| Date |
Text |
| 2010-10-25 11:39:07 | FAILED |
| | |
| | 1) THE DIMENSION LISTED FOR THE ADDITION???S PROJECTION |
| | TO THE EAST (INCLUDING THE EXISTING WALL) IS 14 FEET 2 |
| | INCHES AT THE NORTH SIDE OF THE ADDITION AND 13 FEET 9 |
| | INCHES ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF THE ADDITION. PLEASE |
| | RECTIFY THESE DIMENSIONS. |
| | |
| | 2) THE SURVEY DATED OCTOBER 12, 2010 SHOWS THE WEST |
| | SETBACK FROM THE HOUSE TO THE PROPERTY LINE AS 8.0 |
| | FEET. THIS REQUIRES A 7.0 FOOT SETBACK ON THE EAST SIDE |
| | OF THE HOUSE (TOTAL SETBACK IS REQUIRED TO BE AT LEAST |
| | 15 FEET). THE PLANS SHOW THE ADDITION WITH A 6.5 FOOT |
| | SETBACK, WHICH IS NOT SUFFICIENT. IF THE ADDITION IS 13 |
| | FEET 9 INCHES (AS DESCRIBED IN COMMENT #1) THEN THE |
| | SETBACK IS 7 FEET WHEN SUBTRACTED FROM THE 20 FOOT 1 |
| | INCH SETBACK SHOWN ON THE SURVEY (SUBTRACTS 8 INCHES |
| | FOR THE EXISTING EXTERIOR WALL). IF THE ADDITION IS 14 |
| | FEET 2 INCHES, THEN THERE IS INSUFFICIENT SETBACK. THE |
| | PLANS SHALL SHOW THE ACCURATE SETBACK TO THE PROPERTY |
| | LINES BASED ON THE SURVEY AND THE ACCURATE ADDITION. |
| | PLEASE NOTE: THE SURVEY INCLUDED IN THE ORIGINAL |
| | APPLICATION SHOWED A WESTERN SETBACK OF 8.8 FEET, WHICH |
| | WOULD ALLOW A 6.2 FOOT SETBACK ON THE EAST SIDE. |
| | |
| | 3) THE VALUE OF THE PERMIT HAS INCREASED SINCE THE |
| | ORIGINAL ZONING REVIEW AND NOW THE VALUE OF THE |
| | CONSTRUCTION ($47,407) EXCEEDS 50% OF THE STRUCTURE'S |
| | VALUE ($75,667) ACCORDING TO THE P.B.C. PROPERTY |
| | APPRAISER'S OFFICE; THEREFORE, PURSUANT TO SECTION |
| | 94-441(C)(2) OF THE ZONING AND LAND DEVELOPMENT |
| | REGULATIONS (ZLDR), THE LANDSCAPE ON THE SITE SHALL BE |
| | IN COMPLIANCE WITH ALL APPLICABLE REGULATIONS FOUND IN |
| | ARTICLE XIV OF THE ZLDR. IF THE SITE CONFORMS TO |
| | ARTICLE XIV, THEN TWO (2) COPIES OF A LANDSCAPE PLAN |
| | SHOWING CONFORMANCE SHALL BE SUBMITTED WITH THE PERMIT. |
| | IF THE SITE DOES NOT CONFORM TO ARTICLE XIV, THEN A |
| | SEPARATE LANDSCAPE PERMIT AND IRRIGATION PERMIT SHALL |
| | BE SUBMITTED TO INSTALL THE MATERIAL TO BRING THE SITE |
| | INTO CONFORMITY PRIOR TO THE ZONING APPROVAL OF THIS |
| | PERMIT. |
| | |
| | 4) THE AREA OF THE ON THE EAST PORTION OF THE FRONT OF |
| | THE PROPERTY (LOCATION SHOWN ON PLANS AS NEW DRIVEWAY) |
| | SHALL CONTAIN LANDSCAPE MATERIAL IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE |
| | CITY'S LANDSCAPE REGULATIONS - SECTION 94-442(B). NO |
| | PERMIT WAS APPROVED FOR A DRIVEWAY OR STORAGE AREA AT |
| | THIS LOCATION. ANY DISTURBED PARKWAY AREA BETWEEN THE |
| | SIDEWALK AND THE ROADWAY SHALL BE SODDED IN ACCORDANCE |
| | WITH SECTION 94-442(B). THIS APPEARS TO HAVE BEEN THE |
| | CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE TO THE RECENT POOL INSTALLATION. |
| | IF THIS AREA IS NO LONGER IN A DISTURBED STATE, PLEASE |
| | PROVIDE PHOTOGRAPHIC VERIFICATION. |
| | |
| | 5) NOTE THE A/C UNITS MAY ENCROACH NO FURTHER THAN FOUR |
| | (4) FEET INTO THE EAST SETBACK. |
| | |
| | 6) NOTE THE STOOP MAY EXTEND NO CLOSER THAN TWO (2) |
| | FEET TO THE EASTERN PROPERTY LINE. |
| | |
| | 7) ANY SHRUBS REMOVED BY THE CONSTRUCTION SHALL BE |
| | RELOCATED ON-SITE. THIS SHALL BE REFLECTED ON THE |
| | LANDSCAPE PLAN. |
| | |
| | 8) ARE ANY TREES OR PALMS PROPOSED TO BE REMOVED AS |
| | PART OF THE CONSTRUCTION? IF THERE ARE, A TREE |
| | ALTERATION PERMIT FROM THE PLANNING AND ZONING |
| | DEPARTMENT IS REQUIRED PRIOR TO THE REMOVAL. |
| | APPROPRIATE ON-SITE RELOCATION OR REPLACEMENT WILL BE |
| | REQUIRED TO MITIGATE ANY TREE REMOVAL. THIS SHALL BE |
| | REFLECTED ON THE LANDSCAPE PLAN. |
| | |
| | 9) THE DRIVEWAY EXPANSION REQUIRES A SEPARATE PERMIT. |
| | |
| | CONTACT ERIC SCHNEIDER @ (561) 822-1446. |
| | |
