| Date |
Text |
| 2010-09-16 14:46:31 | ****CORRECTIONS**** |
| | SAMANTHA HILL, BUILDING PLANS EXAMINER |
| | 561-805-6724 [email protected] |
| | FBC FLORIDA BUILDING CODE 2007 |
| | FBC R FLORIDA BUILDING CODE 2007 RESIDENTIAL |
| | |
| | COMMENTS REMAIN THE SAME FROM PREVIOUS LIST FOR |
| | CONSISTENCY: |
| | |
| | 1. FROM PREVIOUS REVIEW, PLEASE REVISE THE PLAN TO |
| | INCLUDE INFORMATION REGARDING THE ACCESSIBLE ROUTE AND |
| | THE ACCESSIBLE ENTRANCE(S). BASED ON INFORMATION |
| | PROVIDED REGARDING THE SITE, THE ACCESSIBLE SPACES |
| | SHOWN ARE NOT LOCATED ON THE SHORTEST ACCESSIBLE ROUTE, |
| | SEE FBC11-4.6.2. |
| | |
| | 2ND REVIEW, BASED ON THE NEW INFORMATION PROVIDED, IT |
| | APPEARS THAT THE ACCESSIBLE PARKING IS LOCATED FARTHER |
| | FROM THE ACCESSIBLE ENTRANCE THAN OTHER SPACES. IT |
| | APPEARS THAT, RATHER THAN CREATE AN ACCESSIBLE ROUTE |
| | FROM FARTHER PARKING SPACES, THE ROUTE SHOULD BE |
| | CREATED FROM THE PARKING SPACES WHICH ARE CLOSEST TO |
| | THE ACCESSIBLE ENTRANCE. |
| | |
| | 2. PLEASE PROVIDE DETAILS FOR THE RAMPS PROPOSED. NOTE |
| | THAT RAMPS ARE TO COMPLY WITH FBC11-4.7 (CURB RAMPS) OR |
| | FBC11-4.8 (RAMPS). |
| | |
| | 2ND REVIEW, THE PLAN PROVIDED APPEARS TO BE AN 8 1/2" X |
| | 11" REDUCED SHEET BASED ON A 24"X36" PLAN. IT IS VERY |
| | DIFFICULT TO READ. SOME NUMBERS ARE ENTIRELY ILLEGIBLE |
| | DUE TO THE VERY SMALL SIZE. PLEASE SUBMIT FULL SIZE |
| | PLANS. SEE FBC106, PLANS ARE TO BE LEGIBLE. |
| | |
| | A SP2, RAMP IS LABELED AS A CURB RAMP BUT NOT DRAWN AS |
| | SUCH, SEE FBC 11 FIGURE 12. |
| | |
| | SP2, SEE FBC 11 4.29.2 AND FIGURE 11 40. IT IS NOT |
| | CLEAR WHY THE DETECTABLE WARNING IN DETAIL A IS ON AN |
| | ANGLE, DETAIL B IS A SEMICIRCLE. A COMPLETE REVIEW OF |
| | THE DETAILS HAS NOT BEEN DONE AT THIS TIME PENDING A |
| | FULL SIZE DETAIL WITH LEGIBLE TEXT. |
| | |
| | 3. PROVIDE DETAILS FOR ALL PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION. RAMPS |
| | AND DETECTABLE WARNINGS ARE SHOWN ON THE PLAN, PLEASE |
| | PROVIDE DETAILS. |
| | |
| | 2ND REVIEW, PLEASE PROVIDE A FULL SIZE PLAN FOR REVIEW. |
| | |
| | 4. REVISE PLAN TO PROVIDE ENOUGH INFORMATION TO SHOW |
| | SITE CONDITIONS. FOR INSTANCE, I CANNOT DETERMINE WHAT |
| | AREAS ARE LANDSCAPE, WALLS, OR SIDEWALKS. THIS |
| | INFORMATION IS REQUIRED TO DETERMINE WHETHER OR NOT |
| | EDGE PROTECTION WOULD BE REQUIRED, FBC11-4.8.7. THIS IS |
| | NOT REQUIRED FOR THE ENTIRE SITE, BUT SHOULD BE |
| | PROVIDED FOR AREAS OF CONSTRUCTION. |
| | |
| | PLEASE SEE OTHER COMMENTS REGARDING FULL SIZE PLANS. MY |
| | UNDERSTANDING IS THAT THERE IS A WALL LOCATED ADJACENT |
| | TO THE SIDEWALK, BUT NOT SHOWN ON THE PLAN. IT IS NOT |
| | CLEAR WHAT ELEMENTS ARE BETWEEN THE EXISTING ACCESSIBLE |
| | PARKING SPACE (WHICH YOU PROPOSE TO ELIMINATE) AND THE |
| | ACCESSIBLE ENTRANCE. |
| | |
| | 5. THE PLAN IS TO INCLUDE THE NAME AND SIGNATURE OF THE |
| | INDIVIDUAL TAKING RESPONSIBILITY FOR THE DESIGN (MUST |
| | BE A LICENSED PROFESSIONAL). |
| | |
| | 2ND REVIEW, DOCUMENTS PREPARED BY AN ARCHITECT AND |
| | SUBMITTED FOR PUBLIC RECORD ARE TO BE SIGNED, SEALED, |
| | DATED ORIGINALS FS481. |
| | |
| | 6. PROVIDE A COPY OF THE CONTRACT FOR THIS JOB. |
| | |
| | 7. (NEW COMMENT) DETAIL 2 SP1, HANDICAP PARKING SIGN TO |
| | INCLUDE THE FINE AND THE 84" DIMENSION SHOULD BE FROM |
| | GRADE TO BOTTOM OF SIGN (DIMENSION APPEARS TO BE |
| | RELATED TO FOOTING), FBC11-4.6.4. |
| | |
| | |
| | |
