| Date |
Text |
| 2009-11-23 11:23:21 | PASSED WITH PROVISOS. |
| | RESPOND TO; |
| | DEAN S. LAUDERMILK, PROJECT COORDINATOR |
| | W-494-1083, F-494-1116, [email protected] |
| | 4TH FLOOR, ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT |
| | GENERAL: |
| | G.1. IT IS UNKNOWN IF ALL COMMENTS FROM PPRC CASE |
| | #Z09060010 HAVE BEEN SATISFIED. THIS APPROVAL DOES NOT |
| | ALLOW YOU TO BYPASS THAT PROCESS. THESE PLANS WILL NEED |
| | TO MEET ALL ZONING COMMENTS. SECOND COMMENT. |
| | G.2. COMMENTS BY PALNNING AND ZONING AND REVIEWERS IN |
| | CONSTRUCTION SERVICES MUST BE MET PRIOR TO SUBMISSION |
| | TO ENGINEERING SERVICES. |
| | G.3. APPROVAL FROM PLANNING HAS TO BE GIVEN PRIOR TO |
| | FINAL APPROVAL FROM ENGINEERING SERVICES. PLANS WILL |
| | NEED TO BE REDRAWN AND THEN SUBMITTED TO ENGINEERING. |
| | STORM WATER CALCULATIONS, WITH PRE-VERSUS POST FLOWS |
| | ARE REQUIRED. |
| | G.4. WHEN PLAN IS APPROVED ADDITIONAL PERMITS WILL BE |
| | REQUIRED FOR WORK IN THE RIGHT-OF-WAY OF THE ALLEY AND |
| | S. ROSEMARY. PERMITS CAN BE SUBMITTED TO ENGINEERING |
| | SERVICES/TRAFFIC DIVISION. |
| | SITE: |
| | S.1. THIS IS THREE SEPARATE SITES, THE OTHER RELATED |
| | PERMIT NUMBERS ARE; |
| | 09110057 (NORTH), 09110060 (CDD), 09110055 (SOUTH). |
| | SHEET LP-1. LANDSCAPING PLAN: |
| | LP.1. SWALES CAN NOT HAVE HEDGES AND MULCH IN THEM. |
| | RUN-OFF WILL TAKE THE MULCH AND FILL THE STORM WATER |
| | SYSTEM, HEDGES WILL SLOW THE FLOW OF WATER AND |
| | EVENTUALLY FILL THE SWALE. EITHER REMOVE ALL |
| | LANDSCAPING FROM THE SWALES, OR REROUTE THE STORM WATER |
| | FLOW. THE PAVED PARKING LOT MUST BE REDESIGNED TO SHOW |
| | THERE IS A ROUTE FOR THE WATER TO FLOW TO THE CATCH |
| | BASINS. SECOND COMMENT. |
| | 2. SITE LINES ARE IN THE WRONG LOCATION AND THE HEDGES |
| | AND TREES ARE WITHIN THE AREA, THEY WILL NEED TO BE |
| | MOVED. |
| | SP-1.0 SITE PLAN: |
| | SP.1. THE SITE PLAN SHOWS THE SITE TRIANGLE AT THE |
| | PROPERTY LINE, NOT THE BACK OF SIDEWALK AS IT IS |
| | SUPPOSED TO BE. RELOCATE THE SITE TRIANGLE EAST TO THE |
| | BACK OF THE SIDEWALK (THIS AREA IS BEING GIVEN TO THE |
| | CITY AS A SIDEWALK EASEMENT), THEN, REDO THE LANDSCAPE |
| | PLAN. |
| | SHEET C-1 PAVING AND DRAINGE PLAN: |
| | C-1.1. THE SWALES CAN NOT BE USED TO DIRECT THE FLOW OF |
| | WATER, NOT WHEN THE SWALES ARE FULL OF HEDGES AND |
| | MULCH, REDESIGN. SECOND COMMENT. |
| | C-1.2. PER EMAIL FROM [email protected], DATED |
| | 11-17-09, ADD SECOND STOP SIGN AND STOP BAR TO THE |
| | ALLEY WHERE THE PARKING LOT EMPTIES INTO ROSEMARY. |
| | C-1.3. THERE ARE NO DETAIL SHEETS FOR THE DRAINAGE |
| | SYSTEM. THE PLAN CAN NOT BE PERMITTED WITHOUT THEM. |
| | |
