| Date |
Text |
| 2010-10-14 12:40:32 | ****CORRECTIONS**** |
| | SAMANTHA HILL, BUILDING PLANS EXAMINER |
| | 561-805-6724 [email protected] |
| | FBC FLORIDA BUILDING CODE 2007 |
| | FBC R FLORIDA BUILDING CODE 2007 RESIDENTIAL |
| | |
| | THIRD REVIEW, SAME PLANS SUBMITTED AS #2 EXCEPT PLANS |
| | ARE FULL SIZE AND SIGNED & SEALED |
| | |
| | COMMENTS REMAIN THE SAME FROM PREVIOUS LIST FOR |
| | CONSISTENCY: |
| | |
| | 1. FROM PREVIOUS REVIEW, PLEASE REVISE THE PLAN TO |
| | INCLUDE INFORMATION REGARDING THE ACCESSIBLE ROUTE AND |
| | THE ACCESSIBLE ENTRANCE(S). BASED ON INFORMATION |
| | PROVIDED REGARDING THE SITE, THE ACCESSIBLE SPACES |
| | SHOWN ARE NOT LOCATED ON THE SHORTEST ACCESSIBLE ROUTE, |
| | SEE FBC11-4.6.2. |
| | |
| | 2ND REVIEW, BASED ON THE NEW INFORMATION PROVIDED, IT |
| | APPEARS THAT THE ACCESSIBLE PARKING IS LOCATED FARTHER |
| | FROM THE ACCESSIBLE ENTRANCE THAN OTHER SPACES. IT |
| | APPEARS THAT, RATHER THAN CREATE AN ACCESSIBLE ROUTE |
| | FROM FARTHER PARKING SPACES, THE ROUTE SHOULD BE |
| | CREATED FROM THE PARKING SPACES WHICH ARE CLOSEST TO |
| | THE ACCESSIBLE ENTRANCE. |
| | |
| | 3RD REVIEW, SEE COMMENT FROM 2ND REVIEW. ALSO PLEASE |
| | NOTE THAT ONE OF THE PROPOSED ROUTE DIRECTS THE |
| | ACCESSIBLE ROUTE THROUGH TRAFFIC COMING IN OFF OF THE |
| | STREET. AS THIS IS A PARKING LOT, IT APPEARS THAT THE |
| | ACCESSIBLE ROUTE WILL CROSS TRAFFIC REGARDLESS OF |
| | LOCATION (AS IS TYPICAL OF MOST LARGE PARKING LOT |
| | CONFIGURATIONS). PLEASE SEE FBC11-4.6.2, ACCESSIBLE |
| | PARKING SPACES SHALL BE LOCATED ON THE SHORTEST SAFELY |
| | ACCESSIBLE ROUTE OF TRAVEL FROM ADJACENT PARKING TO AN |
| | ACCESSIBLE ENTRANCE. |
| | |
| | 2. PLEASE PROVIDE DETAILS FOR THE RAMPS PROPOSED. NOTE |
| | THAT RAMPS ARE TO COMPLY WITH FBC11-4.7 (CURB RAMPS) OR |
| | FBC11-4.8 (RAMPS). |
| | |
| | 2ND REVIEW, THE PLAN PROVIDED APPEARS TO BE AN 8 1/2" X |
| | 11" REDUCED SHEET BASED ON A 24"X36" PLAN. IT IS VERY |
| | DIFFICULT TO READ. SOME NUMBERS ARE ENTIRELY ILLEGIBLE |
| | DUE TO THE VERY SMALL SIZE. PLEASE SUBMIT FULL SIZE |
| | PLANS. SEE FBC106, PLANS ARE TO BE LEGIBLE. |
| | |
| | A SP2, RAMP IS LABELED AS A CURB RAMP BUT NOT DRAWN AS |
| | SUCH, SEE FBC 11 FIGURE 12. |
| | |
| | SP2, SEE FBC 11 4.29.2 AND FIGURE 11 40. IT IS NOT |
| | CLEAR WHY THE DETECTABLE WARNING IN DETAIL A IS ON AN |
| | ANGLE, DETAIL B IS A SEMICIRCLE. A COMPLETE REVIEW OF |
| | THE DETAILS HAS NOT BEEN DONE AT THIS TIME PENDING A |
| | FULL SIZE DETAIL WITH LEGIBLE TEXT. |
| | |
| | 3. SOME DETECTABLE WARNINGS ARE IN A SEMICIRCLE |
| | CONFIGURATION OR ON AN ANGLE, PLEASE CLARIFY. PLEASE |
| | SEE EXAMPLES NOTED IN 2ND REVIEW ITEM 2. ALSO SEE |
| | FBC11-4.7, REGARDING CURB RAMP DETECTABLE WARNINGS. |
| | |
| | 4-5. ADDRESSED. |
| | |
| | 6. PROVIDE A COPY OF THE CONTRACT FOR THIS JOB. |
| | |
| | NOT ADDRESSED; THIRD REQUEST. THE CONTRACT SHOULD |
| | INCLUDE A COST BREAKDOWN, FBC11-4.1.6(2). |
| | |
| | 7. DETAIL 2 SP1, HANDICAP PARKING SIGN TO INCLUDE THE |
| | FINE AND THE 84" DIMENSION SHOULD BE FROM GRADE TO |
| | BOTTOM OF SIGN (DIMENSION APPEARS TO BE RELATED TO |
| | FOOTING), FBC11-4.6.4. |
| | |
| | 8. (NEW COMMENT, THIRD REVIEW) - PLEASE NOTE THAT MOST |
| | ITEMS CAN BE PROVISO OR REDLINE ITEMS AFTER RESOLUTION |
| | OF THE LOCATION ISSUE. |
| | |
| | |
