Plan Review Notes
Plan Review Notes For Permit 10010548
Permit Number 10010548
Review Stop E
Sequence Number 1
Notes
Date Text
2010-02-09 15:56:34*DENIED*
  
 ** ORIGINALLY REVIEWED UNDER EXPIRED PERMIT APPLICATION
 08050795
  
  
 1) NOTE: THE PROJECT HAS BEEN SUBMITTED FOR PERMIT
 AFTER OCTOBER 1ST, 2009 AND MARCH 1ST, 2009 WHICH
 PLACES DESIGN REQUIREMENTS UNDER THE 2007 FBC W/2009
 SUPPLEMENTS AS WELL AS THE 2008 NFPA-70.
  
 2) NOTE: THE SUBMITTED FLORIDA ENERGY CALCULATIONS ARE
 NOT FROM THE CURRENT CODE CYCLE. IN FACT THEY ARE FROM
 THE 2004 FLA/COM 2.5.
 THEY ARE SUBSTANTIALLY DIFFERENT FROM NEWER CODE CYCLE
 REQUIREMENTS.
 PLEASE SEE 13-415.AB.5 FOR INTERIOR LIGHTING AND
 13-415.AB.2.2 FOR EXTERIOR LIGHTING.
 PLEASE KNOW THAT ALL ITEMS ON THE PLANS FOR THE
 CONSTRUCTION, TYPE, BUILDING CHARACTERISTICS ARE
 REQUIRED TO BE IN THE INPUT DATA REPORT OF THE
 SUBMITTED CALCULATIONS.
 THERE ARE ITEMS EVEN ON THE IDR OF THE 2004 WHICH ARE
 NOT CORRELATING WITH THE PLANS. ONE EXAMPLE IS ALL THE
 FLOOR AREAS IN THE BUILDING ARE USING CREDIT FOR CARPET
 AND RUBBER PADDING HOWEVER THIS IS NOT POSSIBLE. AREAS
 SUCH AS BATHROOMS, ELECTRICAL ROOMS/AREAS, MECHANICAL
 ROOMS AND KITCHEN ARE NOT GOING TO HAVE CARPET AND
 RUBBER PADDING NOR ARE THEY PERMITTED TO HAVE CARPET
 INSTALLED.
 THERE ARE OTHER ITEMS HOWEVER AS THE VERSION IS
 COMPLETELY DIFFERENT WE ARE NOT ABLE TO REVIEW FOR
 CURRENT CODE.
 ** PLEASE BE SURE TO GO THROUGH ALL SYSTEMS AND
 COMPONENTS. THIS WAS SPECIFICALLY MENTIONED ON THE
 ORIGINAL REVIEW. THIS OFFICE ONCE AGAIN EMPHASIZES THE
 IMPORTANCE OF ALL SYSTEMS ON PLANS TO COORDINATE WITH
 THE INPUT DATA REPORT OF THE SUBMITTED ENERGY
 CALCULATIONS. IF THERE ARE QUESTIONS, PLEASE CALL.
  
 ** THIS INCLUDES THE POWER DENSITIES ON PLANS.
 ** PLEASE BE SURE TO SEE APPENDIX B FOR TRACK LIGHTING
 AND OTHER LIGHTING FOR CALCULATIONS.
  
 3) NOTE: PLEASE SEE CODE REFERENCES ON PLANS SUCH AS
 THE 13-413 NOTES ON E001. THE SECTIONS NOTED ARE FROM
 THE ORIGINAL PRINTING OF THE 2007 FBC HOWEVER THAT
 VERSION AND PRINTING WAS NEVER ADOPTED. THE FIRST
 ADOPTED VERSION WAS THE 2007 WITH THE FIRST SET OF 2009
 SUPPLEMENTS. THIS INCLUDED A COMPLETE RE-WRITE OF FBC
 CHAPTER 13. PRESCRIPTIVE C METHODS ARE NOT IN ANY OF
 THE ADOPTED CODES.
 PLEASE VISIT THE FOLLOWING WEBSITE TO LOOK AT THE
 ADOPTED CODES, ADJUST TEXT, AND ADJUSTED CODES WHICH
 WERE SUBSTANTIALLY CHANGED AND REVISED.
  
