 9 ? PAVING AND |
| | DRAINAGE DETAILS, SHALL CONFORM TO THE MINIMUM |
| | REQUIREMENTS OF THE CITY'S ZLDRS. |
| | |
| | 9. A CURRENT AND ACCURATE ALTA SURVEY SHALL BE |
| | PROVIDED. |
| | |
| | 10. A DETAILED AND ACCURATE SITE PLAN SHALL BE |
| | PROVIDED. SHEET A-101 DOES NOT PROVIDE ENOUGH |
| | INFORMATION TO DETERMINE COMPLIANCE WITH THE CITY'S |
| | ZLDRS. THE SITE PLAN SHALL CONTAIN THE FOLLOWING: |
| | A. VICINITY MAP SHOWING THE PROPERTY IN RELATION TO THE |
| | SURROUNDING AREA. |
| | B. LOCATION OF PROPOSED/EXISTING EASEMENTS. |
| | C. THE OUTLINES OF ALL BUILDINGS SHOWING THEIR PROPOSED |
| | USES, SETBACKS, DIMENSIONS, FLOOR AREA, NUMBER OF |
| | STORIES, HEIGHT AND POINTS OF ACCESS. |
| | D. LOCATION AND DIMENSIONS OF ALL PERIMETER TREATMENT |
| | (SIDEWALKS, FENCES, WALLS, OR BERMS). |
| | E. LOCATION, HEIGHT AND SIZE OF ALL FREESTANDING SIGNS |
| | AND OTHER ACCESSORY STRUCTURES. |
| | F. MEANS OF VEHICULAR AND PEDESTRIAN ACCESS TO AND FROM |
| | THE SITE. |
| | G. LAYOUT AND LOCATION OF ALL OFF-STREET PARKING, |
| | LOADING AND OTHER VEHICULAR USE AREAS, INCLUDING WHERE |
| | APPLICABLE, THE DISTANCE FROM THE PRINCIPLE USES. |
| | H. LOCATION OF ALL DISABLED SPACES, RAMPS AND SIGNS. |
| | I. LOCATION, HEIGHT AND INTENSITY OF ALL OUTDOOR |
| | ILLUMINATION. |
| | J. LOCATION OF EXISTING AND PROPOSED FIRE HYDRANTS (OR |
| | OPERATIONAL EQUIVALENTS) WITHIN 250 FEET OF THE |
| | PROPOSED STRUCTURE OR STRUCTURES. |
| | K. LOCATION AND SCREENING OF ALL GARBAGE RECEPTACLES. |
| | L. STANDARD CITY DETAILS OF PARKING (SMALL CAR, |
| | HANDICAP SPACE, STANDARD SPACE), HANDICAP RAMPS, |
| | DRIVEWAYS, DUMPSTERS AND SIGNS. |
| | M. SUPPLY A DATA TABLE WHICH INDICATES THE FOLLOWING: |
| | I. EXISTING/PROPOSED LAND USE AND ZONING. |
| | II. TOTAL ACRES OF THE PROJECT. |
| | III. TOTAL GROSS BUILDING SQUARE FOOTAGE. |
| | IV. PERCENT OF OPEN SPACE, LANDSCAPING, BUILDING |
| | COVERAGE & IMPERMEABLE SURFACE. |
| | V. ACRES AND PERCENT OF WATER BODIES. |
| | VI. DENSITY AND NUMBER OF DWELLING UNITS (RESIDENTIAL). |
| | VII. PARKING COMPUTATIONS (PARKING REQUIRED, PROVIDED, |
| | ETC.) |
| | VIII. FLOOR AREA RATIO (FAR). |
| | |
| | 11. PURSUANT TO SECTION 94-444, THE EXISTING A/C AREA, |
| | SOUTH OF THE EXISTING BUILDING, SHALL BE SCREENED. |
| | SCREENING SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED OF BRICK, DECORATIVE |
| | CONCRETE, OTHER DECORATIVE MASONRY, OR COMPARABLY |
| | DURABLE WOOD AND STEEL. SHRUBS OR HEDGES SHALL BE |
| | PLANTED AROUND THE PERIMETER OF THE ENCLOSURE AT 2-FOOT |
| | INTERVALS. |
| | |
| | 12. THE SITE PLAN ON SHEET A-101 DOES NOT MATCH THE |
| | CIVIL OR LANDSCAPE DRAWINGS WITH REGARD TO THE PROPOSE |
| | IMPROVEMENTS. SOME EXAMPLES INCLUDE, BUT ARE NOT |
| | LIMITED TO: |
| | A. CIVIL PLANS INDICATE THAT ONE OF THE OF THE EXISTING |
| | ALUMINUM BUILDING SOUTH OF THE EXISTING BUILDING IS |
| | BEING REMOVED; HOWEVER, THE SITE PLAN ON SHEET A-101 |
