| Plan Review Notes For Permit 10020411 |
| Permit Number |
10020411 |
|
| Review Stop |
B |
| Sequence Number |
1 |
|
| Notes |
| Date |
Text |
| 2010-02-24 11:08:00 | 2001 FBC | | | | | | REVISION DENIED | | | | | | 1) THE NUMBERING ON THE WINDOW AND DOOR INSTALLATION | | | SCHEDULE (QUOTE) DOES NOT CORRESPOND TO THE KEY PLAN. | | | PLEASE CORRECT. | | | | | | 2) THE PRODUCT APPROVAL SUBMITTED FOR THE CASEMENT | | | WINDOW IS FOR A NON-IMPACT RATED WINDOW. THE | | | INSTALLATION SCHEDULE (QUOTE) SPECIFIES THE WINDOW AS | | | IMPACT RATED. SUBMIT THE CORRECT PRODUCT APPROVAL OR | | | SUBMIT PRODUCT APPROVALS FOR THE IMPACT PROTECTION | | | SYSTEM THAT WILL BE INSTALLED. DCA RULE 9B-72 | | | | | | 3) THE REVISED COMPONENT AND CLADDING EVALUATION IS | | | REQUIRED TO HAVE THE ENGINEER'S ORIGINAL SIGNATURE AND | | | SEAL. COPIES ARE NOT ACCEPTABLE. BECAUSE THE ENGINEER | | | THAT PREPARED THE REVISED OPENING PRESSURES IS NOT THE | | | ARCHITECT OR ENGINEER OF RECORD FOR THE STRUCTURE, THE | | | DESIGNER OF RECORD IS REQUIRED TO PERFORM A SHOP | | | DRAWING REVIEW AND STAMP THE REVISED DRAWINGS OR THE | | | NEW ENGINEER IS REQUIRED TO REVIEW AND ASSUME THE WORK | | | OF THE ORIGINAL ENGINEER FOLLOWING THE PROCEDURE IN FAC | | | 61G15-27. | | | | | | 4) THE STRUCTURE WAS PERMITTED UNDER THE 2001 FBC AND | | | ASCE 7-98 IS THE REFERENCED STANDARD. THE REVISED C AND | | | C CALCULATIONS WERE DONE USING ASCE 7-05. DUE TO THIS | | | CHANGE, A SIGNED AND SEALED LETTER FROM THE NEW | | | ENGINEER STATING THAT THIS CHANGE WILL NOT HAVE ANY | | | ADVERSE EFFECT ON THE WINDLOAD DESIGN OF THE STRUCTURE | | | IS REQUIRED. | | | | | | ROBERT MCDOUGAL | | | BLDG. PLAN REVIEW | | | (561)805-6714 | | | [email protected] |
|
