| Date |
Text |
| 2010-06-08 11:32:47 | RESIDENTIAL (R3) ADDITION, BUILDING REVIEW SECOND |
| | CHECKLIST. |
| | 2007 FLORIDA RESIDENTIAL CODE WITH 2009 REVISIONS. |
| | |
| | 1- ACCORDING TO SEC. R301.2.1.4.3 OF 2009 REVISIONS TO |
| | THE 2007 FLORIDA RESIDENTIAL CODE, THIS BUILDING IS |
| | LOCATED ON EXPOSURE "C" NOT "B". REVISE WIND DESIGN |
| | CRITERIA AND THE OPENING DESIGN PRESSURES ON SHEET S1. |
| | |
| | RESPONSE: EXPOSURE WAS REVISED ON SHEET S1, BUT THE |
| | OPENING DESIGN PRESSURES WERE NOT REVISED TO REFLECT |
| | EXPOSURE "C". |
| | |
| | 2- OWES $2093.06. PERMIT FEE BALANCE. |
| | |
| | 3- PROVIDE PRODUCT APPROVALS (2 COPIES) AS REQUIRED BY |
| | DCA RULE 9B-72 FOR: |
| | A) ROOF TILE TO BE INSTALLED. |
| | |
| | RESPONSE: NOT SUBMITTED. |
| | |
| | B) ROOF TILE ADHESIVE IF USING ADHESIVE FOR TILE |
| | INSTALLATION. SEE TILE PRODUCT APPROVAL FOR LISTED |
| | ADHESIVES. SPECIFY HOW ARE TILES GOING TO BE INSTALLED. |
| | |
| | RESPONSE: NOT SUBMITTED. |
| | |
| | C) FLAT ROOF TO BE INSTALLED AND, |
| | * CLEARLY IDENTIFY WHICH APPROVED ASSEMBLY AND BASE |
| | SHEET FASTENING OPTION IS GOING TO BE USED TO VERIFY |
| | COMPLIANCE WITH THE DESIGN PRESSURES OF SEC. R301. |
| | ** PROVIDE NAIL ENHANCING FOR PERIMETER AND CORNER |
| | AREAS AS REQUIRED BY GENERAL LIMITATION #7. SEE LAST |
| | PAGE OF NOA SUBMITTED. IF RAS 117 CALCULATIONS ARE |
| | REQUIRED TO BE SIGNED AND SEALED, THEN PROVIDE SIGNED |
| | AND SEALED RAS 117 CALCULATIONS. SEE LAST PAGE OF NOA |
| | SUBMITTED. |
| | NOTE: ASSEMBLIES THAT ARE LIMITED BY GENERAL LIMITATION |
| | #9 CAN'T BE USED IN THIS BUILDING BECAUSE THEY DON'T |
| | MEET THE DESIGN PRESSURES OF SEC. R301. |
| | |
| | RESPONSE: NOT SUBMITTED. |
| | |
| | D) FRENCH DOOR: FRENCH DOOR NOA 07-0103.02 SUBMITTED |
| | EXPIRED ON FEBRUARY 24, 2010. NEED TO PROVIDE CURRENT |
| | NOA. |
| | |
| | 4- ARCHITECT TO REVIEW AND APPROVE ALL PRODUCT |
| | APPROVALS IN WRITING (NOT SIGNING AND SEALING) AS |
| | REQUIRED BY SEC. 106.3.3 CITY AMENDMENTS TO FBC. THIS |
| | APPLIES TO NEW PRODUCT APPROVALS THAT WERE MISSING WITH |
| | THIS SUBMITTAL. |
| | |
| | 5- SPECIFY ROOF VENTILATION AS REQUIRED BY SEC. R806 OF |
| | 2007 FLORIDA RESIDENTIAL CODE. |
| | |
| | ***NOTE: COORDINATE WITH INFORMATION SHOWN ON THE |
| | ENERGY CALCULATIONS. ENERGY CALCULATIONS SHOW VENTED |
| | ATTIC. |
| | |
| | RESPONSE: ARCHITECT'S PLANS DON'T SPECIFY ANY FOAM |
| | INSULATION AS SHOWN ON RESPONSE LETTER. ALSO, PLANS |
| | DON'T SPECIFY INSULATION VALUE FOR THE WALLS. AND, |
| | ENERGY CALCULATIONS WERE NOT REVISED. ARCHITECT TO |
| | SPECIFY WALL AND CEILING INSULATION ON PLANS AND |
| | COORDINATE INFORMATION WITH THE ENERGY CALCULATIONS AS |
| | REQUIRED. |
| | |
| | 6- PROVIDE COMPLETE FRAMING DETAILS AND SPECIFICATIONS |
| | FOR CANVAS ROOF TO BE REMOVED FOR NEW CONCRETE TILE TO |
| | BE INSTALLED. |
| | |
| | RESPONSE: ARCHITECT'S RESPONSE WAS THAT WORK OMITTED |
| | FROM SCOPE OF WORK, BUT SHEET A3 WAS NOT REVISED TO |
| | OMIT THIS WORK. |
| | |
| | 7- SHEET S3: ROOF FRAMING DETAIL #3 AND SECOND FLOOR |
| | FRAMING DETAIL #2 WERE REVISED AND NOW THEY ARE MISSING |
| | THE WOOD FRAMING MEMBERS. MISSING THE TOP AND BOTTOM |
| | PLATES. |
| | |
| | 8- A) ENERGY CALCULATIONS TO BE SIGNED AND DATED BY THE |
| | OWNER/AGENT. |
| | |
| | RESPONSE: NOT DONE. |
| | |
| | B) COORDINATE INFORMATION ON ENERGY CALCULATIONS WITH |
| | INFORMATION GIVEN ON THE PLANS SUBMITTED. EG: CHECK |
| | ROOF VENTILATION, ETC. SEE ITEM #5 ABOVE. |
| | |
| | RESPONSE: NOT DONE. |
| | |
| | 9- REVISE THICKNESS OF STUCCO SPECIFIED ON ALL DETAILS |
| | AND SPECIFICATIONS. EXTERIOR STUCCO TO BE 7/8" AS |
| | REQUIRED BY TABLE R702.1(1). |
| | |
| | RESPONSE: REVISE BUILDING SECTION #1 ON SHEET A2 AND |
| | NOTE S7 ON SHEET S2. |
| | |
| | 10- BRING ALL REVISED PLANS TO HISTORIC TO GET THEM |
| | RE-STAMPED PRIOR TO SUBMITTAL TO THIS OFFICE. |
| | |
| | JULIO GOMEZ |
| | COMMERCIAL COMBINATION PLANS EXAMINER |
| | (561)805-6712 |
