| Date |
Text |
| 2010-06-04 10:56:16 | ***FAILED*** |
| | |
| | 1. IRRIGATION NEEDS TO BE PROVIDED TO THE SHRUBS AROUND |
| | THE DUMPSTER ENCLOSURE. IT DOESN???T APPEAR THAT THE |
| | IRRIGATION SYSTEM IN THAT AREA, AS PROPOSED, IS ABLE TO |
| | COVER ALL OF THE PLANT MATERIAL ADEQUATELY ENOUGH TO |
| | ENSURE SURVIVAL. |
| | |
| | 2. CREDIT WAS TAKEN ON SHEET LA-2 FOR THE USE OF A |
| | MOISTURE SENSING CONTROLLER OTHER THAN A RAIN SWITCH IN |
| | THE DESIGN OPTIONS TABLE; HOWEVER, SHEET IR-2 SPECIFIES |
| | THE USE OF A RAIN BIRD MINI-CLIK RAIN SWITCH. |
| | |
| | 3. IN THE DESIGN OPTIONS TABLE ON LA-2, THE SHRUB AND |
| | TREES SECTIONS MISTAKENLY CONTAIN A REFERENCE TO |
| | ???DROUGHT TOLERANT GRASS SPECIES FROM THE LIST.??? |
| | PLEASE CHANGE ACCORDINGLY. |
| | |
| | 4. SECTION 94-444(B) OF THE ZONING CODE STATES THAT THE |
| | SCREENING OF THE DUMPSTER ENCLOSURE MUST BE CONSTRUCTED |
| | OF ??????BRICK, DECORATIVE CONCRETE, OTHER DECORATIVE |
| | MASONRY, OF COMPARABLY DURABLE WOOD OR STEEL.??? THE |
| | CITY DOES NOT VIEW THE PROPOSED GATES CONSTRUCTED OF |
| | CHAIN LINK WITH SLATS AS MEETING THE DURABILITY |
| | REQUIREMENT. WE WOULD HOWEVER, ACCEPT WOOD, PVC, OR |
| | OPAQUE STEEL GATES AS MEETING THE DURABILITY |
| | REQUIREMENT. |
| | |
| | 5. THE FINE FOR HANDICAP PARKING IS $252.00. |
| | |
| | 6. THE LANDSCAPE PLAN DID NOT INCLUDE ANY CALCULATIONS |
| | TO ALLOW US TO DETERMINE COMPLIANCE WITH THE LANDSCAPE |
| | CODE. PLEASE SEE SECTION 94-448(D)(2) FOR THE |
| | REQUIREMENTS. |
| | |
| | 7. PROVIDE SPACING AND SIZES ON THE PLANT LIST. |
| | |
| | 8. SECTION 94-443(C)(3)(A) REQUIRES THAT EACH ROW OF |
| | PARKING SPACES BE TERMINATED BY A LANDSCAPE ISLAND |
| | CONTAINING AT LEAST ONE SHADE OF FLOWERING TREE. THERE |
| | ARE THREE LOCATIONS WHERE TREES ARE MISSING. THEY ARE |
| | IN THE ISLAND OCCUPIED BY EXISTING TREE #100, EXISTING |
| | TREE # 84, AND THE ISLAND IMMEDIATELY NORTH OF THE TWO |
| | PARALLEL HANDICAP PARKING SPACES. |
| | |
| | 9. THERE ARE SEVERAL AREAS AROUND THE PERIMETER OF THE |
| | SITE WHERE THE SPACING BETWEEN TREES EXCEEDS THE 30 |
| | FOOT MINIMUM SPECIFIED BY 94-443(B)(4). ADD TREES AS |
| | NECESSARY. IN AREAS WHICH ARE IN CLOSE PROXIMITY TO |
| | UNDERGROUND UTILITIES, A ROOT BARRIER SHOULD BE USED. |
| | |
| | PLEASE CONTACT KELLY FREEMAN, GIS PLANNER, AT |
| | 561-822-1458 WITH QUESTIONS. |
| | |