| | SHOWS ALL EXISTING BUILDINGS TO REMAIN. |
| | B. THE PARKING LOT CONFIGURATION, DUMPSTER LOCATIONS, |
| | SIDEWALK CONFIGURATIONS, ETC. SHOWN ON THE SHEET A-101 |
| | DOES NOT MATCH THAT SHOWN ON THE CIVIL AND LANDSCAPE |
| | PLANS. |
| | C. SHEET A-101 INDICATES THAT THE FLAGPOLE IS TO |
| | REMAIN, WHILE THE CIVIL PLAN INDICATE THAT IT IS BEING |
| | RELOCATED. |
| | D. SHEET A-101 SHOWS A NEW COVERED WOOD DECK SOUTH OF |
| | THE NEW ADDITION WITH RAMP, ETC. THIS IS NOT SHOWN ON |
| | ANY OTHER PLANS. |
| | E. THE FOOTPRINT OF THE BUILDING SHOWN ON SHEET A-101 |
| | DOES NOT MATCH THE OTHER PLANS. |
| | |
| | 13. THE LANDSCAPE PLAN DOES NOT MATCH THE CIVIL PLANS. |
| | SOME EXAMPLES INCLUDE, BUT ARE NOT LIMITED TO: |
| | A. CIVIL PLANS INDICATE THAT ONE OF THE OF THE EXISTING |
| | ALUMINUM BUILDING SOUTH OF THE EXISTING BUILDING IS |
| | BEING REMOVED; HOWEVER, THE LANDSCAPE PLAN ON SHEET LP1 |
| | SHOWS ALL EXISTING BUILDINGS TO REMAIN. |
| | B. LANDSCAPE PLAN DOES NOT SHOW THE MECHANICAL |
| | EQUIPMENT, GENERATOR, ETC. THAT IS BEING PROPOSED EAST |
| | OF THE LOADING AREA. |
| | |
| | 14. ADDITIONAL AREAS OF CONFLICT BETWEEN THE PLANS |
| | INCLUDE, BUT ARE NOT LIMITED TO: |
| | A. DEMOLITION PLANS SHOW THE FLAG POLE REMAINING, WHILE |
| | OTHER PLANS SHOW THAT IT IS BEING RELOCATED. PLEASE |
| | ENSURE THAT ALL PLANS ARE CONSISTENT. |
| | B. DEMOLITION PLANS SHOW AN EXISTING CONCRETE DECK |
| | REMAINING ON THE EAST SIDE OF THE EXISTING STRUCTURE, |
| | THIS IS NOT SHOWN ON THE LANDSCAPE PLANS. |
| | C. DEMOLITION PLANS SHOW THE EXISTING WOOD DECK AND |
| | ALUMINUM STAIRS ON THE EAST SIDE OF THE EXISTING |
| | BUILDING AS TO REMAIN WITH THE ADDITION OF A NEW DECK; |
| | HOWEVER OTHER PLANS SHOW THIS BEING REMOVED. |
| | D. DEMOLITION PLANS AND THE SITE PLAN SHOW THE 2 SETS |
| | OF CONCRETE STAIRS ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF THE EXISTING |
| | BUILDING AS TO BE DEMOLISHED. THE LANDSCAPE PLANS SHOW |
| | THESE STAIRS REMAINING AS-IS. |
| | E. DEMOLITION PLANS SHOW AN EXISTING WOOD FENCE NEAR |
| | THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF THE BUILDING AS REMAINING, THIS |
| | FENCE IS NOT SHOWN ON ANY OF THE OTHER PLANS (I.E. |
| | LANDSCAPE PLANS). |
| | F. LANDSCAPE PLANS DO NOT SHOW ANY SIDEWALK, ETC. |
| | LEADING TO THE EASTERN-MOST ALUMINUM PORTABLE BUILDING |
| | AND THE SITE PLAN IS UNCLEAR. |
| | |
| | ALL PLANS NEED TO BE CONSISTENT AND REFLECT THE SAME |
| | SCOPE OF WORK. THERE ARE NUMEROUS INCONSISTENCIES |
| | BETWEEN THE SITE PLAN, LANDSCAPE PLAN, CIVIL PLANS, |
| | ETC. |
| | |
| | 15. LANDSCAPE PLAN SHOWS THE ADDITION CONSISTING OF |
| | 12,000 SQUARE FEET, HOWEVER THE PERMIT APPLICATION |
| | REFERENCES AN ADDITION OF 6,000 SQUARE FEET. |
| | |
| | 16. PURSUANT TO SECTION 94-443(C)(3) OF THE CITY'S |
| | ZLDRS, EACH TERMINAL ISLAND SHALL CONTAIN A SHADE OR |
| | FLOWERING TREE. IN THE NORTHERN PARKING LOT, NO TREE IS |
