| Plan Review Notes For Permit 10010398 |
| Permit Number |
10010398 |
|
| Review Stop |
FIRE |
| Sequence Number |
1 |
|
| Notes |
| Date |
Text |
| 2010-02-06 12:47:34 | *****DENIED***** | | | | | | | | | 1. STRUCTURES UNDERGOING CONSTRUCTION, ALTERATION, OR | | | DEMOLITION OPERATIONS SHALL COMPLY WITH NFPA 241 - 2004 | | | EDITION. | | | | | | 2. THE PROJECT SITE ADDRESS, NAME OF OWNER AND OCCUPANT | | | SHALL BE IN THE TITLE BLOCK OF EACH SUBMITTED PLAN | | | SHEET. A POINT OF COMPASS (DIRECTIONAL INDICATOR) IS | | | RECOMMENDED TO BETTER DETAIL LAYOUT OF THE FLOOR PLAN. | | | | | | 3. PLANS FAIL TO INDICATE THE TYPE OF OCCUPANCY, | | | OCCUPANT LOADS, WHETHER BUILDING HAS FIRE SPRINKLER | | | AND/OR FIRE ALARM SYSTEMS, ETC. | | | | | | 4. NFPA 101, LIFE SAFETY CODE, 2006 EDITION SHALL BE | | | REFERENCED. | | | | | | 5. SPECIFY THE INTERIOR FINISH MATERIALS FOR THE NEW | | | WALLS AND/OR CEILING IN TERMS OF CLASS A, CLASS B, OR | | | CLASS C. | | | | | | 6. HOW DOES THE SCOPE OF WORK IMPACT TRAVEL DISTANCE TO | | | EXITS? | | | | | | 7. IF EQUIPPED, DOES THE SCOPE OF WORK HAVE CAUSE FOR | | | THE FIRE ALARM AND/OR FIRE SPRINKLER SYSTEM(S) TO BE | | | REMODELED? | | | | | | 8. ON SHEET 3, PLEASE EXPLAIN 3 CHILD RIDES THIS AREA. | | | | | | | | | TO EXPEDITE THE PLAN REVIEW PROCESS INCLUDE A RESPONSE | | | LETTER INDICATING WHERE EACH ITEM WAS ADDRESSED | | | | | | CAPT. MICHAEL A. WILLIAMS | | | FIRE PLAN REVIEW | | | 561-805-6722 |
|
