| Date |
Text |
| 2010-06-08 10:53:30 | PLAN REVIEWER: DEAN LAUDERMILK, PROJECT COORDINATOR |
| | PHONE: 494-1083 |
| | FAX: 494-1116 |
| | EMAIL: [email protected] |
| | PLAN STATUS: FAILED |
| | THE PLAN HAS BEEN TURNED DOWN FOR THE REASONS LISTED |
| | BELOW. IT IS SUGGESTED THAT A MEETING WITH ENGINEERING |
| | AND ZONING BE SET UP TO DISCUSS THE ISSUES PRIOR TO |
| | RESUBMITTING THE PLANS FOR REVIEW. |
| | |
| | THE PLAN HAS BEEN TURNED DOWN BECAUSE IT DOES NOT HAVE |
| | AN APPROVED STAMP FROM THE ENGINEERING SERVICES |
| | DEPARTMENT ON IT, AND HAVE YET TO BE SUBMITTED FOR |
| | REVIEW. PLEASE SUBMIT TWO SETS OF PLANS TO; |
| | THE CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH, ENGINEERING SERVICES |
| | DEPARTMENT, ATTENTION: BRIAN MOREE, ENGINEERING |
| | SERVICES CONSTRUCTION SUPERVISOR. PRIOR TO SUBMITTAL OF |
| | THE PLAN AND AFTER MEETING WITH ENGINEERING SERVICES |
| | PERSONNEL, PLEASE REVIEW AND EXPLAIN OR MAKE THESE |
| | CORRECTIONS TO THE PLAN. |
| | 1. NO SURVEY WAS ATTACHED, PLEASE SUPPLY |
| | 2. NO POLLUTION CONTROL PLAN WAS ATTACHED, PLEASE |
| | SUPPLY |
| | 3. THERE ARE TWO PROPERTIES SHOWN IN GIS (PROPERTY |
| | APPRAISERS INFORMATION), SEE GIS SNAP-SHOT. THERE |
| | SHOULD BE A UNITY OF TITLE FOR THE TWO PROPERTIES FOR |
| | THE WORK BEING DONE ON BOTH PROPERTIES. |
| | 4. THE AERIAL SHOWS A DUMPSTER ON THE EAST SIDE OF THE |
| | PROPERTY, BUT NO DUMPSTER DETAIL IS SHOWN ON THE PLAN. |
| | PLEASE SUPPLY DUMPSTER DETAILS AND SHOW LOCATION ON THE |
| | PLAN OF THE DUMPSTER ENCLOSURE. |
| | 5. THE EXISTING WATER METER BOX IN THE SIDEWALK WHICH |
| | IS TO BE REMOVED, WILL REQUIRE THE SERVICE TO BE |
| | REMOVED AT THE MAIN, BY THE CONTRACTOR. SEE COMMENT NO. |
| | 14. |
| | 6. NO STRIPPING DETAILS ARE SUPPLIED, PLEASE SUPPLY. |
| | 7. NO ADA PARKING SPACES OR A ROUTE TO THE CITY |
| | SIDEWALK ARE SUPPLIED, PLEASE SUPPLY. |
| | 8. CURRIE CRESCENT APPARENTLY RAN NORTH OF ACACIA AT |
| | ONE TIME. THERE ARE TWO DRIVEWAYS THAT EXIT INTO THESE |
| | PROPERTIES FROM THE EAST. ARE THESE LEGAL EXIT POINTS |
| | FOR THE PROPERTY TO THE EAST INTO THIS SITE? IF SO, |
| | HAVE THEY BEEN CONTACTED AND ASKED ABOUT THE REROUTING |
| | OF THE TRAFFIC, OUT TO OLIVE AND NOT CURRIE CRESCENT? |
| | 9. THE NEW PARKING LOT IS BEING ADDRESSED, BUT THE |
| | EXISTING IS NOT, WHY? |
| | 10. THE STORM SEWER SHOULD HAVE A POSITIVE OUTFALL, |
| | PLEASE SUPPLY THRU THE CATCH BASIN IN THE EXISTING |
| | PARKING LOT TO THE SOUTH. THAT CATCH BASIN OUTFALLS TO |
| | ACACIA. |
| | 11. THERE WILL NEED TO BE AN ON-GRADE LEVEL SURFACE AT |
| | LEAST 44" WIDE ACROSS THE BACK OF THE SIDEWALK FOR ADA |
| | CROSSING OF THE DRIVEWAY ON OLIVE. |
| | 12. IN SOME CASES THERE IS OVER A FOOT OF DIFFERENCE IN |
| | THE ELEVATIONS OF THE PROPERTY TO THE NORTH. PLEASE |
| | EXPLAIN HOW YOU ARE DOING THIS WITH OUT A RETENTION |
| | WALL. |
| | 13. THE SAME HOLDS TRUE FOR THE SOUTH SIDE, BUT THE |
| | DIFFERENCE IS ONLY 0.5', HOW WILL THIS BE ADDRESSED? |
| | 14.AN IRRIGATION SYSTEM IS REQUIRED WITH A RPZ BACKFLOW |
| | PREVENTER, PLEASE SUPPLY A PLAN. IT IS SUGGESTED THAT |
| | THE SERVICE ON OLIVE BE MOVED NORTH OUT OF THE WAY OF |
| | THE DRIVEWAY AND BE USED FOR IRRIGATION. |
| | 15. THE SIDEWALK REPLACEMENT OF THE EXISTING DRIVEWAY |
| | (EAST OF THE EXISTING BUILDING) IS NOT REQUIRED TO GO |
| | BACK AS A SIDEWALK, THIS IS PRIVATE PROPERTY, NOT A |
| | CITY STREET ANY LONGER. |
| | |