| | SHOWN AT THE SOUTH END OF THE EASTERN ROW OF PARKING. |
| | ADDITIONALLY, NO PLANTING ARE SHOWN IN THE TERMINAL |
| | ISLAND IN THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF THE SOUTH PARKING |
| | LOT. |
| | |
| | 17. PURSUANT TO SECTION 94-443(C)(3) OF THE CITY'S |
| | ZLDRS, INTERMEDIATE ISLANDS SHALL CONTAIN A SHADE OR |
| | FLOWERING TREE. NO PLANTINGS ARE SHOWN IN THE ISLANDS |
| | NEAR THE COVERED ENTRY ON WEST SIDE OF EXISTING |
| | BUILDING. |
| | |
| | 18. LANDSCAPE PLAN SHALL PROVIDE A TABULATION TABLE |
| | INDICATING COMPLIANCE WITH ARTICLE XIV OF THE ZLDRS. |
| | THE ENTIRE LEASE AREA SHALL COMPLY WITH ALL OF THE |
| | PROVISIONS CONTAINED WITHIN ARTICLE XIV. |
| | A. ONE SHADE TREE SHALL BE PANTED FOR EVERY 1600 SQUARE |
| | FEET OPEN SPACE. |
| | B. ONE FLOWERING TREE SHALL BE PLANTED FOR EVERY 6400 |
| | SQUARE FEET OF OPEN SPACE. |
| | C. ONE SHRUB SHALL BE PLANTED FOR EACH 500 SQUARE FEET |
| | OF OPEN SPACE. |
| | D. A MINIMUM OF 30 POINTS SHALL BE PROVIDED IN |
| | ACCORDANCE WITH THE XERISCAPE REQUIREMENTS OF SECTION |
| | 94-442(G) OF THE CITY'S ZLDRS. |
| | |
| | 19. PLEASE CONSIDER RECONFIGURING THE FENCING AROUND |
| | THE EXISTING EDUCATION OFFICES, SOUTH PARKING LOT, ETC. |
| | I BELIEVE THERE ARE ALTERNATIVE LOCATIONS FOR THE FENCE |
| | THAT WOULD BE JUST AS SECURE, WHILE PROVIDE FOR A MORE |
| | AESTHETIC LOOK. |
| | |
| | 20. THE LANDSCAPE PLAN SHOWS AN EXISTING FENCE CROSSING |
| | THE INGRESS/EGRESS DRIVE INTO THE SOUTH PARKING LOT. IS |
| | THIS GOING TO BE REPLACED WITH A GATE? IF SO, PLEASE |
| | PROVIDE DETAIL AS TO THE PROPOSED GATE?IS IT SLIDING? |
| | |
| | 21. PLEASE ENSURE THAT THE LANDSCAPE PLAN SHOWS THE |
| | ENTIRE SITE AND THAT ALL CALCULATIONS ARE BASED UPON |
| | THE ENTIRE LEASE AREA. |
| | |
| | 22. AT THE ONE-WAY EGRESS FROM THE NORTH PARKING LOT |
| | (ADJACENT TO EXISTING STORAGE)?HOW IS THIS GOING TO BE |
| | SIGNED, ETC.? IT NEEDS TO BE CLEAR THAT THIS IS AN EXIT |
| | ONLY AND THAT THERE IS NO ENTRANCE FROM THE EXISTING |
| | DIRT ROAD. |
| | |
| | 23. PLEASE PROVIDE THE PERCENTAGE OF THE EXISTING AND |
| | PROPOSED BUILDING FOUNDATIONS THAT ARE PLANTED WITH |
| | SHRUBS/HEDGES. |
| | |
| | 24. THE DEMOLITION PLANS SHOW THE PROPANE TANK |
| | REMAINING, WHILE OTHER PLANS SHOW THAT IT IS BEING |
| | RELOCATED. PLEASE CLARIFY. PURSUANT TO SECTION |
| | 94-444(B) OF THE CITY'S ZLDRS, THE PROPANE TANK SHALL |
| | BE COMPLETELY SCREENED FROM VIEW. SCREENING SHALL BE |
| | CONSTRUCTED OF BRICK, DECORATIVE CONCRETE, OTHER |
| | DECORATIVE MASONRY, OR COMPARABLY DURABLE WOOD AND |
| | STEEL. SHRUBS OR HEDGES SHALL BE PLANTED AROUND THE |
| | PERIMETER OF THE ENCLOSURE AT 2-FOOT INTERVALS. |
| | |
| | 25. ON SHEET A-101, YOU REFERENCES TO DETAILS ON SHEET |
| | A-151 ARE INCORRECT. THE DETAIL NUMBERS ARE INCORRECT. |
| | |
| | 26. SHEET A-101 SHOWS A CHAIN LINK FENCE CROSSING THE |
