| Date |
Text |
| 2010-10-13 12:50:28 | ****CORRECTIONS**** |
| | |
| | SAMANTHA HILL, BUILDING PLANS EXAMINER |
| | 561-805-6724 [email protected] |
| | FBC FLORIDA BUILDING CODE 2007 |
| | FBC R FLORIDA BUILDING CODE 2007 RESIDENTIAL |
| | |
| | 1. AS AN ARCHITECT SIGNED AND SEALED THE STRUCTURAL |
| | REPAIR, PLEASE SHOW HOW THIS IS INCIDENTAL TO HIS |
| | PRACTICE OF ARCHITECTURE, FS481. |
| | |
| | PLEASE FEEL FREE TO CONTACT ME AT YOUR CONVENIENCE IF |
| | YOU NEED ASSISTANCE OR CLARIFICATION. |
| | |
| | 2. PROVIDE A PLAN WHICH SHOWS LOCATION OF PROPOSED |
| | REPAIRS RELATIVE TO THE STRUCTURE. |
| | |
| | 3. THE LETTER (ROOF TRUSS REPAIR) QUOTES SECTION 506 OF |
| | THE EXISTING BUILDING CODE, WHICH MAKES REFERENCE TO |
| | STRUCTURAL AND NON STRUCTURAL REPAIRS, DNAGEROUS |
| | CONDITIONS, SUBSTANTIAL IMPROVEMENT, ETC. IT IS NOT |
| | CLEAR WHY THE ENTIRE CODE SECTION WAS QUOTED AS THEY |
| | CANNOT ALL APPLY TO THIS JOB. PLEASE CLARIFY CODE |
| | INTENT. |
| | |
| | 4. IT IS NOT CLEAR WHETHER OR NOT THE GABLE BRACING |
| | DETAIL WILL BE SUFFICIENT TO RESIST WIND LOADS FBC1609. |
| | THE DETAIL PROVIDED DOES NOT APPEAR TO BE SUFFICIENT AS |
| | IT DOES NOT HAVE ALL COMPONENTS WHICH ARE STANDARD FOR |
| | GABLE RETROFIT. SOME EXAMPLES: SOME COMPONENTS ARE |
| | SHOWN GRAPHICALLY BUT NOT IDENTIFIED, SUCH AS THE |
| | RECTANGLE WHICH SECURES THE DIAGONAL BRACE. LANGUAGE |
| | STATES IT IS "SECURED W/RATED BRACKET" BUT DOES NOT |
| | SPECIFY A CONNECTOR. BRACING AT THE TOP OF THE GABLE IS |
| | NOT SHOWN, BUT IS TYPICAL IN |
| | |
| | 5. DESIGNER IS TO STATE WIND DESIGN CRITERIA. REPAIR IS |
| | TO COMPLY WITH THE WIND DESIGN CRITERIA. |
| | |
| | 6. PLEASE INCLUDE GABLE HEIGHT ON THE PLAN, FBC1609. |
| | |
| | |