 4) NOTE: SAME COMMENT AS PREVIOUS REVIEW WITH RESPECT
 TO RUBBER STAMPED SIGNATURE ON COMPASS SURVEYING
 SHEETS. PLEASE SEE FS 472.025.
  
 5) NOTE: PLEASE EXPLAIN RESPONSE TO PREVIOUS NOTE #10.
 THE RESPONSE STATES THE TRACK LIGHTING IS EXEMPT.
 PLEASE EXPLAIN WHERE THERE IS AN EXEMPTION IN THE
 PREVIOUS CODE OR THIS APPLICABLE CODE.
 THIS OCCUPANCY AND USE DOES NOT APPLY TO EXEMPTIONS.
 THIS IS IMPORTANT AS THE TRACK LIGHTING AS MENTIONED IN
 NOTE #2 ABOVE TRACK LIGHTING IN APPENDIX B FOR IDR IS
 MENTIONED.
  
  
 6) NOTE: LIGHTING CONTROLS FOR BATHROOMS DO NOT MEET
 13-415.AB.1.1,.1.2.
 AUTOMATED CONTROL REQUIRED ALONG WITH OVER RIDE. THE
 USE OF OCCUPANCY SENSORS TYPE DEVICES ARE PERMITTED
 HOWEVER THEY WOULD BE REQUIRED TO BE FAIL SAFE ON. THE
 RESPONSE MENTIONS ALONG WITH PLANS SHOWING A KEYED
 SWITCH TO BE LOCATED ABOVE THE CEILING. THIS IS NOT
 WHAT WAS MEANT BY THE PREVIOUS COMMENTS AND DOES NOT
 MEET FBC. PLEASE ADJUST PLANS.
 FBC 1006.1.2, NFPA-101 7.2.1.2.2
  
 7) NOTE: PLEASE SEE 13-415.AB.1.1,.1.2 FOR AREAS WHERE
 THE PLANS ONLY INDICATE SINGLE POLE SWITCHES FOR THE
 LIGHTING CONTROLS. THESE ARE SEPARATE SPACES LOCATED IN
 A BUILDING GREATER THAN 5K SQ FT.
 101A, 117A.
  
 8) NOTE: PLEASE SUBMIT MANUFACTURES SPECS/CUT SHEETS
 FOR NEW PROPOSED MTS. THE RESPONSE MENTIONS TO SEE
 ATTACHED HOWEVER NO SPECS COULD BE LOCATED IN PACKAGE.
  
 9) NOTE: AS NOTED ON PREVIOUS REVIEW AS KITCHEN
 EQUIPMENT AND ELECTRICAL SYSTEMS IS NOT YET COMPLETE,
 SEVERAL ITEMS TO BE REVIEWED FOR CODE COMPLIANCE CAN
 NOT BE DONE AT THIS TIME.
 ** THIS MAY AFFECT FUTURE EQUIPMENT/SERVICE.
  
 10) NOTE: ALTHOUGH NOT UNDER THE TECHNICAL REVIEW OF
 THIS OFFICE. THE STATE ELEVATOR CODE REQUIREMENTS HAVE
 CHANGED.
 PLEASE SEE CURRENT ADOPTED ASME A-17.
 PIT LEVELS 10FT CANDLES
 MECHANICAL AREAS/ROOMS, 19FTCANDLES
 SILL AREA IN LOBBY/LANDING AREA 10FT CANDLES.
  
 THIS INFORMATION IS GIVEN AS A BENEFIT SO AS NOT TO
 DELAY THE PROJECT AT THE FINAL INSPECTIONS.
  
