| Plan Review Notes For Permit 09110400 |
| Permit Number |
09110400 |
|
| Review Stop |
L |
| Sequence Number |
2 |
|
| Notes |
| Date |
Text |
| 2009-12-01 09:18:50 | ***LANDSCAPE REVIEW FAILED*** | | | | | | 1. APPLY FOR A LANDSCAPE AND IRRIGATION PERMITS. | | | | | | 2. SUBMIT A CERTIFIED COST ESTIMATE THAT INCLUDES THE | | | TOTAL COST OF ALL LANDSCAPE MATERIALS AND LABOR, BROKEN | | | DOWN INTO UNIT COST. | | | | | | 3. THE LANDSCAPE PLAN DOES NOT ACCURATELY REPRESENT THE | | | EXISTING LANDSCAPING AND HARDSCAPE ON SITE. A WALKWAY | | | IN FRONT OF THE 2400 BUILDING IS NOT SHOWN ON THE PLAN | | | AND THE LOCATION AND TYPES OF PALMS AND OTHER | | | LANDSCAPING IS DIFFERENT. PLEASE PROVIDE AN ACCURATE | | | 'AS BUILT' PLAN. | | | | | | 4. SHOW THE STREET LIGHTS, UTILITIES, AND ANYTHING ELSE | | | THAT MAY INTERFERE WITH THE PROPOSED LANDSCAPING. A | | | STREET LIGHT EXISTS IN THE PROPOSED LOCATION OF THE | | | RELOCATED LIVE OAK. THE NEW LOCATION FOR THAT TREE | | | SHOULD BE SHIFTED TOWARD THE EAST TO CENTER THE TREE. | | | | | | 5. PLANT A HEDGE THAT IS CONSISTENT WITH WHAT IS | | | PLANTED ALONG THE BUILDING IN FRONT OF THE PROPOSED | | | RAMP. | | | | | | 6. THE PROPOSED LOCATION FOR THE RELOCATED SABAL PALMS | | | IS TOO SMALL OF AN AREA. STAFF RECOMMENDS THAT TWO | | | SABAL PALMS BE PLANTED IN BOTH OF THE RECESSED PORTIONS | | | OF THE BUILDING ALONG THE EAST ELEVATION. THIS WILL | | | INVOLVE ADDING A FOURTH PALM. THE VERTICAL LANDSCAPE | | | ELEMENTS WILL ENHANCE THE ARCHITECTURE OF THE BUILDING. | | | | | | IFR YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS, PLEASE CONTACT ROBERT | | | KUSSNER@ (561) 822-1462. |
|