| Date |
Text |
| 2011-10-14 13:27:32 | ****CORRECTIONS**** |
| | SAMANTHA HILL, BUILDING PLANS EXAMINER |
| | 561-805-6724 [email protected] |
| | FBC FLORIDA BUILDING CODE 2007 |
| | FBC R FLORIDA BUILDING CODE 2007 RESIDENTIAL |
| | |
| | 1. PLANS APPEAR TO INCLUDE INCORRECT ADDRESS, CONFLICTS |
| | WITH APPLICATION, PLEASE CORRELATE. |
| | |
| | 2. ORIENTATION OF NORTH APPEAR TO CONFLICT ON VARIOUS |
| | SHEETS; FOR INSTANCE, SEE U1 AND A 1A. DUE TO |
| | CONFLICTING INFORMATION IT IS UNCLEAR WHETHER THE 1 |
| | HOUR RATED WALL SHOWN ON A1A IS THE WALL FACING THE |
| | EAST PROPERTY LINE OR THE STREET TO THE WEST. NOTE THAT |
| | THE WALL WHICH (BASED ON SHEET U1) SHOULD FACE THE |
| | PROPERTY LINE HAS A WINDOW IN THE WALL; WHEN SUBMITTING |
| | PRODUCT APPROVALS ADDRESS BOTH FIRE RESISTANCE AS WELL |
| | AS IMPACT PROTECTION FOR THE DRIVE THROUGH WINDOW. SEE |
| | ALSO FBC TABLE 704.8 (OPENINGS IN RATED WALLS). REVISE |
| | PLAN TO SHOW COMPLIANCE WITH FBC TABLE 602 AND TABLE |
| | 704.8. |
| | |
| | 3. THERE APPEARS TO BE A CATCH BASIN IN THE ACCESSIBLE |
| | ROUTE, SEE GR1, SEE FBC 11 4.5.4, GRATINGS AND REVISE |
| | PLAN TO SHOW COMPLIANCE. |
| | |
| | 4. ORIENTATION OF STRUCTURE IS NOT CLEAR, SEE OTHER |
| | COMMENTS, BUT IT APPEARS THAT THE ONLY EXIT IS COVERED |
| | BY THE SAME STRUCTURE AS THE PROPOSED FUEL CANOPY. IS |
| | THIS CORRECT AND DESIGNER'S INTENT? |
| | |
| | 5. IT APPEARS THAT THE PROPOSED FUEL CANOPY COVERS HALF |
| | OF THE ACCESSIBLE PARKING SPACE. PROVIDE MORE |
| | INFORMATION REGARDING THE STRUCTURE AND HOW IT WILL |
| | AFFECT THE ACCESSIBLE ROUTE AND EXIT AS IT IS NOT CLEAR |
| | WHERE STRUCTURAL SUPPORTS WILL BE. SEE ALSO FBC 11 |
| | 4.6.5, VERTICAL CLEARANCE. |
| | |
| | 6. PROVIDE A LIFE SAFETY PLAN WHICH INCLUDES THE |
| | FOLLOWING INFORMATION: |
| | |
| | OCCUPANCY CLASSIFICATION; THIS SHOULD BE EITHER ONE |
| | OCCUPANCY OR MIXED OCCUPANCY, AND IF MIXED OCCUPANCY, |
| | PLAN SHOULD DESIGNATE EACH OCCUPANCY WITH SQUARE FOOT |
| | AREA OF EACH. ALSO REVISE A1B WHICH SHOWS OCCUPANCY AS |
| | B M. IT APPEARS THAT THE PLAN INCLUDES MERCANTILE, |
| | BUSINESS, AND STORAGE; NOTE AREAS WITH OCCUPANT LOAD |
| | CALCULATIONS. |
| | |
| | OCCUPANT LOAD BASED ON SQUARE FOOT AREA AND USE, SEE |
| | FBC TABLE 1004.1.1. |
| | |
| | TRAVEL DISTANCES, INCLUDING COMMON PATH OF TRAVEL |
| | |
| | IN MAKING THE DECISION AS TO WHO WILL PREPARE THE LIFE |
| | SAFETY PLAN AND ADDRESS OTHER EXITING CONCERNS, PLEASE |
| | SEE: |
| | |
| | HTTP://WWW.FLENG.ORG/LEGAFF.CFM?PICKED=81 FOR A LINK TO |
| | A BUILDING OFFICIALS GUIDE TO DESIGN PROFESSIONAL |
| | PRACTICE OF ARCHITECTS & ENGINEERS IN FLORIDA, OR SEE |
| | THE FOLLOWING FOR A DIRECT LINK TO THE DOCUMENT: |
| | |
| | HTTP://WWW.FLENG.ORG/IMAGES/FILES/03012011%20PUBLISH%20 |
| | -%20BUILDING_OFFICIALS_GUIDE_TO_DESIGN_PROFESSIONAL_PRA |
| | CTICE%20-.PDF |
| | |
| | 7. BASED ON BUILDING AREA SHOWN ON SHEET 1, 2500 SF, |
| | AND FBC TABLE 1004.1.1 (30 SF PER OCCUPANT FOR |
| | MERCANTILE, GROSS FLOOR AREA), IT APPEARS THAT TWO |
| | EXITS MAY BE REQUIRED, FBC 1015. PROVIDE CALCULATIONS |
| | FOR OCCUPANT LOAD AND EXITING RATIONALE. |
| | |
| | 8. DOOR 1 IS DEPICTED IN THE PLAN AS A SLIDING DOOR, |
| | SHEET A16 SCHEDULE CALLS FOR A SWING DOOR. SEE FBC |
| | 1008.3.3 REGARDING REQUIREMENTS FOR SLIDING DOOR, |
| | REVISE PLAN TO SHOW COMPLIANCE AND SUBMIT PRODUCT |
| | APPROVAL IS DESIGN INTENT IS A SLIDING DOOR IN THIS |
| | LOCATION. |
| | |
| | 9. DOOR 7 IS LOCATED IN A FIRE PARTITION, SEE FBC706.7, |
| | SPECIFY FIRE RATING FOR DOOR. |
| | |
| | 10. PROVIDE PRODUCT APPROVALS FOR ALL COMPONENTS AND |
| | CLADDING, FBC1609 (DOORS, STOREFRONT, DRIVE THROUGH |
| | WINDOW, BULLET PROOF/IMPACT WINDOWS, ROOF, ROOF STANDS, |
| | ETC.). |
| | |
| | 11. PROVIDE DETAILS FOR THE FIRE RATED WALLS AND OTHER |
| | ELEMENTS REQUIRED FOR BUILDING TYPE VA, FBC 703. |
| | |
| | 12. IMPACT FEE ASSESSMENT REQUIRED, PLEASE CONTACT PALM |
| | BEACH COUNTY, 561 233 5025. |
| | |
| | 13. PROVIDE A SOILS INVESTIGATION REPORT, FBC 1802.4. |
| | |
| | |