 11) NOTE: THE CIRCUITING FOR THE ELEVATOR EQUIPMENT
 ROOM FOR LIGHTS AND RECEPTACLES IS NOT LOCATED ON
 PLANS. 620.23 REQUIRED TO BE DEDICATED.
 PLEASE EXPLAIN THE SYMBOL ON THE PLANS FOR THE SAME
 ROOM LOCATION SHOWN ON E301. BY THE SYMBOL IT LOOKS TO
 BE A TRANSFORMER OR PERHAPS EVEN A ROOF-HATCH.
  
 12) NOTE: AS NOTED ON PREVIOUS NOTE #32, THE SITE
 CONDUITS FOR THE ELECTRICAL SERVICE ON SHEET ES101 ARE
 STILL SHOWN GOING FROM FPL TRANSFORMER TO THE MAIN
 ELECTRICAL ROOM.
 THE RISER AND PLANS INDICATE A MAIN OUTSIDE, A MTS
 OUTSIDE ETC.
 HOW IS IT THESE CONDUITS ARE NOT SHOWN TO THE OUTSIDE
 SERVICE AND LOW VOLTAGE SERVICE LOCATIONS?
  
 13) NOTE: INTER-SYSTEM GROUNDING IS REQUIRED AT MAIN
 SERVICE PER 250.94 OF THE REVISED 2008 NEC.
  
 14) NOTE: ALL OUTSIDE RECEPTACLES SHALL BE WR TYPE PER
 REVISED 2008 NEC 406.8A.
  
 16) NOTE: PREVIOUS NOTE #38. THE TRANSFORMER ON ES 101
 SITE PLANS IS STILL SHOWN AS 100KVA, YET CALCULATIONS
 FOR AIC RATING STILL INDICATE A 225 KVA UNIT.
 PLEASE CORRELATE PLANS. IT IS UNCLEAR WHAT THE RESPONSE
 LETTER IS RESPONDING TO.
  
 17) NOTE: PREVIOUS NOTE #40. THE RISER STILL INDICATES
 A 125AMP BREAKER FEEDING A 100AMP RATED DISCONNECT.
 RESPONSE MENTIONS THE OVER CURRENT PROTECTION AND
 SIZING FOR ELEVATOR MOTOR. THAT IS NOT THE COMMENT
 PREVIOUSLY MADE. THIS REVIEWER UNDERSTANDS THE OVER
 CURRENT PROTECTION AS LISTED IN THE CODE AND AS
 RESPONDED TO HOWEVER THE COMMENT WAS BASED ON THE FACT
 THE RATING OF THE DISCONNECT NEEDS TO COORDINATE WITH
 THE BREAKER OCP.
  
 18) NOTE: PREVIOUS NOTE #29. SYSTEM IS REQUIRED TO BE
 DEDICATED FOR ELEVATOR EQUIPMENT ROOM. SHARING THE VRV
 AS RESPONDED WITH THE ANY OTHER AREAS ETC IS NOT
 PERMITTED. PLEASE SEE FBC 3006.2 AS THIS REQUIRES AND
 *INDEPENDENT* SYSTEM.
 IT HAS ALSO BEEN CONFIRMED ON NUMEROUS PREVIOUS
 PROJECTS WITH THE STATE ELEVATOR INSPECTOR.
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
 IF THERE ARE ANY QUESTIONS; OR IF COMMENTS ARE NOT
 TYPED IN A CLEAR MANNER PLEASE DO NOT HESITATE TO
 CONTACT THIS REVIEWER.
  
 DEWEY PALMER
 ELECTRICAL PLAN REVIEW II
 CONSTRUCTION SERVICES DEPARTMENT
 CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH
 561-805-6717
 [email protected]
  


Account Summary | Usage Policy | Privacy Policy
Copyright © 2005 – 2014, SunGard Pentamation, Inc & City of West Palm Beach, FL – All Rights Reserved