| | ACCESS TO THE LOADING AREA; THIS IS NOT SHOWN ON THE |
| | OTHER PLANS. THIS SHOULD BE A SOLID FENCE TO ENCLOSE |
| | THE LOADING AREA, MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT, GENERATOR, ETC. |
| | THE PLANS APPROVED BY THE ZBA INCLUDED A DECORATIVE PVC |
| | FENCE AND GATE. |
| | |
| | 27. FINAL ORDER FOR ZBA CASE NO. 3258 REQUIRED THE |
| | FOLLOWING ITEMS PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF A BUILDING |
| | PERMIT: |
| | A. ALL NECESSARY APPROVALS TO ACCOMMODATE ANY DRAINAGE |
| | THAT MAY BE REQUIRED OUTSIDE OF THE LEASE AREA. |
| | B. WAIVERS AND EASEMENT RELEASES FROM ALL APPLICABLE |
| | UTILITY COMPANIES (I.E. FPL) TO CONSTRUCT IMPROVEMENTS |
| | WITHIN THEIR EASEMENTS. IF SUCH APPROVALS ARE NOT |
| | GRANTED, THE SITE PLANS SHALL BE ADJUSTED ACCORDINGLY. |
| | TREES, FENCING, ETC. ARE PROPOSED WITHIN THESE |
| | EASEMENTS AND SHALL BE APPROVED BY THE EASEMENT |
| | HOLDERS. ADDITIONALLY, SOME OF FPL'S EQUIPMENT WILL BE |
| | ENCLOSED WITHIN A FENCE?IS THIS ACCEPTABLE TO FPL? |
| | |
| | 28. PLEASE PROVIDE EVIDENCE THAT THE BUILD-OUT DATE FOR |
| | THE PALM BEACH COUNTY TRAFFIC CONCURRENCY APPROVAL HAS |
| | BEEN EXTENDED AND IS STILL VALID. THE ORIGINAL APPROVAL |
| | EXPIRED ON DECEMBER 31, 2011. |
| | |
| | 29. LANDSCAPE PLANS SHALL BE SUBMITTED UNDER A SEPARATE |
| | PERMIT APPLICATION AND SHALL BE ACCOMPANIED BY A |
| | CERTIFIED COST ESTIMATE. |
| | |
| | 30. ALL LANDSCAPE AREAS SHALL BE IRRIGATED. IRRIGATION |
| | PLANS SHALL BE SUBMITTED UNDER A SEPARATE PERMIT |
| | APPLICATION AND SHALL CONFORM TO THE REQUIREMENTS OF |
| | ARTICLE XIV OF THE CITY'S ZLDRS. |
| | |
| | 31. THERE ARE SEVERAL AREAS WHERE PROPOSED LANDSCAPING |
| | IS LOCATED ON TOP OF, OR IMMEDIATELY ADJACENT TO |
| | DRAINAGE PIPES ASSOCIATED WITH THE STORM WATER SYSTEM. |
| | PLEASE INDICATE IF THIS CAUSES ANY ISSUES. |
| | |
| | 32. PURSUANT TO SECTION 94-443(B) OF THE CITY'S ZLDRS, |
| | NONRESIDENTIAL USES SHALL BE BUFFERED WHEN ADJACENT TO |
| | A PUBLIC THOROUGHFARE BY A LANDSCAPE AREA OF NOT LESS |
| | THAN 5 FEET IN WIDTH. THE BUFFER SHALL NOT BE |
| | INTERRUPTED BY MORE THAN 25 PERCENT OF ITS LENGTH BY |
| | ACCESS DRIVES, ETC. AND SHALL CONTAIN AT LEAST 1 SHADE |
| | OR FLOWERING TREE FOR EACH 30 LINEAR FEET. |
| | |
| | ___________________________________________ |
| | |
| | PLEASE NOTE THAT SUBMITTAL OF ADDITIONAL AND/OR REVISED |
| | MATERIALS MAY RESULT IN NEW PLAN REVIEW COMMENTS. |
| | ___________________________________________ |
| | |
| | QUESTIONS/COMMENTS, PLEASE CONTACT THE FOLLOWING: |
| | |
| | JOHN ROACH, SENIOR PLANNER |
| | CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH |
| | DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT ? PLANNING DIVISION |
| | 401 CLEMATIS STREET - P.O. BOX 3366 |
| | WEST PALM BEACH, FLORIDA 33402 |
| | |
| | PHONE: 561.822.1435 |
| | FAX: 561.822.1460 |
| | |
| | EMAIL: [email protected] |
| | |
| | WWW.CITYOFWPB.COM |
| | |