| Date |
Text |
| 2010-03-10 14:00:14 | REVISION DENIED |
| | |
| | 1) THE ORIGINAL PLANS AND PERMIT WERE ISSUED UNDER THE |
| | 2004 FBC W/2007 REVISIONS AND ASCE 7-02. THE REVISED |
| | DRAWINGS SPECIFY THE 2007 FBC AND ASCE 7-05. PLEASE |
| | CORRECT. |
| | |
| | 2) THE REVISED PLANS DO NOT CORRESPOND TO THE ORDER OR |
| | NUMBERING OF THE APPROVED PLANS. IT APPEARS THAT YOUR |
| | INTENT IS TO SUBMIT ALL NEW DRAWINGS RATHER THAN SIMPLY |
| | REVISING THE APPROVED DRAWINGS. IF THIS IS THE CASE |
| | PLEASE SUBMIT TWO COMPLETE SETS OF ARCHITECTURAL AND |
| | STRUCTURAL DRAWINGS. NEW MECHANICAL AND PLUMBING |
| | DRAWINGS WILL ALSO BE REQUIRED. |
| | |
| | 3) ON S3, THE MAXIMUM MEAN ROOF HEIGHT ( DISTANCE FROM |
| | FINISH GRADE TO MID POINT OF THE HIGHEST SLOPED ROOF) |
| | IS SPECIFIED AS 25' AND THE ACTUAL MEAN ROOF HEIGHT IS |
| | GREATER. PLEASE CORRECT. |
| | |
| | 4) ON S3, THE WORST CASE COMPONENT AND CLADDING |
| | PRESSURE FOR THE TWO STORY STRUCTURE IN EXPOSURE 'C' IS |
| | SPECIFIED AS -57 PSF. THIS APPEARS TO BE TOO LOW. |
| | PLEASE SHOW HOW THIS WAS DETERMINED. |
| | |
| | 5) THE EDGE PRESSURES ON S3 ARE BOTH SPECIFIED AS |
| | NEGATIVE. PLEASE CORRECT. |
| | |
| | 6) THE NEW PLANS INDICATE THAT THE LIVING SPACE HAS |
| | BEEN INCREASED FROM THE APPROVED PLANS. PLANS WILL NEED |
| | TO BE REVIEWED BY PALM BEACH COUNTY TO DETERMINE IF |
| | ADDITIONAL IMPACT FEES ARE DUE. |
| | |
| | 7) THE NEW PRODUCT APPROVALS ARE REQUIRED TO BE |
| | REVIEWED AND APPROVED IN WRITING BY THE DESIGNER OF |
| | RECORD OF THE PROJECT. |
| | |
| | 8) PRODUCT APPROVALS FOR SERIES 740 PROJECTED (AWNING) |
| | WINDOWS WAS SUBMITTED. THERE ARE NOT ANY OF THESE TYPE |
| | OF WINDOW SPECIFIED ON THE PLANS. PLEASE CLARIFY. |
| | |
| | 9) THE PRODUCT APPROVALS FOR THE FRENCH DOORS (NO. |
| | 07-0103.02) ARE EXPIRED. PLEASE SUBMIT CURRENT NOAS. |
| | |
| | 10) SUBMIT PRODUCT APPROVALS FOR THE ARCHED TOP WOOD |
| | FRONT DOOR (101) AND WOOD DOOR (102). |
| | |
| | 11) SPECIFY THE APPROVED ASSEMBLY, FASTENING OPTION AND |
| | MAXIMUM DESIGN PRESSURE FOR THE TAMKO MODIFIED ROOF |
| | SYSTEM THAT WILL BE INSTALLED. PROVIDE ENHANCED |
| | FASTENING CALCULATIONS IF REQUIRED TO MEET ROOF |
| | UPLIFTS. SEE LIMITATION NUMBER 7 OF THE TAMKO PRODUCT |
| | APPROVAL. |
| | |
| | 12) SUBMIT TWO COPIES OF THE MANUFACTURER'S |
| | SPECIFICATIONS/ PRODUCT EVALUATION FOR THE SPRAY FOAM |
| | INSULATION THAT WILL BE INSTALLED. |
| | |
| | 13) SUBMIT REVISED ENERGY CALCULATIONS. |
| | |
| | 14) PLEASE PROVIDE WRITTEN RESPONSES TO PLAN REVIEW |
| | COMMENTS. |
| | |
| | ROBERT MCDOUGAL |
| | BLDG. PLAN REVIEW |
| | (561)805-6714 |
| | [email protected] |
