| Date |
Text |
| 2012-02-03 17:01:54 | FAILED |
| | |
| | PLEASE RESPOND TO REVIEW COMMENTS IN WRITTEN FORMAT. |
| | |
| | 1. REPEAT COMMENT: PLEASE PROVIDE THE TABULATION |
| | NECESSARY FOR THE EVALUATION OF COMPLIANCE WITH ARTICLE |
| | XIV OF THE ZONING AND LAND DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS, |
| | INCLUDING THE XERISCAPE DESIGN OPTIONS. EXAMPLE - |
| | 22,590 SQ. FT. OF OPEN SPACE @ ONE SHADE, FLOWERING OR |
| | FRUIT TREE FOR EVERY 1,200 SQ. FT. = 19 TREES REQUIRED. |
| | |
| | 2. THE PLANT LIST CALLS OUT "CALUSIA SM LEAF". IS THIS |
| | MEANT TO BE THE SMALL LEAF CLUSIA (CLUSIA GUTTIFERA) |
| | TREE OR THE CLUSA (HAMELIA PATENS) SHRUB? |
| | |
| | 3. THE PLANT LIST SHOWS 4 LIGUSTRUM TREES, YET THE |
| | SYMBOLS SEEM TO SHOW 5 ON THE PLAN. |
| | |
| | 4. THE "EXISTING 24 FOOT COCONUT PALM TO REMAIN" SHOWN |
| | ON THE WESTERN SIDE OF THE LOT, CAN BE SEEN ON THE |
| | EASTERN SIDE OF THE LOT ON THE GOOGLE STREET VIEW. |
| | PLEASE EXPLAIN/CORRECT. |
| | |
| | 5. THE SITE DOES NOT APPEAR TO HAVE A SUFFICIENT NUMBER |
| | OF SHADE, FLOWERING OR FRUIT TREES. THERE APPEAR TO |
| | ONLY BE 6 ON-SITE. PLEASE NOTE THAT ONLY 35% OF THE |
| | REQUIRED TREES MAY BE SUBSTITUTED WITH PALM TREES. THIS |
| | ALLOWS ONLY PERMITS 7 REQUIRED TREES TO BE REPLACED |
| | WITH PALMS. PLEASE ENSURE THAT THIS IS SHOWN ON THE |
| | PLANS AS WELL AS COMPLY WITH THE PALM CONVERSION LISTED |
| | IN ARTICLE XIV. |
| | |
| | 6. PLEASE CLEARLY DIFFERENTIATE THE TREES AND SHRUBS ON |
| | THE PLANT LIST. |
| | |
| | 7) NOT ALL TREE AND SHRUB SYMBOLS ARE IDENTIFIED ON THE |
| | PLAN. |
| | |
| | CONTACT ERIC SCHNEIDER @ (561) 822-1446. |
