| Date |
Text |
| 2011-03-10 10:10:16 | ****CORRECTIONS**** |
| | SAMANTHA HILL, BUILDING PLANS EXAMINER |
| | 561-805-6724 [email protected] |
| | FBC FLORIDA BUILDING CODE 2007 |
| | FBC R FLORIDA BUILDING CODE 2007 RESIDENTIAL |
| | |
| | 1. SEVERAL DIFFERENT DCA DOCUMENTS WERE SUBMITTED (TWO |
| | DIFFERENT LETTERS, TWO DIFFERENT PLANS, REPRESENTING AT |
| | LEAST THREE DIFFERENT SHEDS). |
| | |
| | A. THE ACCEPTANCE LETTER SUBMITTED FOR LARK BUILDERS, |
| | RENEWAL OF ID MFT-114 HAS AN EXPIRATION DATE OF |
| | 12/16/10. |
| | |
| | B. THE SHED PLAN FOR LARK BUILDERS (PLAN485-003L) DOES |
| | NOT CORRELATE WITH THE EXPIRED LETTER. THIS PLAN HAS A |
| | CURRENT APPROVAL (SEE WWW.FLORIDABUILDING.ORG) BUT IT |
| | IS NOT CLEAR IF THIS IS THE SHED PROPOSED. |
| | |
| | C. A DCA APPROVAL LETTER WAS SUBMITTED FOR SUPERIOR |
| | SHEDS, ID MFT-113. IT IS NOT CLEAR IF THIS CORRELATES |
| | WITH THE SUPERIOR SHEDS PLAN. |
| | |
| | D. A PLAN WAS SUBMITTED FOR SUPERIOR SHEDS, DCA |
| | #SSI-2220. THE PLAN HAS THE FOLLOWING NOTE: "SHED |
| | DESIGNED TO BE PLACED ADJACENT TO EXISTING STRUCTURE. |
| | SHED IS FREE STANDING AND NOT RIGIDLY ATTACHED TO |
| | EXISTING HOST STRUCTURE." THIS CONFLICTS WITH THE SITE |
| | PLAN SUBMITTED WHICH SHOWS A MINIMUM 6' SEPARATION |
| | BETWEEN THE SHED AND THE EXISTING HOUSE. |
| | |
| | IT IS IMPOSSIBLE TO DETERMINE WHICH SHED IS TO BE |
| | ISSUED WITH THIS PERMIT AND DOCUMENTATION IS NOT |
| | COMPLETE. PLEASE VERIFY WHICH SHED IS PROPOSED, |
| | PROVIDETWO SETS OF THE FOLLOWING: |
| | |
| | ACCEPTANCE LETTER |
| | PLAN |
| | DCA COVER SHEET FROM THE WEBSITE WOULD BE HELPFUL TO |
| | VERIFY COMPLIANCE (WWW.FLORIDABUILDING.ORG) |
| | |
| | |
| | |
